DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

general question about spark tables...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #1  
396V8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Corvette
Engine: 415
Transmission: six speed
Axle/Gears: Dana44 3.73
general question about spark tables...

Hi all

i have a question about spark tables...

when you look at a stock bin, the spark adavance is real mild, sometimes not mor than 20° in upper rpm VE regions..

on "tuned" bins, the spark adv is much more aggressive..

why ?

just octane purposes?

who is right? the maker of the stock bin, oder the maker of the tuned bin?

thank you
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Lots of fuel and lots of spark tends to make people think it feels really good :-)

This isnt true most of the time.

Never, ever trust what you find on someone elses bin will even be remotely close or even work for your application.

What your real end goal is if tuning it properly is the least amount of timing coinciding with the best performance.

Like Grumpy beats into people here, give it what it wants not what you think it wants.

U also need to look at whether the modified bins use the PE adder functions or not and what type of fuels and whether the app is now NA or boosted

later
Jeremy
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 02:37 AM
  #3  
396V8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Corvette
Engine: 415
Transmission: six speed
Axle/Gears: Dana44 3.73
Hi Jeremy!!

thank you for your reply....

im running now a near pefect VE table, and about 30°@WOT + 3.9° PE SA makes a total of 34°

this is, what most consider as "normal" spark table, not too mild, not too radical...

i´ve also seen, good Chambers need less timing, bigger chambers a bit more...

sound 34° reasonable for 72cc comp port AFR heads?

regards
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #4  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
One thing about timing is that its not about having the most timing, the least ammount of timing, but the right ammount of timing. Ideally, you want the mixture to be fully burned by the time the piston has just passed TDC to make peak power. Is some cases, though, the engine may go into detontion before this point, so you may have to run less, which is probably why the factory tables look the way they do, as the car has to both run well in all climates, and not go into detonation. The stock timing tables are usually very conservitave. Most engines will run like crap (drink gas, lack performance) on the stock timing tables.

On the other hand, too much timing will cause the motor to also lack power, and overheat as your compressing a hot, burned mixture, which dumps a lot of heat into the pistons and chambers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Red iroc-z 305
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 30, 2015 05:22 PM
tricky1
Exhaust
4
Aug 23, 2015 01:17 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
Bryan F
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 18, 2015 02:28 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.