Going back to CCC
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Going back to CCC
Ok, so the car is an 87 Camaro SC. Its got an LG4 (Vin H), which, by my research, came with a CCC Q-jet system. When I bought it, it had another Q jet from a let 70's truck (I don't have the number with me but its not important) and a vacuum advance distributor on it. All of the connectors to the ECU are still there (and so is the ECU itself) so I know its going to be plug and play for the most part, but I am converting it back to the way the General made it with full ECU functions and most (if not all) emissions components still intact.
Alright - so my question is, how do I know what carb and distributor to look for? I know I need a CCC Q-jet (E4ME?) and an electronic controlled distributor - but i don't know if there are different part numbers for different years/models. For example, I found a CCC carb from an 86 Monte, would that work? Please post back if you need more info on the car I may have left some things out.
Thanks a bunch!
Alright - so my question is, how do I know what carb and distributor to look for? I know I need a CCC Q-jet (E4ME?) and an electronic controlled distributor - but i don't know if there are different part numbers for different years/models. For example, I found a CCC carb from an 86 Monte, would that work? Please post back if you need more info on the car I may have left some things out.
Thanks a bunch!
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,871
Likes: 2,430
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Going back to CCC
Yes the MC carb will work. May even be the same part # as a F-body one.
There's not alot of difference among the CC Q-Jets, as long as they're for the same brand of motor. One for an Olds 307 for example would be a PITA to install.
Distributor shouldn't matter, since it doesn't do any of the timing calibration type things anyway. All it does is trigger the ECM and switch the spark to the right plug. Much dumber than they are in a non-CC setup.
There's not alot of difference among the CC Q-Jets, as long as they're for the same brand of motor. One for an Olds 307 for example would be a PITA to install.
Distributor shouldn't matter, since it doesn't do any of the timing calibration type things anyway. All it does is trigger the ECM and switch the spark to the right plug. Much dumber than they are in a non-CC setup.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Thanks for the response. Ok so I get it with the carb, but for the distributor I don't think the one I have is correct because it has a vacuum modulator for the timing advance and I was told that originally it should be ECM controlled.
Re: Going back to CCC
Yes, you need a CCC distributor. As long as it's from a Chevy, it doesn't really matter what year unless I'm missing something and Chevy changed some of their later CCC engine designs ( and I don't think they did ).
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Bringing this one back from the dead I picked up an 02 Z28 6 speed so I've been driving that for a while... now that Chicago winter is upon us I want to get back into fixing up this 87 beater for winter. Is there a way to know if i need a large or small cap distributor? Or remote/integral coil?
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,737
Likes: 994
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
you can run either but you will need to make or buy a adapter. why would you go back to the junk ccc.
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
87's had the small cap distributor with separate coil. If the original harness is still there, you should look for that type (and it sounds like the original harness is still intact). Both the coil and distributor are available from the aftermarket if you can't find used ones.
Last edited by five7kid; Nov 22, 2011 at 07:02 PM. Reason: content
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
The LG4 dist is available reman at most of the chains and should come with an ignition control module for under $100. You'll have to purchase the cap/rotor and coil separately. I wouldn't go for a used small cap dist. They have some issues with 'disintegration' of the pieces under the rotor.
The large cap dist had an ICM with a different number of pins (and different, spade connectors). To my knowledge the added pin on the small cap ICM was a dedicated ground.
The large cap dist had an ICM with a different number of pins (and different, spade connectors). To my knowledge the added pin on the small cap ICM was a dedicated ground.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,737
Likes: 994
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
both are 4 pin connectors to the distributor for the high/ low ecm reference.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Ignore that response.
87's had the small cap distributor with separate coil. If the original harness is still there, you should look for that type (and it sounds like the original harness is still intact). Both the coil and distributor are available from the aftermarket if you can't find used ones.
87's had the small cap distributor with separate coil. If the original harness is still there, you should look for that type (and it sounds like the original harness is still intact). Both the coil and distributor are available from the aftermarket if you can't find used ones.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Best one I can get now:

The coil mounts with two brackets that are riveted onto the factory coil and drilled out/bolted to a replacement. I can get a better pic tomorrow if you still need it.
The small cap dist uses completely different connectors for the ICM. It's the eight pin shown somewhere here:
http://www.megamanual.com/ms2/GM_7pinHEI.htm

The coil mounts with two brackets that are riveted onto the factory coil and drilled out/bolted to a replacement. I can get a better pic tomorrow if you still need it.
