DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Closed loop WB readings don't center @ 14.7

Old Mar 6, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #1  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
Closed loop WB readings don't center @ 14.7

I just got my first readings using my DIY-WB. One thing I noticed while in closed loop, my readings don't center around 14.7, they seem to be around 15.5. Is this within margin of error or is there a problem somewhere? I am pretty much exhaust leak free in front of the WB. I could post my log if needed.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #2  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
I'm of no help here because my idle AFR is up to 16.5:1 -> 17.5:1 using the O2 constants ... .. . AND THE EXHAUST IS STILL STINKY!!!

Tim
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #3  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
I uploaded a log here. http://home.comcast.net/~bdimitroff/Gm030601.csv
My free air voltage reading is around 3.93, which I believe is normal. Any ideas?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #4  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 235
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
I took at a look at the log file and noticed what you are seeing. Near the end at idle the WB was reporting an even leaner AFR (16.8-17.1).

You didn't mention the method of data logging, although I think it is through the ECM.

Check that the UEGO side ground is only tied to the ECM. This is important as the ADC inputs are single ended. The UEGO side power can be from the same source as the heater power.

The heater side power and ground need to be tied into the vehicles electrical system away from the ECM wiring. The DIY-WB is designed with this in mind. There are separate power & ground feeds for each of the two circuits (heater & UEGO).

Other things may be from NB & WB sensor placement, what kind/brand of NB sensor is in use, and the actual ECM calibration constants.

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #5  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Closed loop WB readings don't center @ 14.7

Originally posted by PLANT PROTECTION
I just got my first readings using my DIY-WB. One thing I noticed while in closed loop, my readings don't center around 14.7, they seem to be around 15.5. Is this within margin of error or is there a problem somewhere? I am pretty much exhaust leak free in front of the WB. I could post my log if needed.
Oxygenated fuel?
Some refineries are mixing leftover chems into regular batchs.
Are you using a scope?, or something with a sampling rate?, if so what rate of sampling?, it the timing really optimsed?, just a few degrees off, can effect the residual O2 in the pipe.
Winter gas?.

What do the plugs look like?.

How old is the O2 sensor the ecm is using?.

It the engine using any oil?. Which can lead you astray tune wise.

The WB as good of indicator as it is, doesn't mean there aren't outside influences at work.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #6  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
My NB is in the drivers side header and the WB is in a bung right after the y on my SLP headers/y-pipe. The NB is a normal single wire Bosch. All o2 constants are unchanged from stock AUJP settings. Both the heater and controller circuits are being run off the cigerette lighter, how do you suggest I wire it up, change the UEGO ground to a ground pin on the ECM? Also, could the 24 gauge solid core wire on the Ip, Vs, gnd, and Calr connections cause this?

Last edited by PLANT PROTECTION; Mar 8, 2004 at 03:04 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #7  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
I was writing up my reply to Bob's post while you posted Bruce. I am most sure we still have winter gas around here. If anything, the plugs look a little rich, but I am not an expert plug reader, a main reason for the WB. The motor doesn't use oil, but does only have 7k or so on it, when the heads were off 2k ago, the crosshatch didn't look worn at all. Timing is very close to stock AUJP at part throttle, but I'm sure it is far from ideal for my current setup. I have Moates scanner to update 5 times a second, if thats what you mean by sampling rate.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #8  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 235
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by PLANT PROTECTION
My NB is in the drivers side header and the WB is in a bung right after the y on my SLP headers/y-pipe. The NB is a normal single wire Bosch. All o2 constants are unchanged from stock AUJP settings. Both the heater and controller circuits are being run off the cigerette lighter, how do you suggest I wire it up, change the UEGO ground to a ground pin on the ECM? Also, could the 24 gauge solid core wire on the Ip, Vs, gnd, and Calr connections cause this?
The 24 awg on those sensor leads will be OK, the current levels are small. You do need to move the UEGO controller ground from the cigarette lighter to a ground feed into the ECM. Just that one ground line needs to be moved. This allows the DIY-WB Vout to be properly referenced to the same ground that the ECM's ADC is using.

I'm not too keen on Bosch O2's, or a non-heated O2 in headers.

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #9  
11sORbust's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
From: STL area
17.5:1 using the O2 constants ... .. . AND THE EXHAUST IS STILL STINKY!!!
Now you might want to play with the timing.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #10  
PLANT PROTECTION's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
Thanks Bob, changed the controller ground and readings are right around 14.7 during cruise. Idle reading are still around 16.5 which might explain why it is so rough.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 01:21 AM
  #11  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
This is an interesting topic, I would've never thought to relocate my ground for my WBO2 to the ECM ground

Right now I have it grounded to the body near the battery........

should I move it???
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #12  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 235
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Jaysz28
This is an interesting topic, I would've never thought to relocate my ground for my WBO2 to the ECM ground

Right now I have it grounded to the body near the battery........

should I move it???
Which WB are you using? And how is the output (AFR Vout) being used?

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #13  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Right now I'm just watching the display while driving, and when I use the WB hac for data logging

It is a PLX setup. It does have a narrow band output, but I am not using it just yet.

I just find it interesting that when my integrator is around 126- 130 and my blm's are in the 126 - 130 range, my WB is showing an average afr of 13.9 at idle. Just wondered if this might have an effect on it or not.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Right now I'm just watching the display while driving, and when I use the WB hac for data logging

It is a PLX setup. It does have a narrow band output, but I am not using it just yet.

I just find it interesting that when my integrator is around 126- 130 and my blm's are in the 126 - 130 range, my WB is showing an average afr of 13.9 at idle. Just wondered if this might have an effect on it or not.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #15  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 235
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Jaysz28
Right now I'm just watching the display while driving, and when I use the WB hac for data logging

It is a PLX setup. It does have a narrow band output, but I am not using it just yet.

I just find it interesting that when my integrator is around 126- 130 and my blm's are in the 126 - 130 range, my WB is showing an average afr of 13.9 at idle. Just wondered if this might have an effect on it or not.
I wouldn't use that unit. Also, unless it has an analog ground that is separate from the heater control you will never be able to data log the AFR accurately.

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 03:33 AM
  #16  
Jaysz28's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Well it has two grounds, one that I have running to the cig lighter ground, and the other to what I thought was the ECM ground by the battery

As for accuracy, I'll have a chance to verify it when I throw it on a dyno and see how it compares to the shops WB

I'll post up the results once I know for certian

Thanks for the heads up on it though

Now if it is way off, is their a stand alone setup like the PLX that is recommended? Or at least a set criteria to purchasing one?

I barely have time to tune my car let alone try to build the DIY WB setup
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
Jul 5, 2024 11:18 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
gta90
TPI
40
Sep 15, 2015 04:00 PM
sonu1975
Body
2
Aug 11, 2015 08:38 AM
IROCThe5.7L
DIY PROM
1
Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.