charcoal canister
Re: charcoal canister
Originally posted by sinner
i swaped a 95 LT1 into my car. do i need to somehow hook up the charcoal canister?
i swaped a 95 LT1 into my car. do i need to somehow hook up the charcoal canister?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: umatilla county, or.
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
the fuel line is still connected to the canister, but there is no longer the line going to the engine.
do i need to restore that connection?
is there a way to eliminate the canister if its not being used?
(a filter or something?)
do i need to restore that connection?
is there a way to eliminate the canister if its not being used?
(a filter or something?)
You want to give the fumes a safe escape route, if the LT1 has an evap inlet you could connect that to your cannister.
My cannister was electrically-controlled, and the LS1 I was installing had an evap solenoid on the intake...had to pick one or the other as the switch.
So...I hit the junkyard, found a G-body car that had a cannister same size as mine but no controls...just an inlet and outlet. That works great w/ the LS1 evap solenoid, same size hose fittings and everything.
My cannister was electrically-controlled, and the LS1 I was installing had an evap solenoid on the intake...had to pick one or the other as the switch.
So...I hit the junkyard, found a G-body car that had a cannister same size as mine but no controls...just an inlet and outlet. That works great w/ the LS1 evap solenoid, same size hose fittings and everything.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: umatilla county, or.
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
mine used to be electronicly controlled too. hmm, so i need to find an LT1 guy to ask....so like, hmmm...where to look, what to doo....hahahahahahahaa:lala:
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: South East MI
Car: 1992 Camaro RS AKA Big Nasty
Engine: Carbed '79 350 block, 360hp/380ftlbs (flywheel)
Transmission: 6speed from an unidentified 4th gen. ask me, ill tell you.
you think we could just use vented gas caps?
Trending Topics
I got rid of the entire thing. Canister, vent line, everything, and then capped off the vent line from the tank. I then removed the stock pressure relief valve and replaced it with a K&N breather with a stud that mounts right where the pressure refief valve did. Looks factory
Originally posted by 25THRSS
I got rid of the entire thing. Canister, vent line, everything, and then capped off the vent line from the tank. I then removed the stock pressure relief valve and replaced it with a K&N breather with a stud that mounts right where the pressure refief valve did. Looks factory
I got rid of the entire thing. Canister, vent line, everything, and then capped off the vent line from the tank. I then removed the stock pressure relief valve and replaced it with a K&N breather with a stud that mounts right where the pressure refief valve did. Looks factory
One backfire during a hot restart, after the car's been sitting a while and built up a nice vapor cloud, should invoke a Darwin award.
A vented gas cap would minimize the problem I raised above...it would vent vapors above the car, where they would dissipate.
Venting under the car, where the vapors can accumulate, is dangerous.
Venting under the car, where the vapors can accumulate, is dangerous.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: umatilla county, or.
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
ya we dont have those either
so anyhoo, i guess from all this i still dont know what to do.
do i remove the canister and put a filter on the line from the tank or do i find somewhere on the motor to hook up the canister?
if so where?
so anyhoo, i guess from all this i still dont know what to do.
do i remove the canister and put a filter on the line from the tank or do i find somewhere on the motor to hook up the canister?
if so where?
I was under the impression the charcoal canister only functions after the car is shutoff to recover fuel vapors left in the intake tract. When the car is started the next time, the canister is purged and the vaoprs are burned.
Originally posted by kevinc
So...you're venting gas fumes under the rear of the car, right near the exhaust?
One backfire during a hot restart, after the car's been sitting a while and built up a nice vapor cloud, should invoke a Darwin award.
So...you're venting gas fumes under the rear of the car, right near the exhaust?
One backfire during a hot restart, after the car's been sitting a while and built up a nice vapor cloud, should invoke a Darwin award.
Originally posted by 25THRSS
The factory put the pressure relief valve right there. I highly doubt if it was so dangerous that they would do that. The exhaust doesn't get anywhere near hot enough that far towards the rear to ignite anything.
The factory put the pressure relief valve right there. I highly doubt if it was so dangerous that they would do that. The exhaust doesn't get anywhere near hot enough that far towards the rear to ignite anything.
It's not exhaust pipe heat that would trigger an explosion, it's a tailpipe backfire during startup.
I'm not saying not to do it and I'm not too interesting in arguing beyond what I've posted...if that risk isn't enough to sway opinion, then by all means go for it. Darwin candidates have rights too.
Originally posted by kevinc
The factory did not intend for it to be venting at atmospheric pressure, full time, such as the design above would do.
It's not exhaust pipe heat that would trigger an explosion, it's a tailpipe backfire during startup.
I'm not saying not to do it and I'm not too interesting in arguing beyond what I've posted...if that risk isn't enough to sway opinion, then by all means go for it. Darwin candidates have rights too.
The factory did not intend for it to be venting at atmospheric pressure, full time, such as the design above would do.
It's not exhaust pipe heat that would trigger an explosion, it's a tailpipe backfire during startup.
I'm not saying not to do it and I'm not too interesting in arguing beyond what I've posted...if that risk isn't enough to sway opinion, then by all means go for it. Darwin candidates have rights too.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: South East MI
Car: 1992 Camaro RS AKA Big Nasty
Engine: Carbed '79 350 block, 360hp/380ftlbs (flywheel)
Transmission: 6speed from an unidentified 4th gen. ask me, ill tell you.
once in a lifetime? but still, would you risk it?
Originally posted by 25THRSS
No, they just intended it to open under extreme pressure and vent a large amount of fuel vapors at an excelerated rate. Quit being an ***.
