DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

747 AMUM Problem Burning new chips

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #1  
Al Miles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley area of PA
Car: $150 82 Camaro
Engine: 406 when my ship comes in
Transmission: 6 speed Richmond (its that ship business again)
747 AMUM Problem Burning new chips

I am using a 747 with AMUM as it is the stock setup on my 90 350 4wd 2500 pickup. I have added a reworked stock intake to accept a Holley 670 cfm TBI (2" throttle bores), replaced the stock fuel pump with a 350 TPI pump, set the fuel pressure to 20 PSI, added a Mallory Hyfire IV ignition, coated Flowtech afterburn headers, fabricated a 3" Y pipe installed a 3" HP converter and Hearthrob 3" single exhaust system. I have a UV eraser, Pocket Programmer II and am using WinALDL and TunerPro.

I am having a problem when burning chips. I erased a chip, reprogramed the stock settings for a new BPW constant, changed the Main Spark Table, the Main Fuel Tables #1 and #2, and the PE table. I saved the new file and then I compared the two files. I noticed that the all of my changes were on the comparison as well as two additional positions that I did not change. On position 0000000 the first two alphanumeric changed from 82 (stock) to 88 on the modified program. Position 00000001 changed from 3A to 59. When I tried to program the chip which was verified as erased, the chip did not program but the chip was nolonger blank. It filled position 00000000 with 88 and stopped programming. I can reprogram a blank chip with the stock program. Can someone please explain what I need to do to correct this problem?

Last edited by Al Miles; Jan 7, 2007 at 09:00 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #2  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
The first two locations changed as they are the checksum. Whenever any location in the BIN has been changed usually the check value will also change.

RBob.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #3  
Al Miles's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley area of PA
Car: $150 82 Camaro
Engine: 406 when my ship comes in
Transmission: 6 speed Richmond (its that ship business again)
Thank you for this information. Does this mean I have an incorrect check sum that is preventing the chip from programming? If so what is the best way to solve the problem? If not what else can cause the problem?

Al
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #4  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
The checksum is probably OK. It isn't used until the chip is in the ECM, that is when it is checked (at key-on).

Which chip are you using? It sounds like the original 2732's, which are not the best around. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't.

RBob.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
ambainb
DFI and ECM
0
Aug 29, 2015 12:43 AM
NWAsonoma
TBI
4
Aug 18, 2015 05:45 PM
Bryan F
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 18, 2015 02:28 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.