Chevrolet's new zz6?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North West Georgia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z28
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
Chevrolet's new zz6?
We all hear about the conventional lsx swap into basically everything today. Horses ranging from 350 to 600+ and torques that are just as wild. Unfortantly that is what we DO hear about the most. I'm was originally thinking of an LS3 swap with a T56 conversion for my '89 Iroc and have been for many months now but I'm starting to lean towards something different. With the recent release of Chevy's newest turn key engine, the zz6, last November at SEMA, it's turning into and very hard decision. I could either build my own LS3 or I can order a zz6 from Chevy. What do y'all think would be the best option and especially what do you think of the new zz6??? Thanks guys and or gals!
Last edited by Ashton W; 05-29-2016 at 01:38 AM.
#2
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rocky Face, Ga
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula
Engine: 355ci HSR SBC
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Chevrolet's new zz6?
Zz6 would be easy, but I'm my opinion very overpriced. Granted you get a warranty, but you could bid your own gen1 sbc for half what they are charging. It does not NEED 4bolt mains or a forged crank. The fast burn heads are not nearly as good as a set of profilers or AFR.
It's nice, but if you cleaned up a junk yard block and put the parts together yourself, you could save enough to buy a transmission and rear end with the savings.
The cool thing about the LS swap is that power comes easy, as they are very responsive to power upgrades.
Really though, it's always up to you, and what your goals are. 400 crank hp is pretty easy with an gen1. Unless you need or really really want the warranty, I say clean up a good block put some AFR195 heads, a xfi280 cam, some afr 8019 Springs some flat top pistons and a HSR intake. Get it tuned well and you'll see over 400 hp at the crank.
It's nice, but if you cleaned up a junk yard block and put the parts together yourself, you could save enough to buy a transmission and rear end with the savings.
The cool thing about the LS swap is that power comes easy, as they are very responsive to power upgrades.
Really though, it's always up to you, and what your goals are. 400 crank hp is pretty easy with an gen1. Unless you need or really really want the warranty, I say clean up a good block put some AFR195 heads, a xfi280 cam, some afr 8019 Springs some flat top pistons and a HSR intake. Get it tuned well and you'll see over 400 hp at the crank.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sussex County, NJ
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Chevrolet's new zz6?
The ZZ6 has been discussed in the Tech section.
We pretty much came to the conclusion it is an overpriced, slightly improved L31 350 Vortec motor with a cam.
For the price you could build a 383 in the 500 hp range.
Or you could squeak in an LQ4/LQ9 with a cam if you hunt for parts but I don't think it will offer anything more than a properly built 383 without better heads.
We pretty much came to the conclusion it is an overpriced, slightly improved L31 350 Vortec motor with a cam.
For the price you could build a 383 in the 500 hp range.
Or you could squeak in an LQ4/LQ9 with a cam if you hunt for parts but I don't think it will offer anything more than a properly built 383 without better heads.
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
While you indicated some possibilities you have considered, you didn't give us the most important information: What is the car? What engine/induction did it have from the factory and what does it have now? What will you be using the car for? Do you have to go through emissions inspection or testing? What other modifications do you have planned?
I can't recall anyone building their own LS3. What were you planning on starting with? The LS3-based crate engines are pretty impressive in their own right (and the lowest HP version is less than the ZZ6 cost, with more HP).
Regardless of what you do, I think it's safe to say an LS swap will be more expensive and more work. Swap mounts, wiring, and exhaust pretty much guarantee that. There are aftermarket products to support all that (the GM "Connect and Cruise" packages are impressive), but you'd better be prepared to slap down the plastic.
Some people think "everybody is doing an LS swap now", so they're going to stay "old school". Fine. If that's what you want. For sure Gen I will be less expensive in the short run, but when you match HP to HP, the game starts to change. If you don't like oil leaks, then "old school" isn't for you (my LS engines are the most leak-free I've ever had, and I'm not **** about oil leaks). It's pretty hard to beat the driveability and fuel economy of the EFI LS engines for the power levels they produce. It is a bit disappointing GM chose to stick with the old ZZ3/4 cam in the ZZ6, as it isn't all that great (just another $300 or so for you to do it right).
Bottom line, we can give you all sorts of opinions and observations, but only you know what you're really after.
I can't recall anyone building their own LS3. What were you planning on starting with? The LS3-based crate engines are pretty impressive in their own right (and the lowest HP version is less than the ZZ6 cost, with more HP).
Regardless of what you do, I think it's safe to say an LS swap will be more expensive and more work. Swap mounts, wiring, and exhaust pretty much guarantee that. There are aftermarket products to support all that (the GM "Connect and Cruise" packages are impressive), but you'd better be prepared to slap down the plastic.
Some people think "everybody is doing an LS swap now", so they're going to stay "old school". Fine. If that's what you want. For sure Gen I will be less expensive in the short run, but when you match HP to HP, the game starts to change. If you don't like oil leaks, then "old school" isn't for you (my LS engines are the most leak-free I've ever had, and I'm not **** about oil leaks). It's pretty hard to beat the driveability and fuel economy of the EFI LS engines for the power levels they produce. It is a bit disappointing GM chose to stick with the old ZZ3/4 cam in the ZZ6, as it isn't all that great (just another $300 or so for you to do it right).
Bottom line, we can give you all sorts of opinions and observations, but only you know what you're really after.
Last edited by five7kid; 06-08-2016 at 01:36 PM.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: North West Georgia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z28
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
Re: Chevrolet's new zz6?
While you indicated some possibilities you have considered, you didn't give us the most important information: What is the car? What engine/induction did it have from the factory and what does it have now? What will you be using the car for? Do you have to go through emissions inspection or testing? What other modifications do you have planned?
I can't recall anyone building their own LS3. What were you planning on starting with? The LS3-based crate engines are pretty impressive in their own right (and the lowest HP version is than the ZZ6 cost, with more HP).
Regardless of what you do, I think it's safe to say an LS swap will be more expensive and more work. Swap mounts, wiring, and exhaust pretty much guarantee that. There are aftermarket products to support all that (the GM "Connect and Cruise" packages are impressive), but you'd better be prepared to slap down the plastic.
Some people think "everybody is doing an LS swap now", so they're going to stay "old school". Fine. If that's what you want. For sure Gen I will be less expensive in the short run, but when you match HP to HP, the game starts to change. If you don't like oil leaks, then "old school" isn't for you (my LS engines are the most leak-free I've ever had, and I'm not **** about oil leaks). It's pretty hard to beat the driveability and fuel economy of the EFI LS engines for the power levels they produce. It is a bit disappointing GM chose to stick with the old ZZ3/4 cam in the ZZ6, as it isn't all that great (just another $300 or so for you to do it right).
Bottom line, we can give you all sorts of opinions and observations, but only you know what you're really after.
I can't recall anyone building their own LS3. What were you planning on starting with? The LS3-based crate engines are pretty impressive in their own right (and the lowest HP version is than the ZZ6 cost, with more HP).
Regardless of what you do, I think it's safe to say an LS swap will be more expensive and more work. Swap mounts, wiring, and exhaust pretty much guarantee that. There are aftermarket products to support all that (the GM "Connect and Cruise" packages are impressive), but you'd better be prepared to slap down the plastic.
Some people think "everybody is doing an LS swap now", so they're going to stay "old school". Fine. If that's what you want. For sure Gen I will be less expensive in the short run, but when you match HP to HP, the game starts to change. If you don't like oil leaks, then "old school" isn't for you (my LS engines are the most leak-free I've ever had, and I'm not **** about oil leaks). It's pretty hard to beat the driveability and fuel economy of the EFI LS engines for the power levels they produce. It is a bit disappointing GM chose to stick with the old ZZ3/4 cam in the ZZ6, as it isn't all that great (just another $300 or so for you to do it right).
Bottom line, we can give you all sorts of opinions and observations, but only you know what you're really after.
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: Chevrolet's new zz6?
I was rebuilding carburetors before most of you were born. I'm a moderator on the Carburetor forum. That said, I do not now own a vehicle with a carburetor. And I have no intention of going back.
What I would suggest is you look for a long block (assuming you decide not to rebuild your L98) and retain EFI. TPI isn't a "bee's-knees" system, but it isn't hopeless, either. A Holley Stealth Ram solves the main weakness of the system, long runners that limit RPM power (aftermarket base and runners help, but cost a lot more than the Stealth Ram). A ZZ6 long block would actually be a decent choice, as the cam is EFI-friendly (sell off the intake manifold, distributor and water pump that come with it). But I'm sure your L98 could be rebuilt with new cam for a lot less (rebuild the shortblock, add Fast Burn heads and ZZ6 cam, and you'll have basically the same thing as the ZZ6). The thought of a new engine is pretty enticing, though. Add headers and cat-back and you'll have a nice-running, respectable car.
What I would suggest is you look for a long block (assuming you decide not to rebuild your L98) and retain EFI. TPI isn't a "bee's-knees" system, but it isn't hopeless, either. A Holley Stealth Ram solves the main weakness of the system, long runners that limit RPM power (aftermarket base and runners help, but cost a lot more than the Stealth Ram). A ZZ6 long block would actually be a decent choice, as the cam is EFI-friendly (sell off the intake manifold, distributor and water pump that come with it). But I'm sure your L98 could be rebuilt with new cam for a lot less (rebuild the shortblock, add Fast Burn heads and ZZ6 cam, and you'll have basically the same thing as the ZZ6). The thought of a new engine is pretty enticing, though. Add headers and cat-back and you'll have a nice-running, respectable car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post