Which ECM is better?
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Which ECM is better?
I have one of each 1227165, 16198259, which one is better? or are they exactly the same. I know the 16198259 is a remanufactured 1227165. Does that make it better or not?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by okfoz:
I have one of each 1227165, 16198259, which one is better? or are they exactly the same. I know the 16198259 is a remanufactured 1227165. Does that make it better or not?</font>
I have one of each 1227165, 16198259, which one is better? or are they exactly the same. I know the 16198259 is a remanufactured 1227165. Does that make it better or not?</font>
165s have a reputation for poor solder joints. The failure rate is really low, but there are so many out there that they seem to be weaker then others.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM
