chip versus carb mods?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 260
Likes: 1
Car: -88 TA GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: TH700
chip versus carb mods?
So, I have a Trans Am -85 lg4 305. It has a freeflowing exhaust, mild cam crane 114112(still an improvement over stock..) and a dual snorkle setup from a l69. Now I want to either mod the carb to resemble a l69 carb or get an aftermarketchip that makes timing and fuel-curve more aggresive....
My question: Should I stick with getting a good aftermarket chip for an lg4 ( like jet J2018511S), or should I also do changes to the carb?
Hasse
My question: Should I stick with getting a good aftermarket chip for an lg4 ( like jet J2018511S), or should I also do changes to the carb?
Hasse
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
There isn't that much to do to the carb beyond secondary rods & hanger.
You probably won't see much difference with a chip, but I'm not familiar with what a Jet chip does for you, either.
You probably won't see much difference with a chip, but I'm not familiar with what a Jet chip does for you, either.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 260
Likes: 1
Car: -88 TA GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: TH700
Re: chip versus carb mods?
Actually what Im looking for from a chip, is adjusted timing. Thats the main reason I want one. Dont know if I want stage 1 or 2 though.....
Regarding the carb I just thought that tehe chip and secondary rod/hanger mods would achive the same effects and that doing both would be overkill..
Regarding the carb I just thought that tehe chip and secondary rod/hanger mods would achive the same effects and that doing both would be overkill..
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo BC Canada
Car: 2004 GMC 2500HD
Engine: Duramax LLY
Transmission: Allison
Re: chip versus carb mods?
Actually what Im looking for from a chip, is adjusted timing. Thats the main reason I want one. Dont know if I want stage 1 or 2 though.....
Regarding the carb I just thought that tehe chip and secondary rod/hanger mods would achive the same effects and that doing both would be overkill..
Regarding the carb I just thought that tehe chip and secondary rod/hanger mods would achive the same effects and that doing both would be overkill..
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
It sure is. That's why you disconnect the ECM connector before setting the timing.
L69's had knock sensor, as did the higher compression LG4's from '85-'87.
----------
Not really. More like you need to do both in order to achieve max benefits from either.
L69's had knock sensor, as did the higher compression LG4's from '85-'87.
----------
Not really. More like you need to do both in order to achieve max benefits from either.
Last edited by five7kid; Dec 4, 2008 at 11:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 16
From: St. Cloud, MN
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F - to be installed
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: chip versus carb mods?
My 84 L69 has a knock sensor, though I'm not sure how much the timing is actually controlled by the computer, though I know it is. It's got to be one of the most primitive computers ever put in a car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Tech / General Engine
0
Sep 3, 2015 03:23 AM







