DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 02:35 PM
  #1  
ZaphodB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?

Hi!

I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.

As most of you, I have been experimenting with making my own chip using the ARAP code as the starting point, so the question I have is:

I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?

I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 06:54 PM
  #2  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
What do you plan to do regarding fuel while under boost? Most SC TPI cars easily max the MAF and this will need to be addressed.

The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 08:20 PM
  #3  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?

Originally posted by ZaphodB

I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.

I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?

I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
Using a 165 with a blower is at best a miserable situation.
You'll be out of resolution becuase of the MAFs limitation at like 2,500 rpm.

If you running anything resembling serious boost you'll want about 17d total timing, and lots of fuel.

You need to investigate the 1227749 ecm that was used in the Syclones, or develope a system to use the late LS1 MAF with the 165. **ALL** you need to do is connect the LS1 MAF in series with the oem one (mechanically), and data logg the two, then figure out a way to convert the signal and interolate the higher airflow rates.

YMMV
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 02:18 AM
  #4  
ZaphodB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA
What do you plan to do regarding fuel while under boost? Most SC TPI cars easily max the MAF and this will need to be addressed.

The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
The installation kit also comes with a progressive fuel pressure regulator (increases fuel pressure as the boost increases) and an extra inline fuel pump. According to the manual that should work with a stock chip, but since the car runs much better with the ARAP code I figured that it'd be a good idea to take some of the stock tables and copy them to the ARAP bin and then start again from scraptch....

I want to try this first if possible, if it doesn't work out, I'll get another ECM (Speed density) and start over again.

Since this is a stock engine, I'll only put 10 PSI of boost on it, that is what ATI said was safe for an L98 TPI with intercooler....
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 02:24 AM
  #5  
ZaphodB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Re: Re: Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?

Originally posted by Grumpy


Using a 165 with a blower is at best a miserable situation.
You'll be out of resolution becuase of the MAFs limitation at like 2,500 rpm.

If you running anything resembling serious boost you'll want about 17d total timing, and lots of fuel.

You need to investigate the 1227749 ecm that was used in the Syclones, or develope a system to use the late LS1 MAF with the 165. **ALL** you need to do is connect the LS1 MAF in series with the oem one (mechanically), and data logg the two, then figure out a way to convert the signal and interolate the higher airflow rates.

YMMV
I am aware that the 165 is not the best for use with a blower, but I do not intend to use more than 10 PSI of boost until I have rebuilt this engine. I don't think a stock motor will take more than that even with intercooler....

Do you have the part number of the LS1 MAF?

Because I think this might be a project more than I can benefit from, and I have worked with microcontrollers before, so I don't think making a conversion box would be a too-hard project to accomplish.

I think that the first thing I want to do is just assemble the blower kit as-is and then when I first got it running figure out how to perfect it, maybe the 1227749 is the best way to go, but it's not easy to find those where I live. Probably only exists a few Cyclones/Typhoons in the whole country
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 04:09 AM
  #6  
kevinc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 3
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Might not be as hard to find a '749 ECM as you think...get on

http://www.car-parts.com/

Look up the "computer" for the Sy-Ty application, the site will return a list of all available including cross-ref platforms. Call the lowest-cost junkyard and you're in business.

I just jumped on and searched on 1993 GMC Typhoon, it returned 10 pages of listings...avg price looks like $50 or so.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #7  
afgun's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 10
From: New Yuck
Car: Non F-body :(
Engine: Pontiac 301
Transmission: TH350
Hmmmm what MEMCAL would you use for a blown v8 application then? Was there a factory forced-air v8 for this ecm?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 03:58 PM
  #8  
SATURN5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
you need a V8 memcal from a 90-92 TPI SD and burn the eprom with modifed $58 code. I (with a little luck) hopefully will be firing up my Malibu running a '749 with a V8 memcal (using the 1 BAR MAP option) N/A this weekend. If all goes well I will post back with results and notes. cheers, Bob
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2002 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
afgun's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 10
From: New Yuck
Car: Non F-body :(
Engine: Pontiac 301
Transmission: TH350
Hey, thanks Bob!

This sounds like what I want to be doing then, as I'm eventually going to get that Vortech on my motor *G*. Now that it's starting to warm up, maybe I'll get my butt into the garage and start swinging wrenches
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
sweet_87_iroc
Exterior Parts for Sale
7
Mar 27, 2016 04:05 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
Aug 31, 2015 12:02 PM
ZZ42Fast
TPI
3
Aug 30, 2015 02:39 PM
mhatfield 14
Electronics
0
Aug 15, 2015 10:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 PM.