The small cap dist uses completely different connectors for the ICM. It's the eight pin shown somewhere here:
http://www.megamanual.com/ms2/GM_7pinHEI.htm
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Dude you are the frigging MAN. I was looking all over google for a shot like that thank you!!! If you could get that other pic I would greatly appreciate it. Solid factory pictures seem to be getting more and more scarse these days since everyone mods their third gen. Also it looks like the distributor/ICM pins are facing the drivers side, correct?
Edit: What is the vacuum hose thats disconnected behind the EGR valve, mine has the same one hanging and on mine its not the HVAC since thats connected already.
Edit: What is the vacuum hose thats disconnected behind the EGR valve, mine has the same one hanging and on mine its not the HVAC since thats connected already.
Last edited by Camaro305SB; Nov 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
The ICM pins should be facing the rear. The dist base has a squared flange there that extends a hair from the radius.
The small, hard vacuum line is for the VAC sensor. It connects to the rear port on the carb. You'll need it connected for the ccc-qjet but it's not doing anything now. The line runs through the ECM loom to the sensor on the driver's side firewall.
That was an '87 Z that I had to re-build the harness on. It had been pretty effectively chopped up. I'll get more pics for you tonight or tomorrow of my other 87 (that one's gone).
The small, hard vacuum line is for the VAC sensor. It connects to the rear port on the carb. You'll need it connected for the ccc-qjet but it's not doing anything now. The line runs through the ECM loom to the sensor on the driver's side firewall.
That was an '87 Z that I had to re-build the harness on. It had been pretty effectively chopped up. I'll get more pics for you tonight or tomorrow of my other 87 (that one's gone).
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Awesome guys thanks a lot. I do work at a dealer as an apprentice but their info on 80s cars is stupid vague. I still need to find a CCC carb and one of the older techs here is gonna give me a hand with the rebuild. I want to find some TPI exhaust manifolds too but I think I'll just drill an o2 bung in one of these Heddmans that are on the car for now, although I do want to restore my EGR function so the headers have to go at some point.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 738
Likes: 1
From: Hurlburt Field
Car: 84 Z28, '15 Colorado
Engine: L69
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Going back to CCC
I recently rebuilt mine. I have some pictures here:
http://s164.photobucket.com/albums/u...05/1984%20Z28/
that may be able to help you out.
http://s164.photobucket.com/albums/u...05/1984%20Z28/
that may be able to help you out.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: Going back to CCC
A.I.R. - that's different.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Sorry I'm late. My 87 has a vortec performer intake so the mounting may be slightly different. One of the brackets goes on the same boss as the throttle mount and I had to modify my mount slightly.


Five7 can rest assured his dual snorkel is being put to good use...

Current project: 84 Berli, all day today to work on it!


Five7 can rest assured his dual snorkel is being put to good use...

Current project: 84 Berli, all day today to work on it!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Good shtuff dude! Thanks a lot I've been waiting to find a shot like that for a while now...
Understandable, but don't you need the headers to have an open port to the heads? I don't believe mine do. I could just be thinking of EFE.... So that means there is a passage from the exhaust section of the heads/head to the intake? That'd be nice maybe I won't have to swap headers after all... I realize this thread took a turn, but should my 87 have an EGR solenoid or just a vacuum hose to the valve?
Understandable, but don't you need the headers to have an open port to the heads? I don't believe mine do. I could just be thinking of EFE.... So that means there is a passage from the exhaust section of the heads/head to the intake? That'd be nice maybe I won't have to swap headers after all... I realize this thread took a turn, but should my 87 have an EGR solenoid or just a vacuum hose to the valve?
Last edited by Camaro305SB; Nov 26, 2011 at 12:52 PM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Understandable, but don't you need the headers to have an open port to the heads? I don't believe mine do. I could just be thinking of EFE.... So that means there is a passage from the exhaust section of the heads/head to the intake? That'd be nice maybe I won't have to swap headers after all...
It should have an EGR solenoid.
