Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
Cman12345's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Hey everyone, I just found a 4 bolt main core for a decent price. I just looked up the casting numbers and it's apparently a 302 block from a 60s camaro (3970010) from my understanding the only difference between the two engines was the crank and stroke.. so that being said, if I got the 302 block and put a 350 crank with a 3.48" stroke it would be a 350, right? Tia! Wanting to do a 350 build and I think this block is a good start to a budget build.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
CKone's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 458
Likes: 171
From: East Moline, IL
Car: 88 T/A, 91 Formula, 94 Firehawk
Engine: 400 Pontiac, 5.0 TPI, 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 700R4, T5, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10, 3.42, 3.42
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Been a while since I brushed up on my Chevy ID numbers but if I recall there can more than just block number to identify them. For example that block number could have been used across many platforms, but may have stamps like “DZ” to designate it was a 302 Z-28 for instance. Years ago I thought I had stumbled upon a 302 engine based on some block numbers I found and researched. In the end, it was a plain old 327.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 01:56 PM
  #3  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

3970010 is probably the single most common 4" bore block made. It was in 302, 327, & 350 from 69 to 79 or 80. Miraculously, somehow every single one that somebody randomly comes up with, whether from a truck (very common), an Impala 2-bbl (even more common) or WHATEVER, magically and automatically becomes a "69 302" or "70 LT-1". Which is more or less irrelevant anyway; a block is a block is a block is a block is a block as far as any of that goes, once you take the guts out of it. You can take the lowliest 350 2-bbl block and turn it into a 750 HP race motor, or take a "LT-1" block and turn it into a 160 HP smogger turd, according to what heads, cam, pistons, etc. you put into it.

Yes you can put a 3.48" crank in it, and of course pistons with the right deck height, and turn it into a 350. Since of course that's what all those 70s 350s that GM built with that casting # had in them.

In 2020, I would NOT use a 70s block, ANY 70s block no matter how romantic some of the applications of its casting # might sound, as the starting point for ANY kind of build, other than a "numbers matching" deal. Which if that's REALLY one of the last 3 302 blocks with the right FACTORY stamping #s on it for a 302 still left in the wild, some early Z28 person would SNAP IT UP at a high enough price to buy several dozen FAR BETTER (roller cam, modern quality control) 350 blocks.

In short, not a great idea.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 02:57 PM
  #4  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Incidentally, post up the casting date.



It's 4 characters (1 letter, 3 numbers) in that raised obround feature just to the right of the cyan rectangle around the casting # in the pic.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
BIRD91ZRAG's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 356
Likes: 76
From: Ft Wayne In
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Incidentally, post up the casting date.



It's 4 characters (1 letter, 3 numbers) in that raised obround feature just to the right of the cyan rectangle around the casting # in the pic.
Yeah, just in case it's actually one of the few blocks that's worth anything.. actually theres a set of numbers stamped onto the head surface of the front passenger side of the block that tells more.

I agree, a later roller cam 1 piece rear main seal block is much more desirable these days to build a motor from.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 07:06 PM
  #6  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Yeah if it's worth something, SELL IT.

Casting date would have to end in 8 or 9 for that. And the stamping code would have to end in DZ.

If it's like the other 99.99999% of 010 blocks, sell it anyway; let it pass on to The Greater Fool; and buy something decent.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 10:06 PM
  #7  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 806
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

If the 302 would have been so great they would have stayed with it... but they didnt. They made hundreds of thousands 350s for a reason.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2020 | 11:58 PM
  #8  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

They did not make the 302 because it was "better than" the 350, which came out the same year (67) in the same car line, as the Camaro SS. (not the SS396 which obviously was something different) They made the 302 because SCCA had a 5.0 liter limit at that time on the Trans Am series (which Pontiac DID NOT run at the time, they just BOUGHT the use of the name) and GM had to produce 500 copies of it MINIMUM ("homologues") and make them available for sale at dealers. In 67, the 302 was small-journal, and they just did what hot-rodders had been doing for several years by then: take a 327 block and put a 283 crank in it. Some 283s, you could bore to 4", even; before the 327 was introduced. Which is where it got started, it was called a "301" back then. It wasn't because the 302 was "good" in the sense of, it was The Best, and there was No Better Option; rather, it was because it was AS FAR AS THEY COULD GO and still participate in that particular class.

We all knew within a few months of its introduction, that you could walk into the stealership and order RPO "Z28" and you would get basically a race car. That was the first RPO code I know of that made it out of the factory and into the general public's lingo; long before ZL1, L anything, Z71, etc. Solid cam, Holley carb, 4-speed, 3.73 gears. You couldn't even get A RADIO in a car with that RPO. I think the ONLY creature-comfort option available was a heater. They were SO OVERWHELMED by the demand that in 69 they expanded what you could get because people wanted to order THAT plus AC, FM radio, vinyl top, disappearing headlights (the RS package), carpet instead of a rubber mat, etc. etc. etc. Automatic transmission came still later. Oh yeah, those were the daze.

The SCCA eventually changed their rules and after that even Pontiac could participate.

Last edited by sofakingdom; Aug 10, 2020 at 05:41 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2020 | 06:43 AM
  #9  
ironwill's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 565
Car: 1986 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Originally Posted by Cman12345
Hey everyone, I just found a 4 bolt main core for a decent price. I just looked up the casting numbers and it's apparently a 302 block from a 60s camaro (3970010) from my understanding the only difference between the two engines was the crank and stroke.. so that being said, if I got the 302 block and put a 350 crank with a 3.48" stroke it would be a 350, right? Tia! Wanting to do a 350 build and I think this block is a good start to a budget build.
You'd do well to pass on that ancient block and instead, start with something newer---one provisioned for a roller cam and with a 1-piece rear main seal.

But as these-type threads almost always go on this site, you're gonna disregard this advice and use that old block anyway. So be certain that the first thing the machine shop does after it comes out of the hot tank is check it for cracks and for core shift before you have any machine work done on it.

GL with your build.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2020 | 07:51 AM
  #10  
CKone's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 458
Likes: 171
From: East Moline, IL
Car: 88 T/A, 91 Formula, 94 Firehawk
Engine: 400 Pontiac, 5.0 TPI, 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 700R4, T5, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10, 3.42, 3.42
Re: Chevy 302 bock to 350?

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
They did not make the 302 because it was "better than" the 350, which came out the same year (67) in the same car line, as the Camaro SS. (not the SS396 which obviously was something different) They made the 302 because SCCA had a 5.0 liter limit at that time on the Trans Am series (which Pontiac DID NOT run at the time, they just BOUGHT the use of the name) and GM had to produce 500 copies of it MINIMUM ("homologues") and make them available for sale at dealers. It wasn't because the 302 was "good" in the sense of, it was The Best, and there was no better option; rather, it was because it was AS FAR AS THEY COULD GO and still participate in that particular class.

We all knew within a few months of its introduction, that you could walk into the stealership and order RPO "Z28" and you would get basically a race car. Solid cam, Holley carb, 4-speed, 3.73 gears. You couldn't even get A RADIO in a car with that RPO. I think the ONLY creature-comfort option available was a heater. They were SO OVERWHELMED by the demand that in 69 they expanded what you could get because people wanted to order THAT plus AC, FM radio, vinyl top, disappearing headlights (the RS package), carpet instead of a rubber mat, etc. etc. etc. Automatic transmission came still later. Oh yeah, those were the daze.

The SCCA eventually changed their rules and after that even Pontiac could participate.
If my reading memory serves me correctly Pontiac also had to pay SCCA $5 for each car it sold using the Trans Am name. That was probably a lot back then lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Squeeks83
Tech / General Engine
47
Feb 25, 2024 09:12 PM
pandorafowler
Engine Swap
12
Nov 7, 2021 06:49 PM
bes217
Tech / General Engine
1
Dec 6, 2003 08:00 PM
pauldaniel26
Tech / General Engine
35
Sep 23, 2002 01:50 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.