Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Holley 600 vs 650 spreadbore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2001 | 06:15 PM
  #1  
Black 84 Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 171
Likes: 4
From: Ocala, FL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 350ci
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 12 bolt
Holley 600 vs 650 spreadbore

I'm getting one of these 2 carbs to replace the ailing q-jet. I'm kinda stuck on which one though. I thought I might post what I see as pros and cons and see what you guys think.

600 squarebore
PROS-new; simpler to work on
CONS-price; lower flow rate; less adjustable (metering plate on secondaries)

650 spreadbore
PROS-much cheaper; small primaries for MPG; more flow (more than the rated cfm, like 680)
CONS-may need rebuild; older technology

Everything else is similar/same.

My car is 98% street driven, so reliability and MPG are key. Would there be a major difference in performance? How about mileage? I'm leaning toward the spreadbore, so how hard is it to rebuild a holley vac. sec? Any opinions or advice is much appreciated. BTW, its holley all the way, not really considering any other one. Thanx
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2001 | 06:33 PM
  #2  
Cosmik Debris's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
What engine? Auto or manual? Vacuum secondaries or DP?

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2001 | 06:59 PM
  #3  
Jester's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
I went from a newer 600 VS to an older spreadbore 650 DP...prolly the exact same 2 carbs you are talking about.

I only did it because I had a manual and 3.73's...and the VS carb was bogging on every shift.

is it the 6210 650 spreadbore? Thats what I have. They have a funky float bowl setup I don't like, and I don;t like spreadbores either. If I didn't have the stick..I would have stayed with the 600VS. You won't see much of a performance difference with only 50cfm difference.

------------------
"American made baby. 100% American iron. The muscle among the masses. My hero. Yep, you can take your ergonomically designed, space age, computer controlled, 4 door, cup holding map lighted split double wishbone split fold down retractable cargo covered moon roof piece of transportation and keep it. For I have felt the thunder. And I know the difference!"
JSP Motorsports
ICON Motorsports
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2001 | 08:10 PM
  #4  
82camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 3
From: NE
Car: 82 camaro SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
I agree, 50 cfm in a street car is nothing. A square bore has better fuel distribution. The 600 squarebore primaries are small enough to get the same mileage if both are tuned to maximum efficiency. The metering plate is usually about right and can be converted to a metering block with jets if needed. Go with the squarebore.

------------------
350 with stealth intake, holley carb, 470 lift cam. 700r4 with .5 boost valve, vette servo, tci lock-up kit, B&M megashifter. Richmond 3.73 gears, powertrax locker, timkin bearings, synthetic lube. Custom 3 inch single into 2 2.5 pipes. 1 1/2 drop springs, 1 5/16 solid front sway bar, 1 inch rear bar, custom subframe connectors, custom LCA relocation brackets. Kobel ground FX, current red metallic paint. Lots of other stuff...
82camaro
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
bbsr72
TPI
3
Apr 2, 2016 09:12 AM
sreZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 22, 2015 08:21 AM
Royal_Z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 30, 2015 08:45 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.