AutoProm with Windows 98
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
AutoProm with Windows 98
Wanted to verify correct setting for my laptop (Com port 1)
Using PCM 16147060, $85, AT29C256, TunerCat
Port Settings:
Bits per second: 115200
Data bits: 8
Parity: None
Stop bits: 1
Flow control: Hardware
Drive File Details:
C:\Windows\System\Serial.VXD currently selected
C:\Windows\System\VMM32.VXD (vcomm.uxd)
C:\Windows\System\SerialUI.DLL
Resources:
Automatic Settings Currently selected
Input/Output Range 03F8-03FF
Interrupt Request 04
Look OK?
Using PCM 16147060, $85, AT29C256, TunerCat
Port Settings:
Bits per second: 115200
Data bits: 8
Parity: None
Stop bits: 1
Flow control: Hardware
Drive File Details:
C:\Windows\System\Serial.VXD currently selected
C:\Windows\System\VMM32.VXD (vcomm.uxd)
C:\Windows\System\SerialUI.DLL
Resources:
Automatic Settings Currently selected
Input/Output Range 03F8-03FF
Interrupt Request 04
Look OK?
Last edited by va454ss; Apr 18, 2004 at 10:59 AM.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
It shouldn't need to be that complex.
Just make sure you've got the correct port selected in your software (for the serial AutoProm, on most systems this is COM1, on some it may be COM2).
Flow control should be set to none (looks like its currently set to hardware). The AutoProm does not use flow control (nor does the Romulator).
The software will set the port up in terms of baud and whatnot.
You don't want to mess with the address/interrupt settings of the port. Leave those be.
Just make sure you've got the correct port selected in your software (for the serial AutoProm, on most systems this is COM1, on some it may be COM2).
Flow control should be set to none (looks like its currently set to hardware). The AutoProm does not use flow control (nor does the Romulator).
The software will set the port up in terms of baud and whatnot.
You don't want to mess with the address/interrupt settings of the port. Leave those be.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Mangus
It shouldn't need to be that complex.
It shouldn't need to be that complex.
I already had Com Port 1 selected.
Would the flow control set to hardware cause issues with burning chips?
Thanks for the help!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
I'd go ahead and set it to 'No flow control'.
Also, go into your advanced button under the Virtual COM Port and make sure your Latency is set to '1'.
Also, go into your advanced button under the Virtual COM Port and make sure your Latency is set to '1'.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Craig Moates
Also, go into your advanced button under the Virtual COM Port and make sure your Latency is set to '1'.
Also, go into your advanced button under the Virtual COM Port and make sure your Latency is set to '1'.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