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 2
From: Bardstown, KY
Car: 1956 Chevrolet 210
Engine: Chevy 305 V8
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: Posi 3.42
Re: Going back to CCC
Awesome guys thanks a lot. I do work at a dealer as an apprentice but their info on 80s cars is stupid vague. I still need to find a CCC carb and one of the older techs here is gonna give me a hand with the rebuild. I want to find some TPI exhaust manifolds too but I think I'll just drill an o2 bung in one of these Heddmans that are on the car for now, although I do want to restore my EGR function so the headers have to go at some point.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
I'm finally looking to buy a used carb to rebuild, can anyone chime in as to if his 84 carb will work with my 87 car? I don't want to be plugging any vacuum ports or anything like that. Ill also be picking up a distributor, egr solenoid, 02 sensor, etc - but I just wanna get the carb in my hands to get it rebuilt and ready to install. Thanks!
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 187
Likes: 2
From: Bardstown, KY
Car: 1956 Chevrolet 210
Engine: Chevy 305 V8
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: Posi 3.42
Re: Going back to CCC
Camaro305SB:
Tried to message you back --- when replying to your PM, it said you don't receive PM's per Thirdgen.org. You can send me a number to call you by PM if you like and I'll call you when I can. Thanks.
Tried to message you back --- when replying to your PM, it said you don't receive PM's per Thirdgen.org. You can send me a number to call you by PM if you like and I'll call you when I can. Thanks.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
I'm finally looking to buy a used carb to rebuild, can anyone chime in as to if his 84 carb will work with my 87 car? I don't want to be plugging any vacuum ports or anything like that. Ill also be picking up a distributor, egr solenoid, 02 sensor, etc - but I just wanna get the carb in my hands to get it rebuilt and ready to install. Thanks!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
An 84 carb will work fine on an 87. The only issue I've noticed is that some carbs have an extra vacuum fitting on the base. Later carbs used it for the EVAP line. Earlier models tied this EVAP line into the PCV line. Shouldn't be any functional difference. If you need the port and don't have it, use a tee into the PCV. Plug the port if you don't have anything to connect to it.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Little bit of an update, I finally rebuilt an 84 E4ME (sorry Welton yours was in too good of shape for me
) and installed it a little more than a month ago and it ran great right off the rebuild, pretty much no adjustments needed after it was put on (haven't adjusted dwell though since I still dont have an 02 sensor installed). The problem I'm having is the car seems to want to stick on the last part of the fast idle cam. It kicks down fine, but as soon as I start moving and come to a stop again it hangs a few hundered RPM too high.
Now, I didn't have a choke angle gauge, so I just set the choke up so it ran good when cold (Chicago winter cold). I've moved the cover around a little bit, but it doesn't seem to help. I can also manually kick it down by depressing the tab on the right side of the carb near the choke linkage... Does it sound like my thermostat/cover is bad? Its got 12v but could it be keeping the car from coming down to idle once warm? I cleaned all the linkage well and anything teflon was just wiped down not scuffed up.
) and installed it a little more than a month ago and it ran great right off the rebuild, pretty much no adjustments needed after it was put on (haven't adjusted dwell though since I still dont have an 02 sensor installed). The problem I'm having is the car seems to want to stick on the last part of the fast idle cam. It kicks down fine, but as soon as I start moving and come to a stop again it hangs a few hundered RPM too high. Now, I didn't have a choke angle gauge, so I just set the choke up so it ran good when cold (Chicago winter cold). I've moved the cover around a little bit, but it doesn't seem to help. I can also manually kick it down by depressing the tab on the right side of the carb near the choke linkage... Does it sound like my thermostat/cover is bad? Its got 12v but could it be keeping the car from coming down to idle once warm? I cleaned all the linkage well and anything teflon was just wiped down not scuffed up.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
You've got to have an O2 sensor before it will run properly.
If the choke doesn't open up completely after about 5 minutes of running, and it's getting 12 volts, the choke thermostat is probably bad.
If the choke doesn't open up completely after about 5 minutes of running, and it's getting 12 volts, the choke thermostat is probably bad.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
If it is hanging up on the fast idle cam (and not just sticking), try spraying everything down with carb cleaner. Make sure the choke is 90 degrees straight up when warm. The fast idle cam shouldn't be able to engage with the choke blades straight up. If it is, check the linkage and try to clean it. Those 'green' pieces are coated in teflon to help them move freely.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
I don't think it does, but does me kicking the idle down have anything to do with the choke opening or closing? Just trying to rule out any variables. I know I gotta get a bung welded in I have some heddman midlengths on it now and I would like to get some HO manifolds but its not on my priorities at the moment. Anyone know where I can get a choke thermostat for less than 60 bucks? Thats my cost at the dealer (10% over cost). Preferably something without the words "universal" on the box.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Kicking it down should not affect the choke blade in any way. If you look at the linkage you'll see a piece with a weight on the end of it. It holds the fast idle cam in place by friction (static) until the throttle action lifts it off and allows the weighted end to fall (when the choke is open, of course).
