Tuning Question BLM vs INT

Subscribe
Jul 12, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #1  
I've got some questions concerning BLM's and INT's. I got to do a some data logging Friday before a little underhood fire problem......

I hope this table will post. What I am needing to know is if the BLM's are 108 and the INT's are 86+/- is it running rich or lean.

Code:
	BLM				INT	
Wide Latest				Wide Latest		
RPM \ MAF 24	48                      RPM \ MAF      24          48
400	0	0		400	0	0
800	108	0		800	107	0
1200	108	0		1200	107	0
1600	108	0		1600	124	0
2000	108	0		2000	80	0
2400	108	0		2400	102	0
2800	108	0		2800	83	0
3200	108	108		3200	87	91
3600	0	108		3600	0	94
4000	108	108		4000	86	87
4400	0	108		4400	0	87
4800	0	0		4800	0	0
5200	0	0		5200	0	0
5600	0	0		5600	0	0
6000	0	0		6000	0	0
6400	0	0		6400	0	0
	BLM				INT	
Wide Avg				Wide Avg		
RPM \ MAF 24	48	           RPM \ MAF    24	48
400	0	0		400	0	0
800	108	0		800	118.2	0
1200	108	0		1200	82.6	0
1600	108	0		1600	89.8	0
2000	108	0		2000	91.6	0
2400	111.8	0		2400	83.9	0
2800	108	0		2800	85.1	0
3200	110.8	108		3200	87.8	88.3
3600	0	114.8		3600	0	82.1
4000	108	108		4000	86	89.5
4400	0	108		4400	0	89.3
4800	0	0		4800	0	0
5200	0	0		5200	0	0
5600	0	0		5600	0	0
6000	0	0		6000	0	0
6400	0	0		6400	0	0
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2004 | 09:55 AM
  #2  
The tables were spaced nicely until I actually posted it. Seems like there is a way to post a table, I just don't remember how.....

Thanks for the edit up above RBob
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2004 | 11:00 AM
  #3  
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain C
The tables were spaced nicely until I actually posted it. Seems like there is a way to post a table, I just don't remember how.....
Thats got it.

That engine is running very rich with a lot of fuel pulled.

RBob.
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
In order to change that, IIRC, I think I have to change the VE tables by a certain percentage in those ranges. (I'm trying to read everything I can on the stickies and threads). I guess I need to lower my fuel pressure until I get my PROMinator and install my 165......

Thanks!!!!!
Reply 0
Subscribe