Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,737
Likes: 994
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
I believe 85 was digital and 86-89 are analog, all you need to do to get that .bin ready to run is delete your egr check, max the settings and remove the vats and disconnect your ninth injector or the cold start switch.
Last edited by Tuned Performance; Jan 8, 2012 at 02:30 PM.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
Today, undertaking the dive into using $6E (downloaded directly from TunerPro website)
maybe over-thinking this, but there are a few items that i'm unfamiliar with and seeking guidance (using my original Bin + $32B experience) with which items to modify. Using the stock APYM Bin as my baseline
Flag's:
Analog MAF Meter - should i check or leave unchecked?
maybe over-thinking this, but there are a few items that i'm unfamiliar with and seeking guidance (using my original Bin + $32B experience) with which items to modify. Using the stock APYM Bin as my baseline
Flag's:
Analog MAF Meter - should i check or leave unchecked?
Used by the ECM to select between two different sets of TCC lockup tables.
RBob.
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
First drive using $6E: Success!! And yes, I maxed EGR settings, removed VATS and physically unplugged the ninth injector, then plugged in new chip, started it up and drove it around!
I burned both APYM (5.0 automatic) and APYU (5.7 automatic) and did my normal test loop. APYM actually hit knock and 48 deg @ WOT, but recovered correctly and never threw a code; APYU never exceeded my SA tables and never encountered knock. YEAH.
Last edited by ChevyTycoon; Jan 8, 2012 at 04:35 PM.
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
1.) TunerPro = $6E
2.) DelcoHacking = $6E_DelcoHacking
3.) Thirdgen = $6Eexpanded
Both #1 and #3 use flag: Analog MAF Meter in use (HLM) @ Loc 0x14
#2, however, uses 4th Gear Switch N.O. @ Loc 0x14 - and nothing called Analog MAF Meter
I *think* what you're saying is based on using a different mask than what I'm using. Either way, I left it unchecked and it worked.
However....and looking for your experience: none of them have a table for Base Pulse Width (or Injector Pulse Width) other than correction table for battery. $32 and $32B each used this table. Worth using this as a tuning method anymore?
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
If using $6E code, use any 6E definition but NOT a 32 or 32B.
Do not mix and match there.
That will corrupt your bin and anything can and will happen.
Do not mix and match there.
That will corrupt your bin and anything can and will happen.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Spark Adv exceeding table values by 20+;1986 $32b, MAF
$6E is an analog MAF only mask. GM then used that same option flag location as the 4th gear NC or NO selection. As long as the TCC looks up at a higher MPH when the transmission is actually in 4th gear (then 2nd or 3rd), then the option flag is set correctly.
The PW based tuning tables went away in $6E. Gone. $6E uses the MAF airflow and calculates an injector PW.
Note that $6E has a lean cruise mode for better mileage.
RBob.
The PW based tuning tables went away in $6E. Gone. $6E uses the MAF airflow and calculates an injector PW.
Note that $6E has a lean cruise mode for better mileage.
RBob.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikkoV
TPI
2
Sep 9, 2015 04:25 PM
