DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Could someone give my FIRST bin file a once over to look for major errors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #1  
327_TPI_77_Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Charles County, Maryland
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Could someone give my FIRST bin file a once over to look for major errors?

Hi guys, I had the guy who programmed my memcal to get my 327 flat tappet hydraulic-cammed 4 speed running email me my bin file today. I very well may end up starting with a fresh factory bin, but I wanted to see what he came up with for my setup as a learning experience. Here is the location of the bin file, posted to my webspace. If anyone can give this bin a once-over and check out a few issues I raise below, it would really help get me up to speed to get me ready for using Tunerpro and the programmer I'm getting.

Steven Hylinski 1987 327 Custom Bin

The car does run half decent and is not throwing any codes, so he didn't do that badly for a first shot with my TPI retrofit on a muscle car 327. He started with an AWBM bin (I believe that's an 87 350 auto, which immediately concerned me because I have a 4 speed setup). Anyhow, I have no experience editing bins, but I do have the current version of Tunerpro and some factory bins to compare to, so I started taking a look at my custom bin. There were a few things right off the bat that I noticed were very different from my custom bin to a factory bin (I'm using Tunerpro in "compare bins" mode to toggle back and forth between a factory 350 bin and the custom one the guy made for me):

--Stochiometric air/fuel ratio. A factory bin has around 14.7 as the spec. The guy who set up my bin has 0.11 as this value.

--Single fire / Doube fire FI size at 40 psig: factory is 22, the guy set mine up as 1.00 . I have 24 lb injectors by the way, which he knew when he programmed this.

--My MAF scalars are way different than the stock bin (can someone explain the basics of the MAF scalars?)

--IAC deadband for park neutral: stock is set as 50 rpms, he has mine set at 862 (almost like he confused deadband and speed?)

--IAC deadband for drive: stock bin is 25 rpms, he set mine to over 900 rpms

--Min/max allowable BLM's -- He set mine to Min 38, max 31. These values seem really super low to me, and I don't understand how the minimum can be higher than the max? ALso the allowable difference between min/max BLM's and the integrator are huuuge in my custom bin. Looks like this was set up so that "anything goes" and it will run, somehow? The car does pull decently up to 6000 rpms even in closed loop, but it is soggy off idle and not as responsive as when I had a well tuned Holley 600 DP on the car.

The car idles at around 750 rpms cold (which is what I told him to get the car to idle at -- I see scalars and tables for IAC steps, but I don't see a base idle speed called for in the bin. How do I go about specifying an idle RPM?). However, I am having issues with the idle being too high in closed loop -- when the car is warm, it likes to idle around 1200-1300 rpms. The rev decay is also very slow when the car is in closed loop -- so much so that when I let off the gas to shift gears, I barely drop 1000 rpms before I have shifted. Am I dealing with a disaster on my hands with this custom bin, or did the guy know what he was doing and manipulate the bin file in a way that would not immediately make sense to a novice such as myself?

Many thanks to anyone who has a chance to give this bin a once-over. I was hoping I could at least pick up some pointers on creating / modifiying bin files by example, but I can't justify a lot of the changes that were made to my "custom" bin file.


If you guys suggest that I start with a fresh bin, should I get a 305 manual bin and paste the MAF tables from a 350 car?

Last edited by 327_TPI_77_Maro; Jan 18, 2005 at 01:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
Dave_Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Re: Could someone give my FIRST bin file a once over to look for major errors?

Originally posted by 327_TPI_77_Maro
There were a few things right off the bat that I noticed were very different from my custom bin to a factory bin
What .ecu file were you using? Sounds like you're trying to read it with an incorrect or corrupted .ecu.

I just took a quick look at your bin with the 32Bv001.ecu, and those oddball values you mentioned were much closer to stock.

Try here:
http://www.moates.net/fileman/index....%20Definitions
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #3  
327_TPI_77_Maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Charles County, Maryland
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Dave, you're absolutely correct, I'm retarded. I was using the 6EV ecu to load my bin file. With the 32B ecu you suggested, everything looks much more normal. Can I use any ECU file I want when I make a bin, and it will work properly? What ECU should I stick with when writing my bins, is the 32B fine? The 6EV has a lot more constants to mess around with than the 32.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
JP86SS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
The ECU file is the "roadmap" to the data locations.
If you use an incorrect definition, you could (or probably will) change the wrong thing.
You wouldn't want a roadmap of Florida if you were in California
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #5  
Dave_Jones's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
And just to make sure there's no misunderstanding, to apply that road map analogy to chip burning, your ECU file must match the mask that your base calibration is coded in.

In other words, if starting with an '87 GM TPI V8 calibration, GM has already built in in $32B format, so you need to read/edit it using the $32B ecu definition.

$32 was used in 1986.
$32B was 1987-'88.
$6E was 1989 only.

You can easily use a $6E bin if you do two things. First is to unplug your cold start injector ('89's didn't have a CSI; so the additional fuel is included in the code). The other thing you must do is disable the VATS bit in the $6E bin, so as to be able to start the car.

A search here should net you some discussion on the merits of $6E vs $32B.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #6  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Keep a close eye on the BLMs as the revs start to get high. The 327ci w/ fuelie heads will like to rev and is going to need more fuel up high. The TPI intake is more for low rev engines. The fuel tables will need quite a bit of tweaking and starting out rich would be good idea.

With the $6E code, you can either unplug the cold start injector or just pull the 3 Amp fuse. The fuse only feeds power to the cold start injector.

If I remember correctly, the 'fan request' switch was changed from normally closed in the $32 code and normally open in the $6E code. You will see the difference by the coolant fan always on if it is reversed.

J

Last edited by junkcltr; Jan 19, 2005 at 12:08 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Silver Spear
South East Region
18
Dec 4, 2015 09:59 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
26
Sep 21, 2015 01:08 PM
3rdgenkindagal
Tech / General Engine
15
Sep 13, 2015 02:02 PM
ChristinaMarie
Exhaust
12
Sep 11, 2015 06:28 PM
pacoelrapido
TPI
3
Sep 11, 2015 02:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.