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Gotcha, that makes sense. Yea when I did the rebuild I was 110% positive that the linkage fell with gravity when the throttle was tipped open. The tech I was working with used to do nothing but rebuild Qjets but we've been so busy lately I'm kinda trying to get this figured out on my "own".
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Ok so I FIIIIIINALLY got my E4ME rebuild, got an 02 sensor bung welded in, did intake gaskets, and dropped in the correct remote mount distributor and coil. Fired it up, timed it, runs pretty damn smooth, but my problem is its running fairly rich. I have a Tech 1 at work and its flagging the 02 as "rich" and M/C dwell is sitting at 10%/6 degrees and doesn't move even when I hit the throttle. Every once in a good while it flashes to 40%, then back to 10%. It is, however, going into closed loop (according to the scanner).
Any thoughts on what to check first? The carb is running off its presets from the rebuild which were done by an older tech here who used to do nothing but rebuild Q-jets, so there may need to be more adjustments made - I just wanted to see if being fixed at 10% is anything obvious. No vacuum leaks that I can find, and Im not gonna scan for codes just yet - it has no EGR no AIR a lotta things still missing.
Edit: I found I had a small vaccum port not plugged so I plugged it. Now I get a few cross counts here and there but still pretty much stuck at 10% or 6*.
Any thoughts on what to check first? The carb is running off its presets from the rebuild which were done by an older tech here who used to do nothing but rebuild Q-jets, so there may need to be more adjustments made - I just wanted to see if being fixed at 10% is anything obvious. No vacuum leaks that I can find, and Im not gonna scan for codes just yet - it has no EGR no AIR a lotta things still missing.
Edit: I found I had a small vaccum port not plugged so I plugged it. Now I get a few cross counts here and there but still pretty much stuck at 10% or 6*.
Last edited by Camaro305SB; May 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Going back to CCC
Interesting thread....you rarely hear of anyone going back to CCC once they've gotten a car that's been hacked up. The system is good so long as it's running correctly. As far as performance, at least in my experience, the EGR valve won't really effect anything nor will the EFE valve (so long as it's open) or the AIR system ...
If you look at how a lot of those systems work, they really only come into play during cold startup for the most part....I'm sure a few might dispute that, but it's true.
I ran mine with the EGR port blocked off - As I recall, I simply took the pintle (valve part) off the egr valve and bolted it up on top of the block off plate on my Weiand Action Plus Intake so it looked like I was compliant.
I had disconnected/removed my AIR managemant valve, and ran the outlet hose from the AIR pump straight to the CAT without issue. I had no "Check Engine" codes - (as far as computers go, the CCC ones are pretty dumb by today's standards and don't look at everything) Most of all, I passed emissions every time with flying colors!
- But that was with an '83 CCC system. Not sure if the computers got smarter in on the '84-up models...either way, lookin good!
EDIT: I "think" the dwell on the MCS should move around a bit and constantly adjust while idling...I seem to recall mine doing that...
If you look at how a lot of those systems work, they really only come into play during cold startup for the most part....I'm sure a few might dispute that, but it's true.
I ran mine with the EGR port blocked off - As I recall, I simply took the pintle (valve part) off the egr valve and bolted it up on top of the block off plate on my Weiand Action Plus Intake so it looked like I was compliant.
I had disconnected/removed my AIR managemant valve, and ran the outlet hose from the AIR pump straight to the CAT without issue. I had no "Check Engine" codes - (as far as computers go, the CCC ones are pretty dumb by today's standards and don't look at everything) Most of all, I passed emissions every time with flying colors!
- But that was with an '83 CCC system. Not sure if the computers got smarter in on the '84-up models...either way, lookin good!

EDIT: I "think" the dwell on the MCS should move around a bit and constantly adjust while idling...I seem to recall mine doing that...
Last edited by Confuzed1; May 12, 2012 at 01:49 PM.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Lower dwell means the rods are in the jets less and allowing more fuel through. If it's not in closed loop mode don't assume that means it's actually responding to a lean condition. It may be just stuck in it's 'last known good' position or the factory default waiting for a rich/lean flag to tell it which way to go.
With the scanner hooked up, AFTER timing has been properly set and curb idle is below 800, set both idle mixture screws at 4 turns out and the IAB set screw at 4 turns out. Give it time to warm up and go into closed loop. If it does, adjust the IAB, 1/8 turn at a time, to get the dwell nearest 50%. The dwell should be constantly changing when it's in closed loop as it adjusts to O2 rich/lean flags.
If it won't go into closed loop, start with the idle mixture and IAB screws at 2 1/2 turns out. Adjust the IAB 1/8 turn at a time up to about 7 turns out. If no success (does not go into feedback mode), start again with the idle mixture screws another 1/2 turn out. Repeat until you get closed loop and near 50% dwell, with the goal being nearest 4 turns out on all.
With the scanner hooked up, AFTER timing has been properly set and curb idle is below 800, set both idle mixture screws at 4 turns out and the IAB set screw at 4 turns out. Give it time to warm up and go into closed loop. If it does, adjust the IAB, 1/8 turn at a time, to get the dwell nearest 50%. The dwell should be constantly changing when it's in closed loop as it adjusts to O2 rich/lean flags.
If it won't go into closed loop, start with the idle mixture and IAB screws at 2 1/2 turns out. Adjust the IAB 1/8 turn at a time up to about 7 turns out. If no success (does not go into feedback mode), start again with the idle mixture screws another 1/2 turn out. Repeat until you get closed loop and near 50% dwell, with the goal being nearest 4 turns out on all.
Last edited by naf; May 13, 2012 at 07:20 AM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 5
From: knoxville tn
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700-R-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open
Re: Going back to CCC
Because a properly running CC system outperforms non-CC in pretty much every way, shape, and form for a daily driver/non performance car. If your afraid of computers thats fine, but I'm sure not.
Ok thanks a lot. I went on Oreillys website and it says the small cap is for Canadian cars, large cap is for American. I'll still probably pick up a small cap since I feel like my air cleaner won't fit with a big one (it doesn't clear the accel large cap thats on the car now anyways...). One more question, where is the factory mounting point for the coil? I see a bracket on the right side of the intake manifold but I thought that was for the EGR solenoid (another part I need to source out...). Thanks again, the kid that had this car before me must have just opened the hood and started ripping things out.. He even CUT OUT the A/C compressor... Why some people think they belong under a hood is beyond me....
Ok thanks a lot. I went on Oreillys website and it says the small cap is for Canadian cars, large cap is for American. I'll still probably pick up a small cap since I feel like my air cleaner won't fit with a big one (it doesn't clear the accel large cap thats on the car now anyways...). One more question, where is the factory mounting point for the coil? I see a bracket on the right side of the intake manifold but I thought that was for the EGR solenoid (another part I need to source out...). Thanks again, the kid that had this car before me must have just opened the hood and started ripping things out.. He even CUT OUT the A/C compressor... Why some people think they belong under a hood is beyond me....
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Retaining function of the EGR can be beneficial in allowing more base timing or reducing spark retard in post 85 models. At throttle tip in during low speed cruise EGR helps reduce pinging, which would otherwise have to be tackled by reducing base timing and/or running a higher octane fuel in pre-85 models without the KS OR the KS pulling timing which may reduce mileage.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Lower dwell means the rods are in the jets less and allowing more fuel through. If it's not in closed loop mode don't assume that means it's actually responding to a lean condition. It may be just stuck in it's 'last known good' position or the factory default waiting for a rich/lean flag to tell it which way to go.
With the scanner hooked up, AFTER timing has been properly set and curb idle is below 800, set both idle mixture screws at 4 turns out and the IAB set screw at 4 turns out. Give it time to warm up and go into closed loop. If it does, adjust the IAB, 1/8 turn at a time, to get the dwell nearest 50%. The dwell should be constantly changing when it's in closed loop as it adjusts to O2 rich/lean flags.
If it won't go into closed loop, start with the idle mixture and IAB screws at 2 1/2 turns out. Adjust the IAB 1/8 turn at a time up to about 7 turns out. If no success (does not go into feedback mode), start again with the idle mixture screws another 1/2 turn out. Repeat until you get closed loop and near 50% dwell, with the goal being nearest 4 turns out on all.
