DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #1  
95chevyTBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: texas
Car: no, truck
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: ?
ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

i have a 95 chevy truck with the 7427 ecm that i plan on tuning myself. my question is what is the diference between the ostrich and the apu1. they are both emulators so why is the apu1 more expensive than the ostrich?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #2  
snardos's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Kingsville, Ontario
Car: 1992 camaro z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73:1
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

The ostrich is only an emulator where the apu1 also has a chip burner built in and I believe it also has a datalogging feature built in as well so you don't need the aldu1 either.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #3  
95chevyTBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: texas
Car: no, truck
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

so with the ostrich and using tunerpro rt i would still need more hardware to change my stock tune?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

If you leave the Ostrich hooked up all the time, then no you dont need anything extra.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #5  
luvofjah's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 20
From: PNW
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

Ostrich is like having a tunable chip...
You still need additional hardware to monitor (ALDL) what is happening...

APU1 does both, + Chip Burning... Ostrich would need ALDL cable and can't burn chips....

Rafael
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #6  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 18
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

As stated the APU1 is basically an "All in one".

I prefer the seperate idea, and it has to do with failure. Face it these are electronics and they fail for what seems like no reason sosmetimes. So If one part developes a problem, say the programmer section on the APU1, the entire deal has to go back to be serviced/repaired, where as going the seperate route, (Ostrich, ALDU1, BURN2), if one section fails, then you still have the other two parts to continue doing what you need to do.

I know there would also be times where all I want to do is datalog without emulating and to use the entire APU1 seems overkill just to datalog.

I love the idea of the APU1, I've just had experiance with other "All in one" electronics (Home stereo/theatre) where owning an all in one, means that the entire piece has to go away and are not able to listen to the radio/surround sound when the DVD player needs servicing.

The APU1 has a few adantages over the seperates idea though.
The APU1 also has the ability to add a few A/D channels to the log chain, with an addition piece (the APADC), comes with a free licence for Tuner Pro RT and is a single cable input to the laptop. Buying an Ostrich 2.0 gets you a discount on the TP RT licence though.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #7  
luvofjah's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 20
From: PNW
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

The "failure" route can go a step further...

The APU1 has the advantage of burning your final chip and putting that in the car with no Ostrich or APU1...


Raf
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #8  
chevy1500z71's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: Chevy truck
Engine: supercharged 355 tbi
Transmission: NV4500 manual
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt w/4.56 and detroit locker
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

hey, i have the same exact truck as you. i have tunerpro rt on my laptop, and i have a ostrich emulator on its way as well as a datalog cable, thats all you should need.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #9  
95chevyTBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: texas
Car: no, truck
Engine: 5.7 tbi
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: ostrich 2.0 vs. apu1

it seems to me that im leaning towards the ostrich. now i have a good understanding of what both of them do. thanks for the replies!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UltRoadWarrior9
Tech / General Engine
336
Apr 28, 2020 10:39 PM
seiplentz
DFI and ECM
35
Aug 19, 2019 06:02 PM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
3.8TransAM
Body
2
Sep 17, 2015 02:16 PM
355tpipickup
DFI and ECM
2
Aug 19, 2015 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.