how do you hook up pcv on a F/I throttle body
how do you hook up pcv on a F/I throttle body
I've got it hooked to a 1/2" port on the upper right hand side of the regular old GM style throttle body on advice from another forum but I can't feel any vacuum at this port. I don't think it's pulling any vac on the motor. Is this the right port? Somebody got a pic of the correct setup? It would be like an L98 motor I think.
Thanks
David
Thanks
David
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: how do you hook up pcv on a F/I throttle body
Originally posted by DavidR
I've got it hooked to a 1/2" port on the upper right hand side of the regular old GM style throttle body on advice from another forum but I can't feel any vacuum at this port. I don't think it's pulling any vac on the motor. Is this the right port? Somebody got a pic of the correct setup? It would be like an L98 motor I think.
Thanks
David
I've got it hooked to a 1/2" port on the upper right hand side of the regular old GM style throttle body on advice from another forum but I can't feel any vacuum at this port. I don't think it's pulling any vac on the motor. Is this the right port? Somebody got a pic of the correct setup? It would be like an L98 motor I think.
Thanks
David
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 24
From: Stavanger area, Norway
Car: 86 IROC Convt
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
What happens if you replace the pass side tube with a breather and just plug the hole on the TB would it cause vaccuum trouble?

Ken

Ken
plugging T/B port
mrr23:
Thanks, I had the drivers side on wrong.
ChevyKen:
I was thinking about plugging the port on the T/B AND the hole in the passenger side valve cover and running with vacuum on the motor. I think old 280z's had a setup like that. No breather, just vacuum being pulled on the motor to pull out blow-by gasses. Maybe someone here with a 280z can set us straight or fill us in on the pro's/con's of running with vacuum but no air inlet thru a breather.
Thanks
dr
Thanks, I had the drivers side on wrong.
ChevyKen:
I was thinking about plugging the port on the T/B AND the hole in the passenger side valve cover and running with vacuum on the motor. I think old 280z's had a setup like that. No breather, just vacuum being pulled on the motor to pull out blow-by gasses. Maybe someone here with a 280z can set us straight or fill us in on the pro's/con's of running with vacuum but no air inlet thru a breather.
Thanks
dr
You cannot run only vacuum to the engine without a relief breather somewhere,the engine will start leaking oil from the front and rear main seals.
Even though some cars may appear to have only a vacuum hose running to them,every car has to have some form of vent to the crankcase to keep the engine from pulling a vacuum under the pistons.Look close on that 280z and you'll find a hose going to the air box that lets the engine "breath".
Even though some cars may appear to have only a vacuum hose running to them,every car has to have some form of vent to the crankcase to keep the engine from pulling a vacuum under the pistons.Look close on that 280z and you'll find a hose going to the air box that lets the engine "breath".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM







