DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Hyper Tech Chip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2002 | 06:41 PM
  #1  
chevyo3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Brackney ,PA
Car: 87 Camaro Sportscoupe
Engine: LG4
Hyper Tech Chip

I went today to price headers for my LG4 305. The guy behind the counter told me I should put a performance chip in. He said this would add about 25HP. The chip he reccommended was a Hyper Tech Street Runner Power Chip PN#12061. Has anyone else tried this with a LG4? I still feel headers ,and 3" cat back would be better ,but can I get good HP increase from just a chip change in my ECM? Would like to get to 240hp . Any feedback on this would be great.:hail:
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2002 | 08:20 PM
  #2  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Yes, you can get a good performance increase with a custom eprom - provided you burn it yourself.

"Off-the-shelf" eproms like Hypertech do very little. I suggest doing a search on "Hypertech", "ADS" or "Jet" and read up. Anyone that has look "inside" can attest that the changes are very minnimal and a complete waste of money.

Frankly, the FIRST mod you should consider is getting the eprom burning equipment and learn to tune your engine. The best time to learn eprom burning is on a basically stock engine - and even that can get a nice performance increase along with a lot of other benefits like improved driveability and better gas mileage.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2002 | 08:44 PM
  #3  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Hyper Tech Chip

Originally posted by chevyo3
I went today to price headers for my LG4 305. The guy behind the counter told me I should put a performance chip in. He said this would add about 25HP. The chip he reccommended was a Hyper Tech Street Runner Power Chip PN#12061. Has anyone else tried this with a LG4? I still feel headers ,and 3" cat back would be better ,but can I get good HP increase from just a chip change in my ECM? Would like to get to 240hp . Any feedback on this would be great.:hail:
Buy Doug Roes book on the Q-Jet, and you can make a difference, changing a chip on an LG4 hardly matters, with a stock carb.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2002 | 09:31 AM
  #4  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Re: Re: Hyper Tech Chip

Originally posted by Grumpy
changing a chip on an LG4 hardly matters, with a stock carb.
I was quickly answering a bunch of similar questions (off-the-shelf eproms) when I replied to this post. I missed the LG4 part.

Yeah, I agree with Bruce. The LG4 chip does very little, mostly timing - that's about it. Waste of money period.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2002 | 09:39 PM
  #5  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
You will definitely get more out of headers & a catback than an aftermarket prom. While you might be able to burn a PROM & see good gains on the LG4, freeing up the exhaust is a big gain. The LG4 & L69 exh. manifolds are smaller than the TPI ones.

I have run an 87 G-body L69 w/ and w/out aftermarket prom. I have run an 86 G-body L69 w/ LB9 injection w/ and w/out headers, and based on all the miles I've put on the combos... the headers are the way to go.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
Feb 22, 2022 09:26 PM
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM
jaridjohn
Exhaust
14
Oct 5, 2015 07:01 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.