Brakes Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

92 vs 2001 rear brake lines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2018, 03:12 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
CatmanFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: this car
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: 93 LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 01 SS
92 vs 2001 rear brake lines

title says it all. how much difference is there between the 92 rear disc brake lines and a 2001 rear disc brake line setup. I'm looking for decent pics but not having luck. I need to know if the original 92 lines will fit up to the 2001 brakes without too much nonsense. It looks like both have a bracket where the steel line goes to a flex hose that connects to the caliper. I'm unsure if there would be line length or fitment issues of some sort moving the 92 lines onto the 2001 rear diff. thanks
Old 02-16-2018, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 92 vs 2001 rear brake lines

Length is different, flex hoses and hard lines since the later axles are wider and the calipers are flipped on the 3rd gen. Either way, you can swap the lines since the threads are them same if that's what your asking.
Old 02-16-2018, 10:54 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
 
CatmanFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: this car
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: 93 LT1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 01 SS
Re: 92 vs 2001 rear brake lines

Do the hard lines on the 92 go all the way to the caliper, or does it have a hyd hose?
Attached Thumbnails 92 vs 2001 rear brake lines-011.jpg   92 vs 2001 rear brake lines-rr_disc_brake_assy.jpg  

Last edited by CatmanFS; 02-16-2018 at 11:02 PM.
Old 02-17-2018, 09:43 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 92 vs 2001 rear brake lines

Only the early cars with the iron calipers had no flex hose on one side. After 88 or so they went to the aluminum pbr claipers and both sides have flex hoses
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rock861261
LSX and LTX Parts
4
08-29-2012 09:49 PM
jrz28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
09-13-2011 05:43 PM
jrz28
Brakes
2
05-26-2011 08:21 PM
ebmiller88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
10
05-28-2007 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: 92 vs 2001 rear brake lines



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM.