Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.
View Poll Results: What did you think of the article?
Very informative, was a great help in choosing a carb.
5
29.41%
Good job, even tho I don't need it. Go sacrafice a chicken or something to celebrate.
7
41.18%
Not bad, but you didn't tell anyone anything they didn't already know. Kinda pointless.
0
0%
Good concept but its just badly written. Rewrite it.
1
5.88%
Too vauge and basic, not really helpful in narrowing down anything.
2
11.76%
Whats is a carberatur anyway?
1
5.88%
soooo...where do I put my injecters on that thing?
0
0%
Who cares...my TBI will beat any of them anyway.
1
5.88%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

POLL: Opinion on new carb selection tech article.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 02:41 PM
  #1  
Jester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
POLL: Opinion on new carb selection tech article.

I got bored a few weeks ago and cranked it out. There seemed to be an abundance of the same questions, so I thought I would write it to get people some basic info. I tried to keep it as neutral as possible. Lemmie know what you think.

https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/pickacarb.shtml

Last edited by Jester; Feb 13, 2002 at 03:03 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 06:10 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Pretty good, I'd say. The newly emerging Demon crowd will feel under-represented, though. I know a local musclecar builder/restorer/tuner that would beg to differ on your "pretty much exactly equal" performance statement - and he's been a Holley fan for years.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #3  
curt86iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: TH700-R4
Jester, good article. it summed up just about every carb and every advantage/disadvantage. i must say, i never regarded the edelbrocks as poor performers, but hey, everyone has their tastes

ps. why would you need mech. secondaries on a car with a 3000 stall? wouldn't vac. secondaries work fine?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
Jester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
btt
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 07:44 PM
  #5  
Flash84Z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: St.Charles, MO/ Edwardsville, IL
Car: '03 S-10/ '87 Trans Am
Engine: mild 350
Transmission: TH350
Originally posted by curt86iroc
Jester, good article. it summed up just about every carb and every advantage/disadvantage. i must say, i never regarded the edelbrocks as poor performers, but hey, everyone has their tastes

ps. why would you need mech. secondaries on a car with a 3000 stall? wouldn't vac. secondaries work fine?
I think he ment that you shoulden't run mech. sec. on a car w/o a 3000 stall or a manual.

As far as Edelbrock's, I think they deserve more credit than you give them. You make it almost sound like they are worse for your car then keeping the stock Q.

-Matt
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 08:50 PM
  #6  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Yeah, doesn't seem to be very neutral to me.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
SSC's Avatar
SSC
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
"Good job, even tho I don't need it. Go sacrafice a chicken or something to celebrate."


Even if I totally agreed I would have selected this one.

BTW I still want you to come up here and tune a 750 CFM carb @ 4800ft above sea level on a SBC.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2002 | 09:20 AM
  #8  
Jester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
Originally posted by Flash84Z28

As far as Edelbrock's, . You make it almost sound like they are worse for your car then keeping the stock Q.

-Matt


Originally posted by Apeiron
Yeah, doesn't seem to be very neutral to me.

lol..well I really wanted to write something along the lines of "edelcrocks suck. You would be much better off keeping the stock carb. Don;t even consider these POS's, or anything else from that company." I think I kept it very neutral considering.

Seriously..I would rather have a Q-jet than an Edelcrap....hands down. A non CC version one anyway...the CC ones are kinda a tough call....
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2002 | 10:56 AM
  #9  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Jester
Seriously..I would rather have a Q-jet than an Edelcrap....hands down. A non CC version one anyway...the CC ones are kinda a tough call....
I must be one of the lucky few. My CC q-jet is the best q-jet I've ever had.

And I don't have my tongue in my cheek.

And I've got 2 Edelbrock q-jets (that are supposed to be the best non-CC q-jets ever made).
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2002 | 09:28 PM
  #10  
bradkeith's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 681
Likes: 1
From: Col, IN
Ok guys, i've got this CC Q-jet sitting in my garage. I took it off of an 305 monte ss I had. IS This carb going to work with out the computer? This is probably a stupid question, I just haven't bothered trying the carb with out the computer yet.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #11  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
"Run"? Yes.

"Work"? No.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2002 | 02:18 AM
  #12  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by Jester
lol..well I really wanted to write something along the lines of "edelcrocks suck. You would be much better off keeping the stock carb. Don;t even consider these POS's, or anything else from that company." I think I kept it very neutral considering.
There's nothing wrong with disliking Edelbrock, you probably hate them as much as I hate B&M.

Being less than perfectly objective isn't that bad I suppose, but it would help if you came clean in the article about your personal vendetta against Edelbrock.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2002 | 08:13 AM
  #13  
Jester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
yeah B&M sucks too, altho I don't think quite as bad as Edelcrap. TCI sucks worse.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #14  
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Originally posted by Jester
yeah B&M sucks too, altho I don't think quite as bad as Edelcrap. TCI sucks worse.
Yeah Jester, I gotta agree with Apeiron. You've been nursing a big-time hatred for Edelbrock for as long as I've followed the boards around here

Now you're out of the closet--exposed, as it were!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
91L98Z28
Southern California Area
10
Sep 19, 2015 09:35 AM
Jlanz55
DFI and ECM
3
Sep 8, 2015 11:28 PM
Wylecoyote08
Engine Swap
3
Sep 8, 2015 08:26 AM
rjcme
Tech / General Engine
0
Sep 5, 2015 01:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.