Convertibles Discussed here are problems and solutions to convertible specific questions, including difficult to find part numbers and other convertible tech help.

Convertible Subframe Connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #1  
travisnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Convertible Subframe Connectors

Been toying around with the idea of getting some subframe connectors for the RS......anyone else done this and if so, what brand did you get and how do you like them? Do they make a huge difference in improving drivablity?

I know when I installed them on my SS, they did made a difference.

Thanks for your input.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #2  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I installed two sets on my 'vert

Sphons on the outside, and alstons on the inside

I was told my 'vert rode like a hardtop

before that, it rode like a wet sponge being wrung out after washing the dishes..... blah

-jason

Last edited by Jaysz28; Apr 7, 2009 at 09:26 PM. Reason: hooked on phonics......
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 11:00 PM
  #3  
WillSpeedy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: Central Alberta,Canada
Car: 88 Iroc Vert/ 1980 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/ TH350
Axle/Gears: 2.73posi/ 3.08 Open
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I have Alstons as well. Got them from top down solutions.com.
They took half the rattles away. I'm looking at getting a second set (UMI's) for when I have a real motor in the car.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #4  
watajob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Location, Location!
Car: 92 T/A 'vert
Engine: Mild .040 over L98 4 bolt mains
Transmission: Mostly stock 700R4, 2600 Vigilante
Axle/Gears: LS1 3.42
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by Jaysz28
I installed two sets on my 'vert

Sphons on the outside, and alstons on the inside
You got a pic of that? Sounds cool.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 06:14 AM
  #5  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Nope, no pics of the two sets installed...... was trying to get it done in a hurry

Beleive me, the spohn pieces fit a lot better than the alstons.

-jason
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #6  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I've got the Alson Racing set on my convertible. I haven't needed a second set because it still has a stock motor in it. Probably next year when I finish my LSX swap, I'll put a second set on.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #7  
travisnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Thanks guys. I had not heard of the Alston's before and I think I like them better than the Spohn, since they have a bolt in option vs. welding.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Uhh...there's no point in putting subframe connectors on your car unless you're going to weld them in. Over time, the flexing of the chassis will only open the bolt holes and stretch them out. It won't do any good long term to bolt them in. Welding is the only way to go.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 12:31 AM
  #9  
watajob's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Location, Location!
Car: 92 T/A 'vert
Engine: Mild .040 over L98 4 bolt mains
Transmission: Mostly stock 700R4, 2600 Vigilante
Axle/Gears: LS1 3.42
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

OK I'm confused. I thought most SFC's don't fit 'verts 'cuz of the riveted channel under the rockers. How do you get 2 sets on there?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #10  
travisnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by BlueZee28
Uhh...there's no point in putting subframe connectors on your car unless you're going to weld them in. Over time, the flexing of the chassis will only open the bolt holes and stretch them out. It won't do any good long term to bolt them in. Welding is the only way to go.

I've had bolt on SFC's on my SS for years now with no issues at all. I only put like 700 miles a year on my cars, so I doubt I would have any issues with bolts stretching. Plus, I'm trying to keep the car all stock, so if I weld them in, I can't exactly take them out like I can with the bolt in ones.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #11  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Until my 84 was wrecked last year, I had the original type Competition SubFrame bolt in connectors. I did change the metal going from the sills to the center with flat 3/8 steel plate. I found them great and no signs of holes opening up or any other problem. To me, they were the strongest on the market. Now that I have a 91 TAm convertible, they would not work with this car. I now have Alistons and am thinking of adding the Sphons to it also. I would like to see some pics of both on a convertible. My 2cents worth.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #12  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

A bolted connection is going to allow movement no matter what you do. Its just a question of how much. If you go ahead and weld it on after bolting it in place, that will work just fine.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #13  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by watajob
OK I'm confused. I thought most SFC's don't fit 'verts 'cuz of the riveted channel under the rockers. How do you get 2 sets on there?

Alston SFCs are available from Top Down Solutions. Look at the pics and you'll see how they work

http://www.top-downsolutions.com/pro...products_id=90

Spohn has a set specifically made to work with the 'vert chassis.

http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...ible-Cars.html

Both websites have pictures of the parts installed. Take a look and you'll see how they can work together

-jason

Last edited by Jaysz28; Mar 5, 2009 at 05:32 AM. Reason: added links
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:12 AM
  #14  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by travisnd
I've had bolt on SFC's on my SS for years now with no issues at all. I only put like 700 miles a year on my cars, so I doubt I would have any issues with bolts stretching. Plus, I'm trying to keep the car all stock, so if I weld them in, I can't exactly take them out like I can with the bolt in ones.

No offense, but driving the car 700 per year is not going to give you a good idea of how bad the holes will stretch. Especially when I'm betting those aren't 700 hard-driven miles.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
travisnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Exactly, which is why I see no problems with just bolt in SFC. My cars are not tracked or driven very hard.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #16  
BlueZee28's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by travisnd
Exactly, which is why I see no problems with just bolt in SFC. My cars are not tracked or driven very hard.
Then in response to that, I would say it was pointless for you to waste the money on the subframe connectors in the first place. Again, no offense.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #17  
travisnd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I could definitely tell a difference in the steering and drivablitiy of the SS when I installed the SFC's....if nothing else, installing them on the RS would do the same and reduce rattles and such.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #18  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

The ones on my 84 were on there 5 years and it really handled well and they didnt come loose or wear the holes. I checked them often. If you wanted, you could tach weld them in place. I had no choice with the 91 convertible. They were only offered in the weld in type.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #19  
Lyle27's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Car: 87 IROC,92 Z28 Vert, 02 SS
Engine: L98 350, LB9, LS1
Transmission: Auto,Auto, M6
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Hey Guys,
I have been reading up on the SFC's and get the impression that Alston is preferred on the verts.

My question is about any experience anyone has with the UMI ones.

The reason I ask is because the coupe guys have good things to say about them and I was looking at getting a set for my T-Top IROC....then while reading I noticed the UMI site say it now fits Verts also.

My question is whether I should get 2 sets of the UMI, one for for my T-Top and one for the 92 vert with the upcoming Group Purchase.....or is the Alston drastically better for my vert.

I have also heard about some guys putting 2 sets on the vert, but can't find any examples....if the UMI and Alston can both fit without mods, then my decision will be easier....because i can always buy the other set later on if it isn't stiff enough.

Any opinions? Experience with UMI on Verts?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #20  
WillSpeedy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: Central Alberta,Canada
Car: 88 Iroc Vert/ 1980 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/ TH350
Axle/Gears: 2.73posi/ 3.08 Open
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I am planning on getting the umi ones in the GP as well. I already have the alston ones. By the way they mount you can use either or both. The Alston ones mount to the subframes and the umi ones mount to the rear lca mount and go along the rocker.
I would just get 2 in the group purchase than if you need more get the alstons later.

Last edited by WillSpeedy; Mar 8, 2009 at 04:12 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #21  
Lyle27's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Car: 87 IROC,92 Z28 Vert, 02 SS
Engine: L98 350, LB9, LS1
Transmission: Auto,Auto, M6
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by WillSpeedy
I am planning on getting the umi ones in the GP as well. I already have the alston ones. By the way they mount you can use either or both. The Alston ones mount to the subframes and the umi ones mount to the rear lca mount and go along the rocker.
I would just get 2 in the group purchase than if you need more get the alstons later.

Thanks WillSpeedy!
That is exactly the feedback I was looking for. I am glad to hear that they will both fit......now I don't thave to worry about buying the "Wrong" one for my application.

You guys are awesome!
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #22  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

When they say the UMI fit along the rockers, do they mean just to the inside of the boxed in section that runs along the rocker? Mine is a 91 Trans Am Convertible and it comes with the boxed in section unlike the earlier convertible models.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #23  
tmorris71's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, NY
Car: 91 RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 7004R
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - POSI
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I am not trying to hi-jack this thread but I just installed the Alston subframe connector and the TDS wonderbar. I got both parts from Lon at TDS. Great service and great parts by the way!! I could tell immediatley that the car was riding a lot better, steering was stiff and car stopped most of its creaking. My question is this... At normal speed local and highway the car ride was almost like a new car, but when I got up to 80 or better the car started shaking like crazy. It started in the rear and moved to the front of the car. I could feel it in the seat and then it slowly moved up and I could then see it and feel it in the steering wheel. I put new tires on last season and everything was balanced. Pror to the SFC and wonderbar install I never felt this vibration. Has anyone else experienced this? Thank you all for any help....

Tim
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:22 AM
  #24  
Braile's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Warren, Mi
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by Jaysz28
I installed two sets on my 'vert

Sphons on the outside, and alstons on the inside

I was told my 'vert road like a hardtop

before that, it road like a wet sponge being wrung out after washing the dishes..... blah

-jason
To do that, did you Remove your Factory Frame Reinforcement?

Any Chance you could send me pics of your setup?

Thanks,
Fred
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #25  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I thought about removing the factory stuff but I dont think I am game to remove those large rivets not knowing what I would run into. I think the original Competion Engineering would be the best on the market but I think I will be content to add Spohn to the outside now that I have Alistons on the inside.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #26  
krisb410's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Naples, FL
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by BlueZee28
Then in response to that, I would say it was pointless for you to waste the money on the subframe connectors in the first place. Again, no offense.
WHAT!!!!!

SFCs should be the 1st "mod" to any 3rd gen. SFCs are never a "waste of money"
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #27  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by Braile
To do that, did you Remove your Factory Frame Reinforcement?

Any Chance you could send me pics of your setup?

Thanks,
Fred
Nope, nothing had to be moved or changed.

Really can't take pics of the SFC's. The car is already lowered, and I don't have access to a lift.

Is it really that hard to visualize???

-jason
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 10:54 PM
  #28  
macertheracer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: close to Wichita Kansas
Car: '91 RS CP now is the son's driver
Engine: CP =3.1, will get V-8 maybe someday
Transmission: stock
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi W/ disks
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by travisnd
Been toying around with the idea of getting some subframe connectors for the RS......anyone else done this and if so, what brand did you get and how do you like them? Do they make a huge difference in improving drivablity?

I know when I installed them on my SS, they did made a difference.

Thanks for your input.

ok just for the record, I personally do not like any thing they have to offer comercially, I have made a living as a sheat metal fabricator / R & D mechanic. and the things I see I am sure work well, but I think they are built a little light for my taste. I will build my own SFC's and tie them to the outer brace that the convertable's have, using what is called Bridging, Lader bars are built on this design. I am not trying to start a Sh!^ fight just my 2 pennys worth. it will be about 40# heaver but after all, I am not going to be after the land speed record. just a real nice ride. if you would like to see one of my projects look at the Willie's pick up I extended for a friend, here http://www.flickr.com/photos/tinbender59/sets/
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #29  
Braile's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Warren, Mi
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

So you have the Spohn up next to the Factory SFC, and the Alston ones inboard of them? I guess why it is hard to picture is that, I have not been able to find a picture of what the Alston ones look like when they are Installed.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 08:30 AM
  #30  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Here, I found pics in the suspension forum for everyone

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...-sfcs-sfc1.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...-sfcs-sfc2.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...s-undercar.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...gep9290028.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...re-alstons.jpg


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...e-subframe.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...subframe-2.jpg


https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...sub-frame.html

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...s-dcp_0020.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...riverside1.jpg

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...-passside8.jpg




-jason

Last edited by Jaysz28; Apr 8, 2009 at 09:07 AM. Reason: added more pics
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #31  
krisb410's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Naples, FL
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by Jaysz28
Here, I found pics in the suspension forum for everyone






-jason


Wow, that's some old pictures of my car.

EDIT: The 1st three pics, I just chandged his tags to IMG tags

Last edited by krisb410; Apr 8, 2009 at 03:17 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #32  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Those pics from the suspension forum are pictured of a car without the side reinforcing. They wouldnt be from a 91 Trans am convertible because I have one and it has that "weak" side box made from sheet metal. I plan on Sphon or something like it in addition to the Alistons that I already have. I think the sill supports are much better.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #33  
krisb410's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Naples, FL
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by yankeecarman
Those pics from the suspension forum are pictured of a car without the side reinforcing. They wouldnt be from a 91 Trans am convertible because I have one and it has that "weak" side box made from sheet metal. I plan on Sphon or something like it in addition to the Alistons that I already have. I think the sill supports are much better.
I thought the point of the pics were to show the Alston SFCs installed in general, not a 91 Trans Am vert.

It doesn't really matter what 3rd gen f body they are in, they install the same on all of em.

I'll tell you what though, the car turned into a totally different car after the install. I know from 1st hand experience that they work.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #34  
vorticaldavid's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, Tx
Car: 1992 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: LS1 posi/disk 3.42
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

will the alstons or any SFC fit with 3in exhaust piping?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 04:18 AM
  #35  
yankeecarman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 21
From: Melbourne Australia but from South Carolina
Car: 1991 Trans Am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Like I said earlier, the 84 Z28 I had before was a ttop car. The competition engineering after I made a slight change was really great. I change the metal piece that runs from the sills to the center member to a flat piece of steel to eliminate ground clearance problems. Mine changed from a two inch piece of metal to a 3/8 piece of metal from the sills to the center member. I had no ground clearance problem at all. I now with a 91 Trans Am Convertible with Aliston connectors plan to add a Spohn connector or something that I make up to add to it. I know what I want and I will get to that point. To me, Camaro or Firebird should not have put that box on the sills but should have put something much more structural instead. Fight with me if you will, but this really is a convertible forum and should be aimed at convertibles and not the "Run of the mills" GM product. Any opinions?
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 05:13 AM
  #36  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Ok, since I took the time to *search* for the pictures, I'll tackle your statement

Most people posting didn't know where the alstons mounted to the car. The alstons mount the same way, no matter if its a coupe or 'vert.

The spohns mount similarily, sans welding them to the pinch weld. There are people who couldn't visualize that.

With the perimeter style SFC's, the only style I'm aware of that will clear the factory boxes are Spohns. Of course, I haven't been researching if anyone is offering 'vert specific SFC's either.

So while those pics are not of 'verts, they are still relavent as they give a visual to how the Alstons mount/install. I will try to get my 'vert up on a set of ramps, rearend on jackstands and take a picture or two of both sets installed to make this 'vert specific' if that is what is required

-jason
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #37  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

There is not much different under the car from a convertible to a hardtop/t-top, making a big deal about the factory SFC's not being in pictures (that you would likely not see or wouldnt matter) is silly if you ask me. In fact of all the pictures and recommendations for SFC's posted above, only one of them (dont know what those are, Jegs? They look similar to the discontinued SSM's) shows SFC's that would not fit a convertible.

This picture (which is a nice shot of the entire "frame" anyway)
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/atta...gep9290028.jpg

Last edited by madmax; Apr 9, 2009 at 01:25 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #38  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Whelp, here are the pics I snapped of mine today to appease the 'vert specific questions

http://s292.photobucket.com/albums/m...z28/Vert/SFCs/

FWIW, thats a 3" exhaust, no cat obviously....

-jason

Last edited by Jaysz28; Apr 9, 2009 at 06:11 PM. Reason: exhaust size
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #39  
jagevileye21's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: T56 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Aftering looking at the install pictures of the three different SFC's (UMI, Spohn & Alstons). It looks like only the Spohns and Alstons will be able to used together just because of how the Alstons and UMI both weld to the subframe. Structurally the UMI's look stronger then the Spohns but I like how the Spohns are welded along the rails. Would the rivets still have to be shaved off for either set?

Jay
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #40  
Braile's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Warren, Mi
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Thanks for the Pics that helps a ton.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 08:52 AM
  #41  
jagevileye21's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: T56 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Please disregard my last post... After looking at the pics again I can see that you will be able to use the alstons with both the umi's and spohns.

Jay
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 10:12 AM
  #42  
shaggyowl's Avatar
Junior Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Ramsey, MN
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 5.0 V8
Transmission: auto
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

I have a 91 Z28 vert and was going to have a shop install the Spohn SFCs. They told me the job with all the spot welds required pulling up all the interior seats and carpet (to prevent fire) and removing a fair amount of the undercoating. With the factory boxed in rocker supports he didn't see that much benefit for the cost of the work it would take to install these. He quoted me around $1000 in labor. Ouch!


I had SFCs install on my '92 Z28 ttop by another shop for less than $400.


Is the vert install really that bad and costly?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 11:51 AM
  #43  
blacksunshine'91's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 195
From: Moorpark, CA
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: Convertible Subframe Connectors

Originally Posted by shaggyowl
Is the vert install really that bad and costly?
No, he just didn't want to do the work.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
scotrans am
Electronics
4
Sep 5, 2015 04:26 AM
middian
Electronics
6
Sep 5, 2015 01:42 AM
Vassago
Convertibles
15
Sep 4, 2015 09:37 PM
Jackrabbit501
Electronics
1
Sep 2, 2015 09:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.