Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

anyone here runing hooker cat-back and headers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #1  
MattW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
anyone here runing hooker cat-back and headers?

mine is using stock manifolds for now and it doesnt seem to b extremely loud...my friends 94Z has flowmaster cat-back and it is extremely loud inside and outside of the car...at 2500 or so it seems to just rumble throughout the car.....and i like that....so i was wondering that when i put headers on my car will it make my exhaust a lot louder?

or will i have to switch over to flowmaster 40 series for that type of sound?...cuz i like the hooker setup but i just want it to b loud like his


any advice would b great
thanks
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #2  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Headers will make your car louder. My Hooker cay back was pretty tame with my stock manifolds. Even with the crappy flowtechs that I have the sound drastically changed and got noticably louder. This is with a cat to. You will be very happy with the sound with that set-up. The stock thick manifolds dampen the sound very well. Thin wall headers do not
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #3  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
I still have the manifolds for a little while, and it is quite as hell at idle. At WOT though it is still pretty loud, but not as loud as I want it. I had a buddy w/ a LS1 that had manifolds and the hooker catback. Was pretty tame until he added the headers he got, and WOW that car screams now!!!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #4  
MattW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
good deal...yah i mean i like how it roars when u get on it but i just want all around louder sound...so it looks like the headers will do it for me
thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #5  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Headers will make your car louder. My Hooker cay back was pretty tame with my stock manifolds. Even with the crappy flowtechs that I have the sound drastically changed and got noticably louder. This is with a cat to. You will be very happy with the sound with that set-up. The stock thick manifolds dampen the sound very well. Thin wall headers do not

the thickness of the material has nothign to do with it.

in the manifolds, the air (and sound) smack into this wall a inch and a half from the port, and do a 90* bend to meet all the other cyls and then go thru a small exit. the slamming and 90* turns have the same effect as baffled mufflers.. it takes energy (and therefore sound volume) from the exhaust..

meanwhile headers are much more efficent and the sound can "flow" with the air thru the exhaust alot easier.

if you were to cast some manifolds in a header like shape (like some newer cars have) then you would have the same sound.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:22 PM
  #6  
MattW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
so also along the lines of louder exhaust u are saying that it will not create as much heat since there isnt as much energy created by all of the friction and whatnot from that initial 90* turn in the manifold?

which wil in turn allow my engine to run cooler...right?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by MattW
so also along the lines of louder exhaust u are saying that it will not create as much heat since there isnt as much energy created by all of the friction and whatnot from that initial 90* turn in the manifold?

which wil in turn allow my engine to run cooler...right?
blow on your arm.. do you feel a massive amount of heat from the friction from the moving air?

no, the friction has nothing to do with it.

matter of fact, the underhood temps will be higher because the headers will radiate more heat.


but, more of the exhaust heat will go out too... really from what ive seen, it doesnt have too much of a effect on engine temp...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #8  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by MrDude_1
the thickness of the material has nothign to do with it.

in the manifolds, the air (and sound) smack into this wall a inch and a half from the port, and do a 90* bend to meet all the other cyls and then go thru a small exit. the slamming and 90* turns have the same effect as baffled mufflers.. it takes energy (and therefore sound volume) from the exhaust..

meanwhile headers are much more efficent and the sound can "flow" with the air thru the exhaust alot easier.

if you were to cast some manifolds in a header like shape (like some newer cars have) then you would have the same sound.
It is wall thickenss that helps dampen the sound. Trust me. The wall thickenss will dissapate vibrations more effectively. For pipe sizes that small the amount of fluid head loss that you will see will not change the turbitity and create noise. Thermal energy does not create noise. There is also less potential energy in the flow in manifolds as opposed to headers so the vibrations are different. For the same reason why you can't hear your neighbors though a concrete wall but you can through drywall.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #9  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by MrDude_1
blow on your arm.. do you feel a massive amount of heat from the friction from the moving air?

no, the friction has nothing to do with it.

matter of fact, the underhood temps will be higher because the headers will radiate more heat.


but, more of the exhaust heat will go out too... really from what ive seen, it doesnt have too much of a effect on engine temp...
The friction has a lot to do with it. When the exhaust gasses leave the cylinder they are almost at super sonic speeds. At super sonic speeds air friction is HUGE. Some aircraft skins will swell up to an .5" at mach one. You are 100% correct about radiating more heat though. The stock manifolds act as heat sinks and do not dissapate it as easy as headers do.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 04:30 PM
  #10  
GASGZLR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 5.7 G92
Engine: L98 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi G80
I have hooker 2055 no cat and the cat back and it rubles at idle just enough to tell there is cam in my motor, then at WOT it is crazy loud! Like old school chambered exhaust loud. The biggest restriction on sound I have found is the cat, once gone your motor will sound like a true muscle car.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #11  
pre's Avatar
pre
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: THM700R4
I put on a hooker cat-backwith the stock manifolds and cat on and it was a little louder, but mostly had a better sound.

Once I put the Edelbrock TES and high flow cat on WOT is just plain nasty
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #12  
86WS6_T/A's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Hutto, TX
Car: 2003 Mach 1
Same here, I've got the hooker 2460's, high flow cat, and flowmaster 80 series and it's kinda loud at idle and screams at WOT. Sounds totally diff. inside and outside the car too.

Last week, I had my uncle take my car around the block and make a WOT pass to test something and it sounded like a damn pro stock car about 1/2 a mile off

I dunno why but my favorite sound is my CAI whistling from all the air rushing into it at WOT.:lala: :lala:
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #13  
MattW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Vortec 355
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: GM Axles and GM 3.73
yah i gutted my cat cuz it was clogged and i gained a few things...some good some bad.....one, my exhaust DID get louder, secondly my car gained an incredible amount of power, and third.....now EVERYONE can see how old my motor is....after i gutted the cat i noticed about 3 times the smoke as b4

i cant wait for my vortec 350
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redformula88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Oct 14, 2015 06:08 PM
thekurlyone
Tech / General Engine
1
Sep 30, 2015 12:54 PM
Chevykid810
Firebirds for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:57 PM
ssgt usaf
TPI
1
Sep 21, 2015 12:45 PM
hdis2002
Exhaust
2
Sep 8, 2015 02:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.