DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Embedded Lockers, HUD, and the Ultimate TBI code

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #201  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
anymore updates? just trying to keep this fresh.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #202  
SATURN5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
/Patiently waits for boost provisions to be added..
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #203  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
The software is still a little buggy but nothing serious. Works with the Radio Crack USB - Serial adaptor and I should be testing it with a Belkin adaptor late next week.
I'll let Bob talk about the hardware. Here's a peek.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #204  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Ummm yummy!

I see a socket for a calpack. I thought this would eleminate it to use a 28 pin chip with all the code on the chip?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 04:25 PM
  #205  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by BMmonteSS
Ummm yummy!

I see a socket for a calpack. I thought this would eleminate it to use a 28 pin chip with all the code on the chip?
The calpack doesn't have any code on it. It's just a network of resistors needed to operate the engine. Without it you will through a code.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #206  
justlearning's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: lexington, ky
Car: 91 camaro 305 tbi
Engine: 305 tbi l03
Transmission: 700r4
is that an ethernet port?? it says serial but it looks kinda like a com port to me. did u need that extra ecm i was talking about earlier on this page?

John
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #207  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by justlearning
is that an ethernet port?? it says serial but it looks kinda like a com port to me. did u need that extra ecm i was talking about earlier on this page?

John
No it's not an ethernet port (rj45), it's infact a serial port. We're using a telephone cable (rj11) to go from the ecm into an rj11-serial adaptor which plugs directly into the serial port . We don't need the extra ecm but thanks for the offer.

Last edited by JPrevost; Nov 7, 2005 at 12:10 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #208  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Jon,

Is it that USB just isn't feasible? I mean its becoming more difficult to find a serial port on a laptop.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #209  
Teeleton's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 89 S10 Blazer
Engine: Built 4.3L V6 TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.65/Zexel/3.73
Originally posted by JPrevost
No it's not an ethernet port (rj45), it's infact a serial port. We're using a telephone cable (rj9) to go from the ecm into an rj9-serial adaptor which plugs directly into the serial port . We don't need the extra ecm but thanks for the offer.
rj9? You sure? rj9 is the connector from the phone to the handset. rj11 is from the phone to the wall.

Teeleton
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 07:53 AM
  #210  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Dominic Sorresso
Jon,

Is it that USB just isn't feasible? I mean its becoming more difficult to find a serial port on a laptop.
For now the Embedded Lockers baord will be a serial output. I wanted to get the product out there with minimal development time. There is a plan to do a USB version down the road. I have been looking at what it will take to add a USB port to the board.

If need be moates.net has a $30 serial to USB convertor that can be used. Jon has been using a serial to USB adaptor that is working. Not sure which one.

Originally posted by Teeleton
rj9? You sure? rj9 is the connector from the phone to the handset. rj11 is from the phone to the wall.

Teeleton
You are correct, it is an RJ11 jack and cord. I actually used that setup on the wire-wrapped prototype Lockers board. It makes for a nice connection.

I know folks are waiting for an update: I have several units built, tested and installed in ECMs. I will be contacting the beta testers later today. The first Embedded Lockers (EBL) has been in the ElCamino all last week being driven around. I did data logging and some display work with out issue.

I am still working on the calibration table document. But a lot has been added to it. Not much more to go. Jon's HUD really looks good. It is usable as is, with some additional features and functionality being added.

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #211  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
You guys didn't by chance eliminate the underhood ESC module with this, did ya?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #212  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by va454ss
You guys didn't by chance eliminate the underhood ESC module with this, did ya?
The ESC module stays where it is, either under the hood or next to the ECM (full size vans). Were you thinking that the ESC was possibly incorporated onto the EBL's board?

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #213  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by RBob
Were you thinking that the ESC was possibly incorporated onto the EBL's board?

RBob.
Yes, hoping. Like the P4's, I assume.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #214  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by RBob
next to the ECM (full size vans).
I wasn't aware that GM ever had it anywhere other than underhood.

Engine compartment is much less cluttered without the ESC.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #215  
lostreception's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 90 Chevy G20
Engine: 350 TBI 5.7L LO5 1227747
Transmission: 700R4 3.42
Originally posted by RBob
The ESC module stays where it is, either under the hood or next to the ECM (full size vans). Were you thinking that the ESC was possibly incorporated onto the EBL's board?

RBob.
will this work with a fullsize chevy g20 van. i have one of those too LO5 1227227
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #216  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by lostreception
will this work with a fullsize chevy g20 van. i have one of those too LO5 1227227
Maybe 1227747? If so, yes, the EBL setup will replace it.

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 05:53 PM
  #217  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,426
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by lostreception
will this work with a fullsize chevy g20 van. i have one of those too LO5 1227227
When I get ahold of one that is where mine is going. But I am using a 846 out of a Camaro right now. I added 1 wire for the IAT sensor and added the sensor to the air cleaner.

My Cardomain Site
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #218  
lostreception's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 90 Chevy G20
Engine: 350 TBI 5.7L LO5 1227747
Transmission: 700R4 3.42
Originally posted by RBob
Maybe 1227747? If so, yes, the EBL setup will replace it.

RBob.

yes my mistake its the 1227747

thanks
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #219  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
ttt
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #220  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Well I'm the hold up for beta testers. My software wasn't handling file's very well. Crashing looking for a file that isn't on everybody's computer (bin, playback, datalog files). SOo, I've been working on it and come up with a version that will work. It will ask for all of the files each time you restart/load/run the program. This "problem" is on the top of the list.
Sorry for the delay.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #221  
Teeleton's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 89 S10 Blazer
Engine: Built 4.3L V6 TBI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.65/Zexel/3.73
Originally posted by JPrevost
Well I'm the hold up for beta testers. My software wasn't handling file's very well. Crashing looking for a file that isn't on everybody's computer (bin, playback, datalog files). SOo, I've been working on it and come up with a version that will work. It will ask for all of the files each time you restart/load/run the program. This "problem" is on the top of the list.
Sorry for the delay.
No sweat. A smooth launch is the exception, unfortunately.

Teeleton
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #222  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by RBob.........

For now the Embedded Lockers baord will be a serial output. I wanted to get the product out there with minimal development time. There is a plan to do a USB version down the road. I have been looking at what it will take to add a USB port to the board.

If need be moates.net has a $30 serial to USB convertor that can be used. Jon has been using a serial to USB adaptor that is working. Not sure which one.
......................................................................................................


What signal will this box use since the data is not going to be the same as the aldl from the std computor? It will be a serial signal correct? The moates box changes the aldl output to what? serial then to usb? It would be nice to use it since there are several of us using it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Originally posted by RBob............

I am still working on the calibration table document. But a lot has been added to it. Not much more to go.
.......................................................................................................

What tuner will this use? Tunerpro or Tunercat or both?

Thanks.........DM
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #223  
elkabong's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Car: 84 Vette
Engine: 383 XFire
If you guys are interested in testing with a 383, TFS heads, decent cam, 2.13TBs and 90# injectors let me know. I can send you my 7747 for rework. I has the HAM adapter to work with the 84 Vette wiring harness.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 09:54 PM
  #224  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by DM91RS
Originally posted by RBob.........

For now the Embedded Lockers baord will be a serial output. I wanted to get the product out there with minimal development time. There is a plan to do a USB version down the road. I have been looking at what it will take to add a USB port to the board.

If need be moates.net has a $30 serial to USB convertor that can be used. Jon has been using a serial to USB adaptor that is working. Not sure which one.
......................................................................................................


What signal will this box use since the data is not going to be the same as the aldl from the std computor? It will be a serial signal correct? The moates box changes the aldl output to what? serial then to usb? It would be nice to use it since there are several of us using it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Originally posted by RBob............

I am still working on the calibration table document. But a lot has been added to it. Not much more to go.
.......................................................................................................

What tuner will this use? Tunerpro or Tunercat or both?

Thanks.........DM
For the serial to USB convertor there are two type of devices that will work. The most common being a serial to USB convertor cable. These can be picked up nearly anywhere. Will use the output from the RJ11 jack, which is an RS-232 serial data stream.

The other type is two units that moates.net carries. Both convert from 5V serial signal to USB. The ADL1 is one such unit. The other is listed under the honda stuff. That one is cheaper but doesn't have a box. This signal is available on the terminal strip. THere are actually 3 serial outputs on the EBL: two RS-232 and one 5V, all the same data stream.

The calibration table document lists and explains what each of the calibration table parameters are for. Currently a very complete ECU file is ready. This will work with editors such as WinBin, Promedit and TunerPro. Later I will be making a TDF file for use with TunerCat.

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 03:53 PM
  #225  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks for the info Bob.

The 5V. output answered my question on connection.

My bad on the document.........I thought that you were still working on the ECU.

Pretty cool that the calibration table document lists and explains what each of the parameters are for.

Sounds like I'll be trying to get Tunerpro rt up and emulating. I've never used it eventho I've had it since the spring. There seems to be more tables available with TP compared to TC. But after using TC since 2001 the way the tables are setup will take some getting used to on my part.

Like I said thanks again!!

DM
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #226  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
DM,

I used TC for years. But with TP RT 4.0, I never use it now.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #227  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Dominic Sorresso
DM,

I used TC for years. But with TP RT 4.0, I never use it now.
That's cool to know.......I guess it's just hard to teach an old dog new tricks sometimes.

Might as well go out now an try to emulate with it since it's all there's going to be to begin with with the EBL.

As a side note since the my last post I've thought more about connecting to the new lockers board and the 5V terminal. I thought since I have parts cars just pull the aldl socket from one and wire it into the 5V and continue to use the Moates ALDU1 just as before. No further parts needed.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #228  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally posted by RBob
For now the Embedded Lockers baord will be a serial output. I wanted to get the product out there with minimal development time. There is a plan to do a USB version down the road. I have been looking at what it will take to add a USB port to the board.
www.ftdichip.com

Dirt simple, with minimal change/addition to your hardware, and you get to keep your UART implementation. ;-)
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #229  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by Mangus
www.ftdichip.com

Dirt simple, with minimal change/addition to your hardware, and you get to keep your UART implementation. ;-)
Yes, checked those parts out. Problem is the operating temperature range. Absolute Maximum Operating Temperature range before damage to the device can occur is 0° C to 70° C (http://www.ftdichip.com/Documents/Da...s/ds232b17.pdf, page 11).

Not something that can be put into an ECM. Believe me, I've looked. Unless it is the proper part I won't design it in.

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #230  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Originally posted by RBob
Yes, checked those parts out. Problem is the operating temperature range. Absolute Maximum Operating Temperature range before damage to the device can occur is 0° C to 70° C (http://www.ftdichip.com/Documents/Da.../ds232b17.pdf, page 11).

Not something that can be put into an ECM. Believe me, I've looked. Unless it is the proper part I won't design it in.

RBob.
My hero.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #231  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally posted by RBob
Unless it is the proper part I won't design it in.

RBob.
Not sure who would, at least around here.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #232  
Gladstoneiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 1
From: Gladstone, Missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI (ebl inside)
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 lsd 10 bolt
Does everyone open their email and click on the link hoping today will be the day? Only to be more and more teasing. I can't wait, you guys are doing an awesome job and keep up the good work. I think we are already to "see the light."
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #233  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Seems like the more features that you add the more the cost climbs also (USB). It's not like something new unless you've never gotten the hardware to datalog at all. I know some people have had issues with the usb/serial adapters but I'll give Craigs unit another plug as I've never had any issues with it from day one. Hopefully the EBL will have the same user friendlyness.


I can hear Santa now..............what the h*** is an EBL?


DM

Last edited by DM91RS; Nov 17, 2005 at 06:11 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 10:48 PM
  #234  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
hey guys anything new?
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #235  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by robertfrank
hey guys anything new?
Waiting on Jon for the HUD. . .

RBob.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #236  
91RedFirebird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: t-56
Have you guys got a round about price yet? I would like to set aside some money for it, my car needs this bad.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #237  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
hey jon let`s get crackin buddy ,chop chop! JK
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #238  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Dominic Sorresso
DM,

I used TC for years. But with TP RT 4.0, I never use it now.
Never could get it to work on my laptop, especially now that it has to have winME. XP doesnt agree with the hardware controlling the cooling fan on it.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 03:01 PM
  #239  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Originally posted by dimented24x7
Never could get it to work on my laptop, especially now that it has to have winME. XP doesnt agree with the hardware controlling the cooling fan on it.
I haven't had a problem with using it on my Compaq with XP SP2. Are you having a problem with it connecting with the ECM? I haven't ued it for that. With EBL it'll be a moot point since Jon's HUD will be the scantool.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #240  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
It connects fine to the pc and works well in that regard, but the programs features dont work correctly. The dash feature does all sorts of wierd things and the ALDL monitor is all scrambled. The ony datalogging feature that works is just the plain ALDL values display. I understand that he cant make the software work for every combination of software and hardware out there.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 02:22 AM
  #241  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Datalogging is not too good for me either using TP.

But......as Dom recommended I've started using the editor and emulating features and things are going well. I went to Craig Moates site and found a later XDF for the 8746 and the Main Fuel Table 1 has all the numbers in the correct locations now. The tables did not match TC previously as in the values would come up in other cells.

Last edited by DM91RS; Nov 26, 2005 at 07:41 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 02:31 AM
  #242  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Oh yeah I forgot to state that this is with XP.

It looks like new laptops are getting very affordable as I seen several in yesterdays adds for $399 so XP will be used by more and more people.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #243  
BillZ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Car: 94 Z28, 84 Porsche 928, 84 Ferrari Mondial Cab.
Engine: LT1, 4.7L V8 Vortech/749, 3.0L V8
Transmission: A4, 5 speed, 5 speed
Originally posted by Dominic Sorresso
I got all of you guys beat. We used an 8086 running the
PICK OS with 8 I/O devices hung on it doing bsuiness accounting and parts inventory.

Huh, kids. My first was a Kim1 that I hot-rodded by soldering an extra 1K of memory on top of the existing parts. Hand assembled the code and punched in hex bytes on the keypad. Now THAT was a programming!

Nice work RBob, I'm waiting for the 749 version for my 928! (I can help with that if needed)

BTW - how are you building the surface mount boards? Hand soldering? Toaster oven ( http://articulationllc.home.comcast.net/sm0402.htm )? Or do you have access to a real reflow oven?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #244  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
The tricky part with this programming is that there is a lot of data to be processed and displayed. Fifo serial buffer is REQUIRED. This shouldn't be an issue with most but some old equipment might not have it and even the newer stuff might not have the buffers turned up. I've given the program a high priority so it shouldn't "miss" any data even on the slowest of machines.
Finally got file handling done with Bob yesterday so he's got a working version to ship out to beta testers.
"Autotune" works but doesn't update to Romulator/Ostrich/Autoprom and it doesn't even let you save the new bin... YET. It's high priority that I get that all done but if you've used WinAldl and found it useful you'll find this program similar in most respects... only about a 230x more data .
The knock "Autotune" is disabled BUT there is a chart showing you an accumulator of the knock counts the size of the main SA table + extended SA table. Meaning you look at that chart and the end of a run and you'll know where you might have too much timing . Features will be added later as low priority because I'd much rather have rock solid framework in the background.
LabView = efficient but not easy to make dumby proof. Most of the time this language is written BY the user, not for a user . Great for me, bad for you. But not because I'm working my butt off over hear.
In a little bit I'll post some screen shots.

Last edited by JPrevost; Nov 28, 2005 at 05:20 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #245  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
You can set the FIFO buffers programmatically.

Dimented - I've never seen nor heard of such issues with the dash or ALDL monitors. The only thing I can think of is that your graphics chip in your laptop doesn't support bitblt'ing, which, if that's true, its time to get a new laptop, dude. =)

Those two controls (the dash and monitor controls) draw using GDI - the most common method for 2D drawing across all the Windows operating systems. Nothing special there (except for bitblt'ing to reduce flicker, but I didn't think there were any chips in at least the last 10+ years that don't support that. Go figure!).

K. Back to the topic at-hand.

Last edited by Mangus; Nov 28, 2005 at 05:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #246  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Mangus
You can set the FIFO buffers programmatically.

blah blah blah...
Hmm, thanks. Now to find out how through LabView.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 05:33 PM
  #247  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
Originally posted by JPrevost
Hmm, thanks. Now to find out how through LabView.
Jon,

You may want to contact =Jeff=. He's worked with it also.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 05:38 PM
  #248  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally posted by JPrevost
Hmm, thanks. Now to find out how through LabView.
Mmm, Labview. Forgot about that. Good luck with that (and the same poor souls whose laptops don't support bitblt).

Maybe their API is kind and is similarly named? If so, look for SetupComm.

M
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 07:12 AM
  #249  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Mangus

Dimented - I've never seen nor heard of such issues with the dash or ALDL monitors. The only thing I can think of is that your graphics chip in your laptop doesn't support bitblt'ing, which, if that's true, its time to get a new laptop, dude. =)

Those two controls (the dash and monitor controls) draw using GDI - the most common method for 2D drawing across all the Windows operating systems. Nothing special there (except for bitblt'ing to reduce flicker, but I didn't think there were any chips in at least the last 10+ years that don't support that. Go figure!).
I tried it again and it worked ok. Aside from some issues with the menues not appearing untill I drag my curser over them, it works.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #250  
RBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Things are looking up. The HUD is definitely usable and EBL systems are going out to the beta testers. The issue with the serial com and FIFO's is not as serious as it seems. I did some further testing with various serial programs along with the HUD.

With the EBL I am including a DOS based program that is designed just for logging. The COM routines are written in assembler for speed. Booted to DOS on a 20MHz 386SX this program can log to disk the Lockers data stream without any data loss.

What is interesting is that on a 450MHz P3 this same program under Windows (NT4.0) can just keep up. It works, but is on the edge. This program (HDS) also enables the UART FIFO buffers. Windows adds so much overhead to the sserial stream, it can kill it.

On this same machine (450MHz P3) the HUD can not keep up with the serial data. It is capable of playing back and crunching a data log without issue. The other PC that Jon and I were using is a 300MHz AMD K6. It can not data log with the HUD, but plays back fine (this machine is a dog). A little slow, but usable.

So, where does that leave us? Someplace above 450MHZ and around a GHz (maybe) the HUD will receive and display the serial stream live. For testing all I have available to me is either slow PC's (300 and 450MHz). Or, a fast PC: 2.4GHz P4. The fast PC just eats up the serial data and displays without issue.


As it is I was never a fan of live tuning (unless on a dyno). With the availability of fast laptops coming down in price, along with the HDS program to log on any old laptop, all is good.

RBob.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.