Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?
Hi!
I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.
As most of you, I have been experimenting with making my own chip using the ARAP code as the starting point, so the question I have is:
I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?
I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.
As most of you, I have been experimenting with making my own chip using the ARAP code as the starting point, so the question I have is:
I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?
I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
What do you plan to do regarding fuel while under boost? Most SC TPI cars easily max the MAF and this will need to be addressed.
The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?
Originally posted by ZaphodB
I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.
I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?
I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
I am going to install an ATI Procharger on my IROC quite soon, and in the install guide they say that I need to run it with the stock chip to avoid problems with detonation.
I know I will have to start all over again from the stock chip, but if I want to use the ARAP code, what tables do I need from my stock chip except for Spark, MAF and EGR, or should I just get all of them?
I've been told that the main thing about the ARAP code is that it has got a way too agresive spark table for use with blowers, NOS os anything like that.... Any good suggestions on where to start on this new venture?
You'll be out of resolution becuase of the MAFs limitation at like 2,500 rpm.
If you running anything resembling serious boost you'll want about 17d total timing, and lots of fuel.
You need to investigate the 1227749 ecm that was used in the Syclones, or develope a system to use the late LS1 MAF with the 165. **ALL** you need to do is connect the LS1 MAF in series with the oem one (mechanically), and data logg the two, then figure out a way to convert the signal and interolate the higher airflow rates.
YMMV
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA
What do you plan to do regarding fuel while under boost? Most SC TPI cars easily max the MAF and this will need to be addressed.
The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
What do you plan to do regarding fuel while under boost? Most SC TPI cars easily max the MAF and this will need to be addressed.
The 165 isn't really the best choice for boost application.
I want to try this first if possible, if it doesn't work out, I'll get another ECM (Speed density) and start over again.
Since this is a stock engine, I'll only put 10 PSI of boost on it, that is what ATI said was safe for an L98 TPI with intercooler....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Car: Camaro IROC-Z '89
Engine: 350 TPI /w Procharger P1SC
Transmission: TH700R4 with Transgo shiftkit
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner
Re: Re: Modifying ARAP code for user with a blower?
Originally posted by Grumpy
Using a 165 with a blower is at best a miserable situation.
You'll be out of resolution becuase of the MAFs limitation at like 2,500 rpm.
If you running anything resembling serious boost you'll want about 17d total timing, and lots of fuel.
You need to investigate the 1227749 ecm that was used in the Syclones, or develope a system to use the late LS1 MAF with the 165. **ALL** you need to do is connect the LS1 MAF in series with the oem one (mechanically), and data logg the two, then figure out a way to convert the signal and interolate the higher airflow rates.
YMMV
Using a 165 with a blower is at best a miserable situation.
You'll be out of resolution becuase of the MAFs limitation at like 2,500 rpm.
If you running anything resembling serious boost you'll want about 17d total timing, and lots of fuel.
You need to investigate the 1227749 ecm that was used in the Syclones, or develope a system to use the late LS1 MAF with the 165. **ALL** you need to do is connect the LS1 MAF in series with the oem one (mechanically), and data logg the two, then figure out a way to convert the signal and interolate the higher airflow rates.
YMMV
Do you have the part number of the LS1 MAF?
Because I think this might be a project more than I can benefit from, and I have worked with microcontrollers before, so I don't think making a conversion box would be a too-hard project to accomplish.
I think that the first thing I want to do is just assemble the blower kit as-is and then when I first got it running figure out how to perfect it, maybe the 1227749 is the best way to go, but it's not easy to find those where I live. Probably only exists a few Cyclones/Typhoons in the whole country
Might not be as hard to find a '749 ECM as you think...get on
http://www.car-parts.com/
Look up the "computer" for the Sy-Ty application, the site will return a list of all available including cross-ref platforms. Call the lowest-cost junkyard and you're in business.
I just jumped on and searched on 1993 GMC Typhoon, it returned 10 pages of listings...avg price looks like $50 or so.
http://www.car-parts.com/
Look up the "computer" for the Sy-Ty application, the site will return a list of all available including cross-ref platforms. Call the lowest-cost junkyard and you're in business.
I just jumped on and searched on 1993 GMC Typhoon, it returned 10 pages of listings...avg price looks like $50 or so.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
you need a V8 memcal from a 90-92 TPI SD and burn the eprom with modifed $58 code. I (with a little luck) hopefully will be firing up my Malibu running a '749 with a V8 memcal (using the 1 BAR MAP option) N/A this weekend. If all goes well I will post back with results and notes. cheers, Bob
Senior Member


Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 10
From: New Yuck
Car: Non F-body :(
Engine: Pontiac 301
Transmission: TH350
Hey, thanks Bob!
This sounds like what I want to be doing then, as I'm eventually going to get that Vortech on my motor *G*. Now that it's starting to warm up, maybe I'll get my butt into the garage and start swinging wrenches
This sounds like what I want to be doing then, as I'm eventually going to get that Vortech on my motor *G*. Now that it's starting to warm up, maybe I'll get my butt into the garage and start swinging wrenches
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




