Automatic SA table as a starting point for a Manual trans car?
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Automatic SA table as a starting point for a Manual trans car?
Hi all. My Vortec TPI swap in my GTA is almost done, so it's time to start thinking about developing a reasonable tune as a starting point. I'm a novice tuner... I built the tune for the same motor when it was in my IROC, although my knowledge at the time was quite limited. That tune was a modified APYP tune that had a ton of spark advance, which my old 461 fuelie heads needed. The same motor has Vortec heads now, so I've been searching for a spark advance table to use as a starting point. For the most part, all of the vortec-specific maps are for an automatic, as is the often referred-to Caprice LT1 spark map. I came across one here for an LT1 T56 f-body, but that table seemed to have a lot more SA than I would expect to be ideal for Vortec heads.
If I grab that Caprice SA table, how far off is it going to be for my manual transmission application? Is it going to be good enough for me to at least drive the car and start doing some data acquisition?
If I grab that Caprice SA table, how far off is it going to be for my manual transmission application? Is it going to be good enough for me to at least drive the car and start doing some data acquisition?
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Automatic SA table as a starting point for a Manual trans car?
Just about anything will work as a starting point. Wouldnt use a lt1 t56 one or 113 L98 tables peak values but you can take them and cut out say 5 deg for now.
Or try a manual 305 tpi car one. They all will work for starters, fueling is more inportant to get close first, then adjust spark. Vortecs i would try 30-32 deg peak trq wot and 32-34 peak hp rpm depending on your comp and cam size. If closer to pump gas limits back down a few. If lower then it may need more.
Idle areas 20-30 deg dependin on cam size
monster cam needs timing 28-30. Stocker cam, stock timing 20-24. Middle ground cruise areas will just be a mix of inbetween values and some slightly higher like low load higher rpm areas, 36-38 deg. Shouldnt need much more than that imo but give it a shot. They are suppose to have very good chambers and i would treat them like newer faster burn designs like AFR eliminators. They dont seem to require alot of timing
Or try a manual 305 tpi car one. They all will work for starters, fueling is more inportant to get close first, then adjust spark. Vortecs i would try 30-32 deg peak trq wot and 32-34 peak hp rpm depending on your comp and cam size. If closer to pump gas limits back down a few. If lower then it may need more.
Idle areas 20-30 deg dependin on cam size
monster cam needs timing 28-30. Stocker cam, stock timing 20-24. Middle ground cruise areas will just be a mix of inbetween values and some slightly higher like low load higher rpm areas, 36-38 deg. Shouldnt need much more than that imo but give it a shot. They are suppose to have very good chambers and i would treat them like newer faster burn designs like AFR eliminators. They dont seem to require alot of timing Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: Automatic SA table as a starting point for a Manual trans car?
Hopefully my fueling is going to be ok. I don't expect fuel to be drastically different than it was with the old heads. While my old tune was hardly optimized, it was good enough to keep my BLMs close to 128 pretty much everywhere, and the wideband o2 stuck in the tailpipe during my dyno runs seemed to indicate a pretty good mixture.
Overall, the Caprice table doesn't sound a heck of a lot different than what you're describing, so I'll start with that and make some tweaks once I get my datalogging set up. With the IROC I just used a handheld auto x-ray and observed everything in real time, but this time around I want to pick up one of the Moates data loggers. In the meantime, I just want a "ballpark" tune to use to get the car running and driving so I can have something to sort out all of the inevitable external issues I'm sure I'll have.
Overall, the Caprice table doesn't sound a heck of a lot different than what you're describing, so I'll start with that and make some tweaks once I get my datalogging set up. With the IROC I just used a handheld auto x-ray and observed everything in real time, but this time around I want to pick up one of the Moates data loggers. In the meantime, I just want a "ballpark" tune to use to get the car running and driving so I can have something to sort out all of the inevitable external issues I'm sure I'll have.
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: Automatic SA table as a starting point for a Manual trans car?
Yeah, but there was a lot of banter about that SA table being good for Vortec heads, but to me it looks totally wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM









