LT1 Or LS1
LT1 Or LS1
K well i got an oppurtunity to pick up either an lt1w/65k(2500 w/trans) or an ls1 w/32k(2000 w/o trans). Both of the mcome compete so thats no problem and i even have a trans for the ls1 if needed. However, i was jsut wondering whatt one would be a better investment. I want to go ls1 with a cam, but if the install is to hard then ill forget it. If the lt1 install is easier then ill go with an lt4 hotcam and head porting to get it up to an ls1. I was jsut wondering if it would be mnuch easier to go lt1 or would an ls1 mod be ok. Thanks
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
You'll run 11's to low 12's with the LS1 and a cam. To get it in there, you'll need new motor mounts, transmission, and tranny crossmember. Unless you're using the 700r4 (which is the same thing as the 4l60E). The 700 will bolt up, but you'll need to do some tuning with the PCM because the 4L60 is electronically controlled. Only thing is though, you can't use headers on an LS1 b/c no one makes a set that will clear the framerails of the thirdgen.
The LT1 will be an easier swap, but you won't notice that much of a difference from the L98 b/c it's almost the same motor jus twith a different intake. I personally hate the LT1 b/c they're a pain in the butt to work on and I have no idea what GM was thinking when they designed the Opti-Spark.
You're 700 will bolt up to this too and depending on what PCM/ECM you get, you may not have to change anything. The '93 fbody actually came with the 700 tranny which is not computer controlled.
The LS1 would be more fun and faster, but the LT1 would definitely be an easier swap.
The LT1 will be an easier swap, but you won't notice that much of a difference from the L98 b/c it's almost the same motor jus twith a different intake. I personally hate the LT1 b/c they're a pain in the butt to work on and I have no idea what GM was thinking when they designed the Opti-Spark.
You're 700 will bolt up to this too and depending on what PCM/ECM you get, you may not have to change anything. The '93 fbody actually came with the 700 tranny which is not computer controlled. The LS1 would be more fun and faster, but the LT1 would definitely be an easier swap.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
There's not much to the LT1 swap since it's basically the same motor as an L98. Having a donor car would be good. That way if you come across some odds and ends you need, you can just go to the car and get them. You'll need the engine, trans, PCM, wiring harness, an optispark (which you should buy a new one b/c they're a real PITA to replace). To make the swap easier on yourself, it's best to ae a decent garage and the right tools. Be sure to take your time! Anything else just ask or email me.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
A slightly modded LS1, exhaust, headers and a lid, will run somewhere around 12.7x's. With an LT1, I'd say headers, exhaust cutout, 3.73, clutch or convertor, free mods and some sticky tires will get you somewhere around 12.90's. Add a hot cam or cc305 (306 is too big unless you've got some badass heads) and you'll be in the low to mid 12's.
Trending Topics
Guest
Posts: n/a
in GMHP magazine they did a cam swap on an LS6 Z06.. they did not even remove the intake!!!.. they said the lifters would stay in place and long and you rotate the came and you pull it. they did this with the motor still in the car as well. all they did was pull the timing cover,chain, and removed some serpentine acessories. looked pretty easy.
[ 
50-60hp in my book is noticable.
the LT1 engine is one of gm's best engine. first, it is very different then the L98, intake, ignition, cam, cooling systems, heads.
The lt1 are very reliable engine in a way because the waterpump is driven by the camshaft which means that you will never overheat the engine because of the fact that you're serpentine belt snapped and it wont leave you on the side of the road.
The lt1 is a very simple engine, great mpg, great drivability, great torque, great hp and most of all very but very reliable.
As per the optispark, it is not the best design gm ever did but still
works very well if you make sure your watepump seal is not broken and dripping on it.
pain in the butt to work on ???!!!!! say what ??? hmmm....try an LS1 for the fun of it
NastyL98_T/A
The LT1 will be an easier swap, but you won't notice that much of a difference from the L98 b/c it's almost the same motor jus twith a different intake. I personally hate the LT1 b/c they're a pain in the butt to work on
The LT1 will be an easier swap, but you won't notice that much of a difference from the L98 b/c it's almost the same motor jus twith a different intake. I personally hate the LT1 b/c they're a pain in the butt to work on

50-60hp in my book is noticable.
the LT1 engine is one of gm's best engine. first, it is very different then the L98, intake, ignition, cam, cooling systems, heads.
The lt1 are very reliable engine in a way because the waterpump is driven by the camshaft which means that you will never overheat the engine because of the fact that you're serpentine belt snapped and it wont leave you on the side of the road.
The lt1 is a very simple engine, great mpg, great drivability, great torque, great hp and most of all very but very reliable.
As per the optispark, it is not the best design gm ever did but still
works very well if you make sure your watepump seal is not broken and dripping on it.
pain in the butt to work on ???!!!!! say what ??? hmmm....try an LS1 for the fun of it
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Between the pacific and the atlantic
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: too small
Transmission: broken
I have a buddy that just put an LS-1 in his 87 IROC and said it was a huge PITA!!! He had to do alot of modifying to get the LS1 to fit. The LS1 is a smaller block so things have to be moved around. I think he had to mover everything back an inch or two. I am not sure though it has been a long time since I talked to him.
I am soon going to be putting an lt1 with ported heads and a bigger cam into my car. I have asked quite a few people about it and they have told me I will be pushing up on 400 hp if not going a little over.
I am soon going to be putting an lt1 with ported heads and a bigger cam into my car. I have asked quite a few people about it and they have told me I will be pushing up on 400 hp if not going a little over.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 954
Likes: 1
From: Annandale, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: 2001 LS1 Modded
Transmission: 2001 4L60E Yank SS3600 TC
They are both great swaps in my opinon. Each have advantages and disadvantages over the other. However, both will make some great hp with little effort and offer better mileage than the l98.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
Originally posted by mat89RS
[

50-60hp in my book is noticable.
the LT1 engine is one of gm's best engine. first, it is very different then the L98, intake, ignition, cam, cooling systems, heads.
The lt1 are very reliable engine in a way because the waterpump is driven by the camshaft which means that you will never overheat the engine because of the fact that you're serpentine belt snapped and it wont leave you on the side of the road.
The lt1 is a very simple engine, great mpg, great drivability, great torque, great hp and most of all very but very reliable.
As per the optispark, it is not the best design gm ever did but still
works very well if you make sure your watepump seal is not broken and dripping on it.
pain in the butt to work on ???!!!!! say what ??? hmmm....try an LS1 for the fun of it
[

50-60hp in my book is noticable.
the LT1 engine is one of gm's best engine. first, it is very different then the L98, intake, ignition, cam, cooling systems, heads.
The lt1 are very reliable engine in a way because the waterpump is driven by the camshaft which means that you will never overheat the engine because of the fact that you're serpentine belt snapped and it wont leave you on the side of the road.
The lt1 is a very simple engine, great mpg, great drivability, great torque, great hp and most of all very but very reliable.
As per the optispark, it is not the best design gm ever did but still
works very well if you make sure your watepump seal is not broken and dripping on it.
pain in the butt to work on ???!!!!! say what ??? hmmm....try an LS1 for the fun of it
Please, it was just a temporary thing until GM could finish development of the LS1.So yes, I will go work on an LS1 just for fun.
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Between the pacific and the atlantic
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: too small
Transmission: broken
I am not saying by any means that you don't know what you are talking about, but we are talking about thirdgens here. I helped a friend change the plugs on his 95 Z and the biggest reason that changing the plugs was so hard was how cramped the engine bay was. Maybe the design is different so the plugs are easier to change on an LS1 but in a thirdgen I think that an LT1 or an LS1 for that matter would be easier to work on. For me the LT1 swap is just more feasable. This will be my first engine swap so the LT1 will be much easier. Also, the LT1 responds very well to modifications. Yes the LS1 has its advantanges, but what do you expect from a newer engine.
Let's not start a war here but here's my reply, don't take it personal...
the LS1 is a great engine indeed, just not affordable for most of us. like amish_z28 said, what do you expect from newer technology.
