Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables
On the 730 you have the Kpa vs RPM tables.
1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?
2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?
Thanks!
1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?
2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?
Thanks!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Re: Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables
Originally posted by 87IROC350
On the 730 you have the Kpa vs RPM tables.
1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?
2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?
Thanks!
On the 730 you have the Kpa vs RPM tables.
1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?
2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?
Thanks!
Tim
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
So when evaluating scans I should only be looking at only 600,700,800.....RPM and 30,40,50.....Kpa (matching the tables) to determine changes to be made (and not use the in between values)?
Last edited by 87IROC350; Dec 31, 2003 at 04:00 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by 87IROC350
So when evaluating scans I should only be looking at only 600,700,800.....RPM and 30,40,50.....Kpa (matching the tables) to determine changes to be made (and not use the in between values)?
So when evaluating scans I should only be looking at only 600,700,800.....RPM and 30,40,50.....Kpa (matching the tables) to determine changes to be made (and not use the in between values)?
As you get more seat time doing things, you'll find yourself looking at the fuel table to see what it's doing, also.
Supreme Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, Ohio
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
SO the ECM basically interpolates the in between values, based on the nearest available valuea on the table?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by JP84Z430HP
SO the ECM basically interpolates the in between values, based on the nearest available valuea on the table?
SO the ECM basically interpolates the in between values, based on the nearest available valuea on the table?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





