DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #1  
87IROC350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables

On the 730 you have the Kpa vs RPM tables.

1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?

2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Re: Need clarification on Kpa vs RPM tables

Originally posted by 87IROC350
On the 730 you have the Kpa vs RPM tables.

1. When the KPA is 40 on the lower table does this represent 31-40 or 40-49?

2. When the RPM is 600 does this represent 501-600 or 600-699?

Thanks!
AFAIK ... and as far as I have witnessed ... 600rpms represents 600rpms. It's not a range. It's simply 600rpms. Now if the current rpm is 550rpms then the ECM interpolates (draws a line) between the 500 and 600rpm values and then determines what to use. As an example ... let's assume that 500rpms and 40kPa has a value of 50. Now let's assume that 600rpms and 40kPa has a value of 60. Well, if you are 550rpms and 40kPa then the ECM will use a value of 55. Clear as mud?

Tim
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #3  
87IROC350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
So when evaluating scans I should only be looking at only 600,700,800.....RPM and 30,40,50.....Kpa (matching the tables) to determine changes to be made (and not use the in between values)?

Last edited by 87IROC350; Dec 31, 2003 at 04:00 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #4  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by 87IROC350
So when evaluating scans I should only be looking at only 600,700,800.....RPM and 30,40,50.....Kpa (matching the tables) to determine changes to be made (and not use the in between values)?
Initially that's fine.
As you get more seat time doing things, you'll find yourself looking at the fuel table to see what it's doing, also.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 06:24 PM
  #5  
JP84Z430HP's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, Ohio
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
SO the ECM basically interpolates the in between values, based on the nearest available valuea on the table?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 06:40 PM
  #6  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by JP84Z430HP
SO the ECM basically interpolates the in between values, based on the nearest available valuea on the table?
No basically involved, it's pure interpolation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Electronics
6
Sep 23, 2015 06:50 AM
wisemanz28
Tech / General Engine
3
Sep 20, 2015 01:26 PM
IROCThe5.7L
DIY PROM
3
Sep 17, 2015 07:48 AM
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
1
Sep 16, 2015 09:15 AM
Stroopwafel
Tech / General Engine
7
Sep 11, 2015 06:38 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.