Most cost-efficient wideband (that works)??

Subscribe
Jan 25, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #1  
Well I've gotten to the point where I want to add a wideband O2 to my IROC as a permanent install for tuning/logging. I've heard a lot of good things about the DIY-WBO2, and I can handle building it, but I can't find anything on how to get my hands on a board and a component list. So I'm wondering: is it still available? Or is Innovate going to be my best bet? Or is there something else out there? I've searched and seen a couple of threads about the JAW setup but there seems to be some debate about the quality of the design and I want something that I can trust my engine to.

Any thoughts?
Reply 0
Jan 25, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
Re: Most cost-efficient wideband (that works)??
I think Innovate and Zetronix are most widely used.
Reply 0
Jan 28, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #3  
Re: Most cost-efficient wideband (that works)??
So is the DIY wideband no longer available? I know there was a big stink about design piracy but is it gone altogether now? That's what I'd really like to go with if I can, money is my limiting factor right now and I'd like to save as much of it as possible.
Reply 0
Jan 28, 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #4  
Re: Most cost-efficient wideband (that works)??
I've been looking to get a wide band system also and one thing I liked about the Zetronix is that it has a faster sampling rate than the Innovate, 74 samps/sec versus 12 samps/sec. This is important for tuning AE mode. This info goes a couple of months back, so get current specs if this is important to you.

Paul T.
Reply 0
Jan 28, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #5  
Re: Most cost-efficient wideband (that works)??
Just ordered my WBO2 this morning: http://www.moates.net/product_info.p...products_id=88
Reply 0
Subscribe