With the scanner hooked up, AFTER timing has been properly set and curb idle is below 800, set both idle mixture screws at 4 turns out and the IAB set screw at 4 turns out. Give it time to warm up and go into closed loop. If it does, adjust the IAB, 1/8 turn at a time, to get the dwell nearest 50%. The dwell should be constantly changing when it's in closed loop as it adjusts to O2 rich/lean flags.
If it won't go into closed loop, start with the idle mixture and IAB screws at 2 1/2 turns out. Adjust the IAB 1/8 turn at a time up to about 7 turns out. If no success (does not go into feedback mode), start again with the idle mixture screws another 1/2 turn out. Repeat until you get closed loop and near 50% dwell, with the goal being nearest 4 turns out on all.
It does go into closed loop. So should I start with the IAB and see if dwell will start moving? With the air cleaner off all vacuum ports plugged I got some cross counts but back on it stayed rich. All adjustments I make are with the car fully warmed up. To be honest it runs great as it is plenty of pep just runs so darn rich... Slight hesistation off the line too but its not that bad.
Last edited by Camaro305SB; May 13, 2012 at 07:00 PM.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Make slight adjustments to the IAB until you get the dwell near 50%. It may be going into closed loop but not able to adjust the mixture enough to compensate and pegging the dwell.
If it's running rich AND in closed loop you'd expect the dwell to be pegged near max, around 80-90%, restricting as much fuel as possible.
If it's running rich AND in closed loop you'd expect the dwell to be pegged near max, around 80-90%, restricting as much fuel as possible.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Right on, at this point I figure its running too lean at the carb and the 02 sensor is trying to compensate but can't. Thanks for the response my little bro is borrowing it right now (I told him to keep oil in his Saturn but he didnt listen....) so I'll tweak it later on and see if I can get the dwell to come up. Thanks again!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Small update, I started messing with the IAB, turning it in bit by bit and it didnt seem to do much of anything. I was tempted to start pulling the mixture screws out when I noticed on the TECH1 my TPS voltage at idle is 5.1 volts. So I gotta check for a short to power on the signal somewhere. Rather that or its a bad TPS but I don't wanna think about takin this carb off again. I will if I have to but I'd much rather do a wiring repair personally. Less fuel to deal with.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
Most likely bad TPS. If you've got an old one in there the plunger 'could' be stuck down but that will usually only send about a 4 volt signal. Before you go chasing wires, pull the plug and the signal should go to near zero volts.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 1
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 305 LG4 (H)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Going back to CCC
Unplugged it reads 5V (5.1 or 5.01 to be exact, cant remember which but its 5 and some change) on the Tech 1. Reference voltage and signal seem to be identical and I would not leave it past the previous owner to leave a harness routed wrong or on the exhaust. Plus the heater control valve leaks so the wires could be rotted out inside the conduit. I'll check it out when I have some more time. Thanks for the help and quick responses.
Oh, the tech that rebuilt my carb told me he didnt see too many bad TP sensors but I'm assuming he meant back in the late 80s/early 90s when the cars were relatively new. Now most of them have been rebuilt you don't know what your getting.
Oh, the tech that rebuilt my carb told me he didnt see too many bad TP sensors but I'm assuming he meant back in the late 80s/early 90s when the cars were relatively new. Now most of them have been rebuilt you don't know what your getting.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,337
Likes: 71
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: Going back to CCC
I've replaced several TPS sensors with 'new' ones in the past few years that failed in short order. I've since stopped replacing a good working original with a 'new' TPS. I"ve even picked up a few originals in the JYs here and there and saved for maybe later.
If there's no change in the reading with the TPS unplugged, go through the wiring. Sounds like a direct short between the 5V lead to the TPS and the sender wire back to the ECM. The third wire should be the ground. Maybe pull the 5V line off at the ECM and see what the TPS voltage is? You can read it without the engine running, key in 'run'.
If there's no change in the reading with the TPS unplugged, go through the wiring. Sounds like a direct short between the 5V lead to the TPS and the sender wire back to the ECM. The third wire should be the ground. Maybe pull the 5V line off at the ECM and see what the TPS voltage is? You can read it without the engine running, key in 'run'.









