Electronics Need help wiring something up? Thinking of adding an electrical component to your car? Need help troubleshooting that wiring glitch?

Vats Confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2011 | 07:21 PM
  #1  
z28dug's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: MD
Vats Confusion

I have an 89 IROC with the 5.7 and have been lurking here every now and again.

I've been having an intermittent no crank issue. I believe the issue is the VATS module. I know I have the 1.13 resistor in my key and when I check the resistance at the plug that goes into the pass key module I have the correct resistance. Even though my key reads correctly I have done the resistor key bypass with the correct resistor just to be safe.

I want to just go ahead and totally bypass the VATS system.

I've read all the threads I can find here and that leads me to some confusion...hopefully some of you can clear that confusion up.

There seems to be 2 schools of thought on how to jump the starter engage relay behind the drivers kick panel. One is to jump the two thick wires and the other is to ground the yellow and black wire.

Which is correct? Does not matter or does it depend on the model?

In addition I have read some folks say that jumping that relay is all that needs to be done on an 89 to totally bypass VATS? Is that correct? Does and 89 need the bypass module like the one from Baker Electronics to energize the injectors?

Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2011 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
camaronewbie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Vats Confusion

VATS does 2 things ... 1) disables the starter via the starter enable relay you mention, and 2) disables the fuel injectors by not sending the correct pulse wave signal to the ECM.

So - bypassing the starter enable relay is only half the issue - the only way to satisfy both issues is with a box like you mentioned.

BUT - I wouldnt bother with a box - you have another issue somewhere. If you've done the resistor, then you've already bypassed the VATS. If the car EVER starts and runs, then your bypass is working correctly.

Your issue is with the ignition circuit, and the purple wire running to the starter. It may always get 12 volts, but might not ever get enough amps for the starter to do anything but "click" once.

I'd follow this diagnostic, and check the neutral safety switch and the ignition switch: http://www.tacreationsusa.com/images...s/dsc00693.JPG

Keep this in mind also:

I had issues with mine - turned out after 3 years of fighting it, and replacing everything and bypassing everything, that all along my issue was a bad connection between the NSS and it's connector. It would not stay connected entirely right - a 10cent zip tie solved my starting problem ... of course in the process I bought a new starter, ignition switch, and NSS - so it was an expensive lesson to learn.

Good luck
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 05:43 AM
  #3  
z28dug's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: Vats Confusion

Originally Posted by camaronewbie
So - bypassing the starter enable relay is only half the issue - the only way to satisfy both issues is with a box like you mentioned.

BUT - I wouldnt bother with a box - you have another issue somewhere. If you've done the resistor, then you've already bypassed the VATS. If the car EVER starts and runs, then your bypass is working correctly.

Your issue is with the ignition circuit, and the purple wire running to the starter. It may always get 12 volts, but might not ever get enough amps for the starter to do anything but "click" once.
You may be correct that my occasional no crank issue is not VATS related. That is why I want to take VATS totally out of the loop. It seems to be the weakest link on these vehicles.

Plugging in the resistor does not bypass the VATS. All it does is make the VATS module think the correct key is in the switch. There could still be a problem with the rest of the VATS.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 08:34 AM
  #4  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Vats Confusion

Originally Posted by z28dug
There seems to be 2 schools of thought
One is to jump the two thick wires and the other is to ground the yellow and black wire.
Which is correct?.
Jumping the two thick wires completely remove the relay from the stater circuit.
Is only there as a interrupt device; not a "true" relay supplying power direct from batt as in a reg installation so not required.

The other method retains the relay and makes it operate when starter engaged.Personally just leaving another item to possibly fail in the circuit

Originally Posted by z28dug
I have an 89 IROC
ground the yellow and black wire.
Check your starter enable relay colors

1989_body_wiring
http://www.austinthirdgen.org/mkport..._continued.gif

Last edited by vetteoz; Aug 8, 2011 at 08:37 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galaxie500XL
History / Originality
42
Feb 1, 2020 04:53 AM
RS Reaper
Electronics
4
Oct 17, 2018 07:52 PM
AmorgetRS
Electronics
6
Sep 28, 2015 09:33 PM
sahlomonic
Electronics
7
Sep 20, 2015 07:15 PM
Winchester1094
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Sep 15, 2015 09:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.