ECM 16168625 Vs. 1228746
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Milton, WV
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 i think
ECM 16168625 Vs. 1228746
My camaro currently has the 1228746 ECM..but i have a 16168625 from 93 blazer and was wondering if this ECM could be wired into the camaro to replace the stock 8746, and if so would it be a step forward OR a giant leap backwards?? i was told that the 16168625 would support the EEPROMS,,so that i wouldn't have to use my germ lamp to erase proms anymore..which is a pain in the butt by the way lol
Thanks,
Rick
Thanks,
Rick
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: West Plains, Missouri 65775
Car: 1967 C10 Pickup
Engine: LMM Duramax
Transmission: 4L80E
Use this adaptor form Moates and you can use a flash chip on your current computer, easier then swapping ECU's
Documentation : Moates.Net
Documentation : Moates.Net
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Yes it can
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-prom/270266-tbi-guys-its-time.html
Will it run better? Maybe....
I'm looking at doing the swap depending on if I ever find a short bed full size that is a 350 and not black or way over priced.
But I want a 4L80E so I need to do the swap unless I find a 93-95.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-prom/270266-tbi-guys-its-time.html
Will it run better? Maybe....
I'm looking at doing the swap depending on if I ever find a short bed full size that is a 350 and not black or way over priced.
But I want a 4L80E so I need to do the swap unless I find a 93-95.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM
