Parking lights staying on
Parking lights staying on
Hello, I'm new here I just got ahold of this 89 iroc-z. It has an issue where when you hook the battery up the parking lights stay on? Even when the key is out. I read where the radio could be the cause but I took the aftermarket radio out completely and it stays on? I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this but figured it had something to do with electronics. You guys got any ideas?
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Parking lights staying on
The park lights and even the headlights and brake lights will operate with the key in the off position. This is a safety feature.
If the light switch is in the fully off position, either the switch is bad, or someone hacked up the wiring.
RBob.
If the light switch is in the fully off position, either the switch is bad, or someone hacked up the wiring.
RBob.
Supreme Member




Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 448
From: WA
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt / 2.77 Posi
Re: Parking lights staying on
Pull one fuse at a time until they go off, then you've isolated the problem to something in that circuit.
Re: Parking lights staying on
Supreme Member




Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 785
From: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Parking lights staying on
There are good arguments for both sides on this Forum.
I went searching for Original-Documents at the closest GM Corporate-Office, to where I live.
This was in 2011, in NY.
On many occasions... I have found that many GM Documents, that contain any information concerning sensitive topics...
to be intentionally unclear in vernacular, structure and any definitive terminology...
appearing to be written/ typed by Lawyers/ Legal-Professionals.
My best guess, from reading GM Documents from 1986/ 1987... regarding the Camaro.
It would appear that certain States and Automotive-Insurance Legal professionals were pushing GM/ the Chevrolet Division (and even the Corvette Sub-Division)...
towards the use of the 115/ 110 Mph Speedometers over the 145/ 140 Mph Speedometers, for the majority of Camaro Sub-Models.
There was no specific mention of which Sub-Models (Sport-Coupe, Berlinetta, LT, RS, Z28, IROC-Z28) were of more concern.
However, there seemed to be less fuss, in regard to "more expensively built" Camaros...
Maybe the Government was content, when receiving more Tax-Dollars from Higher-Priced Camaros.
I do not believe there will ever be a clean-cut answer...
Everything written on this matter is as un-clear and vague as can be!
Re: Parking lights staying on
There still seems to be a Debate over this.
There are good arguments for both sides on this Forum.
I went searching for Original-Documents at the closest GM Corporate-Office, to where I live.
This was in 2011, in NY.
On many occasions... I have found that many GM Documents, that contain any information concerning sensitive topics...
to be intentionally unclear in vernacular, structure and any definitive terminology...
appearing to be written/ typed by Lawyers/ Legal-Professionals.
My best guess, from reading GM Documents from 1986/ 1987... regarding the Camaro.
It would appear that certain States and Automotive-Insurance Legal professionals were pushing GM/ the Chevrolet Division (and even the Corvette Sub-Division)...
towards the use of the 115/ 110 Mph Speedometers over the 145/ 140 Mph Speedometers, for the majority of Camaro Sub-Models.
There was no specific mention of which Sub-Models (Sport-Coupe, Berlinetta, LT, RS, Z28, IROC-Z28) were of more concern.
However, there seemed to be less fuss, in regard to "more expensively built" Camaros...
Maybe the Government was content, when receiving more Tax-Dollars from Higher-Priced Camaros.
I do not believe there will ever be a clean-cut answer...
Everything written on this matter is as un-clear and vague as can be!

There are good arguments for both sides on this Forum.
I went searching for Original-Documents at the closest GM Corporate-Office, to where I live.
This was in 2011, in NY.
On many occasions... I have found that many GM Documents, that contain any information concerning sensitive topics...
to be intentionally unclear in vernacular, structure and any definitive terminology...
appearing to be written/ typed by Lawyers/ Legal-Professionals.
My best guess, from reading GM Documents from 1986/ 1987... regarding the Camaro.
It would appear that certain States and Automotive-Insurance Legal professionals were pushing GM/ the Chevrolet Division (and even the Corvette Sub-Division)...
towards the use of the 115/ 110 Mph Speedometers over the 145/ 140 Mph Speedometers, for the majority of Camaro Sub-Models.
There was no specific mention of which Sub-Models (Sport-Coupe, Berlinetta, LT, RS, Z28, IROC-Z28) were of more concern.
However, there seemed to be less fuss, in regard to "more expensively built" Camaros...
Maybe the Government was content, when receiving more Tax-Dollars from Higher-Priced Camaros.
I do not believe there will ever be a clean-cut answer...
Everything written on this matter is as un-clear and vague as can be!

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