No, they just intended it to open under extreme pressure and vent a large amount of fuel vapors at an excelerated rate. Quit being an ***.
With a functioning charcoal can, you will never, ever build enough pressure at the tank to open that vent. It's a safeguard to prevent the tank from popping in the event of a failure.
Last edited by kevinc; Dec 1, 2004 at 03:34 AM.
Originally posted by TexasLT1
and how often are you going to get a tailpipe backfire on start up with enough fuel vapor underneath the car to start a fire or explosion?
and how often are you going to get a tailpipe backfire on start up with enough fuel vapor underneath the car to start a fire or explosion?

I'll take a swag and say neither GM nor the NHTSA have done failure mode effect analysis on the combo of hacked-up fuel systems and exhaust backfires, so there's not likely any statistically-valid data on that.
Gasoline in vapor form trapped under the car's body is incredibly dangerous stuff, just one flicked cigarette or brake pad worn down to metal-on-metal and you have an ignition source.
Again, this is one of those hacks that only puts the driver and occupants of the car at risk, so I'm not totally against it.
Last edited by kevinc; Dec 1, 2004 at 06:09 AM.
Originally posted by kevinc
Check back w/ us on that when your Opti-Spark lets go.
Check back w/ us on that when your Opti-Spark lets go.
I will. 80K+ miles and going strong. I'm not too worried
And the Opti is a known problem.
Fuel vapor under the car in large enough quantities to excite an explosion due to a rapid venting of built up pressure in the fuel tank during startup when a tail-pipe backfire occurs, not a known problem.
Last edited by TexasLT1; Dec 1, 2004 at 08:16 AM.
Originally posted by TexasLT1
Fuel vapor under the car in large enough quantities to excite an explosion due to a rapid venting of built up pressure in the fuel tank during startup when a tail-pipe backfire occurs, not a known problem.
Fuel vapor under the car in large enough quantities to excite an explosion due to a rapid venting of built up pressure in the fuel tank during startup when a tail-pipe backfire occurs, not a known problem.
May or may not happen during startup, true.
If it were me, and I absolutely had to ditch the charcoal can, I'd cap the line and use a vented gas cap. That way the vapors are vented above the car where they can't be captured in underbody spaces.
Originally posted by kevinc
...says the guy who can't spell 'accelerated' but still feels qualified to give out advice...
With a functioning charcoal can, you will never, ever build enough pressure at the tank to open that vent. It's a safeguard to prevent the tank from popping in the event of a failure.
...says the guy who can't spell 'accelerated' but still feels qualified to give out advice...
With a functioning charcoal can, you will never, ever build enough pressure at the tank to open that vent. It's a safeguard to prevent the tank from popping in the event of a failure.
Last edited by 25THRSS; Dec 1, 2004 at 01:40 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: umatilla county, or.
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
ok guys im lost. it seems to me we have moved past what i was asking to a fun argument. can someone with an LT1 please share with me what they did on thier car?
i wanna remove it if i can, because it isnt doing anything. if there is a way to hook it up and use it, ill do that.
im not gonna vent it under the car, if i do, i am going to put a filter inder the hood. if i do that? what filter do i need to use?
I got rid of it. Shouldn't be a problem to hook it up if you want to keep it. The solenoid on the canister is the same one used on the LT1 I believe, I think it was just mounted on the intake for the 4th gens.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Hattiesburg, MS
Car: '87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700r4
I don't have an LT1, but I did get rid of my charcoal canister. I just poked a couple of holes in my non-vented gas cap. Don't drill holes all the way through it, just puncture the diaphragm from the inside.
Just my opinion but why wouldn’t you just keep the charcoal canister? It doesn’t cause any performance hindrance and keeps the fuel system closed loop, is safer, will allow you to pass any smog test and keeps the air cleaner. If you have the LT1 set up you can mount the canister out of site as the canisters are designed to be mounted in the rear of the car if cosmetics are an issue. Is there a flaw in my thinking?
Originally posted by David Petersen
Just my opinion but why wouldn’t you just keep the charcoal canister? Is there a flaw in my thinking?
Just my opinion but why wouldn’t you just keep the charcoal canister? Is there a flaw in my thinking?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: umatilla county, or.
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
well, im under the idea that if it isnt doing anything i dont want it there, i could move my air filter over there and make my own cold air setup. that was the idea anyway..the canister isnt wired in, and the vacum line that is sposed to go to the motor isnt goin anywhere..so my question was:
a: how do i hook it up
or
b: how do i safely remove it?
a: how do i hook it up
or
b: how do i safely remove it?
Originally posted by TexasLT1
Or...we do have common sense, and realize its not that big of a deal.
Or...we do have common sense, and realize its not that big of a deal.
When you do, you'll have more respect for fuel vapor (if you live).
(kevinc signs off this thread)
I know this is an old thread, but I have to put in my .02 cents. I was at the track yesterday and had fuel slosh out my vented cap during hard cornering. It created a siphonage effect that ran down the side of the car and inside the car on the fuel filler hose down to the exhaust. It ignited a huge ball of flame either during a downshift or when I hit the rev limiter. Scared my buddy that was in hot pursuit. But no major problems other than that. I plugged the cap and no longer had the issues.
Amazingly I found a video of my car at the track from someone behind me when the gas ignited.
Notice the fuel spill around the corner. Lots of mulla on the track
Glad no one was hurt. Good to keep the fuel system a closed system!
http://www.trackvisions.com/track2.wmv
Notice the fuel spill around the corner. Lots of mulla on the track
Glad no one was hurt. Good to keep the fuel system a closed system!http://www.trackvisions.com/track2.wmv
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