Last 2 times I changed my plugs , it was done in less then 20 minutes.
Apparently their isn't any headers for ls1 conversion to 3rdgen.
Regular sbc headers works like a charm on LT1s, very little flange porting has to be done since of the D-shaped exhaust port.
waterpump is driven by the cam, GM did that to remove the excessive side loads on the bearings and seal on regular type waterpump. lt1 waterpumps have been design to last 100 000k
When I did my engine swap, the head gaskets where shot since the engine had sat for 2 years. My waterpump seal blew and leaked at least 15 gallons of coolant on my optispark before it the opti failed the first time. I think that pretty good for a (10 y.o.) 93 opti that's not even vented.
The coolant system is very different from all other sbc, it has steam vents, 2 way thermostat, reverse flow, 4 core rad, dry intake manifold , no gasket on termostat housing, low pressure cooling system, 2 fans.
LT1 aluminum head have a 15% increase in airflow as a result of revised port angles and higher port ceilings when compared to the L98 head. (1991 L98 heads)
LT1 iron head have 20% increase in airflow over the lt1 aluminum heads.
what performance shop are you working for ???
the LS1 is a great engine indeed, just not affordable for most of us. like amish_z28 said, what do you expect from newer technology.
Last 2 times I changed my plugs , it was done in less then 20 minutes.
Apparently their isn't any headers for ls1 conversion to 3rdgen.
Regular sbc headers works like a charm on LT1s, very little flange porting has to be done since of the D-shaped exhaust port.
waterpump is driven by the cam, GM did that to remove the excessive side loads on the bearings and seal on regular type waterpump. lt1 waterpumps have been design to last 100 000k
When I did my engine swap, the head gaskets where shot since the engine had sat for 2 years. My waterpump seal blew and leaked at least 15 gallons of coolant on my optispark before it the opti failed the first time. I think that pretty good for a (10 y.o.) 93 opti that's not even vented.
The coolant system is very different from all other sbc, it has steam vents, 2 way thermostat, reverse flow, 4 core rad, dry intake manifold , no gasket on termostat housing, low pressure cooling system, 2 fans.
LT1 aluminum head have a 15% increase in airflow as a result of revised port angles and higher port ceilings when compared to the L98 head. (1991 L98 heads)
LT1 iron head have 20% increase in airflow over the lt1 aluminum heads.
what performance shop are you working for ???
Last edited by mat89RS; May 14, 2003 at 12:26 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
I work at FBodyCentral here in Maryland. Home to the fastes N/A LT1 in the country and soon to be the fastest LS1 too.
I think I did say in an earlier post that the LT1 would be an easier swap, but that I didn't like the LT1 b/c it was a bear to work on.
I think I did say in an earlier post that the LT1 would be an easier swap, but that I didn't like the LT1 b/c it was a bear to work on.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 954
Likes: 1
From: Annandale, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: 2001 LS1 Modded
Transmission: 2001 4L60E Yank SS3600 TC
What kind of services does FBodyCentral offer? I need to have an exhaust system fabricated soon. I am also considering wideband o2 tuning. Please contact me at your convenience.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
We do everything. What kind of car is it? We can get your exhaust done and we do have access to a dyno with a wideband but unless it's an LS1 or LT1, our tuning capablilites are limited.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 954
Likes: 1
From: Annandale, VA
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: 2001 LS1 Modded
Transmission: 2001 4L60E Yank SS3600 TC
It is a 1991 Formula with a LS1 conversion. The exhaust will be a big pain in the a$$. I have to run dual cats because of the emissions requirements here in NVA.
There are clearence issues with the drivers side because there is no relief in the floor pan. I need a shop that can build it high and tight while maintaining optimum flow.
While I was at I was going to get wideband tuning.
There are clearence issues with the drivers side because there is no relief in the floor pan. I need a shop that can build it high and tight while maintaining optimum flow.
While I was at I was going to get wideband tuning.
Last edited by wm_sorg; May 19, 2003 at 07:05 PM.





