BLM cells in $58?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
BLM cells in $58?
I take it the $58 code does not support the use of BLM cells in its programming or do I have something wrong in my settings?
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: BLM cells in $58?
Originally posted by Tony89GTA
I take it the $58 code does not support the use of BLM cells in its programming or do I have something wrong in my settings?
I take it the $58 code does not support the use of BLM cells in its programming or do I have something wrong in my settings?
RBob.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Monument, Colorado
Car: 89 C2500
Engine: ZZ838, MPFI, Whipple, & 7749 ECU
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
I can't get out of cell zero....logs never show cell 1 being used. I've checked the enable parms, and TunerPro logging shows learn control enabled. Any ideas?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Monument, Colorado
Car: 89 C2500
Engine: ZZ838, MPFI, Whipple, & 7749 ECU
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
TPS is working fine and the aldl logs show proper function. The values for that hysteresis pair are at the "factory" bbzb bin values:
KF4TPS1 F4 Tbl Closed Throt Thrshld, Upper of Hyst. Pair 3.52 %
KF4TPS2 F4 Tbl Closed Throt Thrshld, Lower of Hyst. Pair 2.34 %
I'm really stumped....
KF4TPS1 F4 Tbl Closed Throt Thrshld, Upper of Hyst. Pair 3.52 %
KF4TPS2 F4 Tbl Closed Throt Thrshld, Lower of Hyst. Pair 2.34 %
I'm really stumped....
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Car: 81 Turbo Trans Am
Engine: 301 T
Transmission: 200-4R
Are you looking at Byte 19 or Mode Word 2 / Bit7? I've never seen Byte 19 actually "work". But, I know the BLMs change by looking at the log file and MW2.
Looking at the address in the calibration ($0459), I'm not sure what it's supposed to be pointing to......?? My guess would have been a bit in address $0059. But I've never really looked into it. Maybe this would be a good "spare" word to use for something else!
Hope this helps.....
Looking at the address in the calibration ($0459), I'm not sure what it's supposed to be pointing to......?? My guess would have been a bit in address $0059. But I've never really looked into it. Maybe this would be a good "spare" word to use for something else!
Hope this helps.....
Trending Topics
TGO Supporter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Monument, Colorado
Car: 89 C2500
Engine: ZZ838, MPFI, Whipple, & 7749 ECU
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by 1981TTA
Are you looking at Byte 19 or Mode Word 2 / Bit7? I've never seen Byte 19 actually "work". But, I know the BLMs change by looking at the log file and MW2.
Are you looking at Byte 19 or Mode Word 2 / Bit7? I've never seen Byte 19 actually "work". But, I know the BLMs change by looking at the log file and MW2.
When MW2-7 is set (idle cell) does this also mean the VE term lookup is from F29E, the closed throttle VE table? If the state of MW2-7 does indicate which VE table is in use, then it would sure simplify sorting logfiles for VE table tuning.
Last edited by 89C2500; Nov 15, 2004 at 01:20 PM.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Car: 81 Turbo Trans Am
Engine: 301 T
Transmission: 200-4R
Generally, that is true. From a quick look at the code, it appears to first check the same "closed throttle" status as is used to switch BLM cells. Then, there's a secondary check of engine speed. It would appear that the RPM must be below 1600 RPM *and* throttle closed in order to use the Closed Throttle VE table. If the engine speed is too high, the Open Throttle tables are used. I would imagine this would only come into play when the throttle is first closed at a high RPM before the RPM can come down....? For more steady state operation, this shouldn't be a problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3.8TransAM
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
1
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 PM




