Stock intake manifold Q?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia.
Car: 1984 Trans-Am WS6
Engine: WAS: 5.0HO, SOON: ZZ383-425HP.
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
Stock intake manifold Q?
hey all, i took my intake manifold off today for the first time and i discoverd that the back waterjacket is not in use (blanked off) wouldent this cause it to run hot in the rear of the heads?
I think it is the OEM manifold all it has on it is "GM CFM".
I think it is the OEM manifold all it has on it is "GM CFM".
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Thats normal. No factory manifold ever had a passage back there.
The reason there are water jacets at the back of the heads, is that there are not 2 castings of a set of heads... its only one casting, one facing one way, and the other reversed. What I mean is, the front water jacket on one head, is the back one on the other head.
The reason there are water jacets at the back of the heads, is that there are not 2 castings of a set of heads... its only one casting, one facing one way, and the other reversed. What I mean is, the front water jacket on one head, is the back one on the other head.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia.
Car: 1984 Trans-Am WS6
Engine: WAS: 5.0HO, SOON: ZZ383-425HP.
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
AH i c but if i drilled a .78in/20mm hole in either side of the manifold and put a fitting in both holes with hose going from one side to the other would the car run cooler?
I know not a lot but a little?
I know not a lot but a little?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,037
Likes: 2,502
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Yeah there's probably over 100 million SBCs that have been on the road now for over 50 years; and it didn't matter to them.
I'm guessing your's'll probably be OK without it too.
Although, in the latest few years (from around 87 or so on up), they DID use those extra passages to feed the heater core. Probably saved money on all that extra heater hose they didn't have to put on new cars.
Which, I laugh; but at, say, $1 per car over a few million cars, that might add up almost to some pocket change.
I'm guessing your's'll probably be OK without it too.

Although, in the latest few years (from around 87 or so on up), they DID use those extra passages to feed the heater core. Probably saved money on all that extra heater hose they didn't have to put on new cars.
Which, I laugh; but at, say, $1 per car over a few million cars, that might add up almost to some pocket change.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM






