DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

General Timing vs. Load Question

Old Jun 7, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #1  
87 Vette Owner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, NY
Car: 1987 Corvette
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: ZF 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Dana 44
General Timing vs. Load Question

I've been reading a lot of timing threads / gathering information as I approach that part of my tuning. I am comfortable with timing vs. load vs. RPM and why timing would generally be increased or decreased as load and RPM change. I will start conservatively (stock table in the apyp bin) and work from there.

In a lot of the threads I came across, members posted about having total advance in at a certain RPM (i.e. 38 degrees by 3000 rpm, etc) but did not specify at what LV8 value this was for. I'm assuming it's not 38 degrees for all LV8 values at 3000 rpm, so when something like that is posted, is it generally for lower or higher loads?

Hopefully my question makes sense...
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #2  
SBNova's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland,Florida
The numbers you posted are *generally correct* for a carb'd/ normal distributor engine. The chevy small block is known to like total timing numbers in the high 30's under WOT. Beware- there are variables. Better, more modern heads like less timing, higher compression may require less timing, and even cam selection will like different numbers too. With EFI, you can more finely tune your curve, but you need to find out what your engine likes. Under cruise conditions you can run much more advance too, which may help fuel economy. You'll have to learn by trial and error here. There are no timing values that work for everyone.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2006 | 05:51 PM
  #3  
87 Vette Owner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, NY
Car: 1987 Corvette
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: ZF 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Dana 44
Thank you very much for the information

When modifying the timing vs. rpm vs. load tables, I am assuming (bad idea) that the "curve" or 3D graph should be relatively smooth, meaning no major increases or decreases from one value to the next, correct?

I know I've got a lot of experimentation and data logging ahead of me, and I'm still fine tuning the fueling, but I can already tell the engine likes more advance at WOT / higher loads than the stock apyp table has.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
Infested
Tech / General Engine
3
May 22, 2018 11:56 PM
Andrew6.688
TPI
10
Dec 13, 2015 10:59 AM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.