Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Hooker or headman lt's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Hooker or headman lt's?

i currently have hooker 2210 lt's on my z, w/ a zz4 hsr &t56. i have a chance to pick up some headman lt's for 100 bucks. they are the 1 5/8, so they have smaller primaries than the hookers at 1 3/4. they are both non coated, but i'd really like extra clearance w/ the headmans, so i can lower the car 1.5". what kind of performance loss will i see by switching from the hookers to the headmans? i have a 2.5" y, w/ 2 high flow cats, to a 3" single exhaust after the headers btw, but i want duals in the future....
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #2  
89formula350b2l's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, NC
Car: 92 Camaro
Engine: Dart SHP 406 HSR, LE heads
Transmission: Performabuilt Level 2, Vig 3200
Axle/Gears: S60 373
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

I say keep the Hooker LT's. IMO it would be a real PITA to redo your whole exhaust. I would kill to get ahold of the Hooker 1 3/4 LT's.
On the other hand, I dont imagine it would be much of a performance difference going from 1 3/4 LT to 1 5/8 LT. I think I actually saw a dyno test somewhere on a 500 flywheel horsepower engine and he switched from hedman 1 5/8 LT to the hooker 1 3/4 and lost 10 horsepower and 20 ftlbs of torque. ill search the web again for the article.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
MrBrooks's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Bham AL
Car: '92 RS
Engine: 357ci
Transmission: G-Force t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10bolt mini spool
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

You will most likely see a small GAIN on the bottom end from the smaller primary. However the setup you have now will have to be modified to get that y-pipe to work, so you may as well do the duels now.
Headers are not the low point in the system anyway-----either of those will be good for a 1.5" drop----the low point is gonna be at the trans x-member.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #4  
L69HAWK's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: s.n.j.
Car: 1984 T/A WS6
Engine: L69 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: fact G80 with GT4 3.73
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

i agree with Mrbrooks. u will get a small torq gain.

i am in the process of doing duals on my 84 t/a. i chose the hedmans. i just thought that 1 3/4 was to big even after i do the motor swap. not mention clearences in the motor compartment.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #5  
84 z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 21
From: Rochester NY
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

stay away from 1 3/4 header unless your going to do a lot of track time or your going to be making serius hp. 1 5/8 headers are good for any street car. i have headman lt 68468 and I have no complaints.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #6  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

Originally Posted by MrBrooks
You will most likely see a small GAIN on the bottom end from the smaller primary. However the setup you have now will have to be modified to get that y-pipe to work, so you may as well do the duels now.
Headers are not the low point in the system anyway-----either of those will be good for a 1.5" drop----the low point is gonna be at the trans x-member.
the hookers on there now are NOT got for a drop at all, 3.5 inches of clearance as they are now, and they are just as low as the x-member and exhaust by the x-member.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 03:50 AM
  #7  
MrBrooks's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Bham AL
Car: '92 RS
Engine: 357ci
Transmission: G-Force t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10bolt mini spool
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

They should'nt hang any lower than you're subframe. The pipe will have to dive under the x-member to clear. That is usually the low point in a long tube system.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #8  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

http://s272.photobucket.com/albums/j...186548/Camaro/ there is a pic of the exhaust, maybe im missing something. the collecters are only 3.5 inches of the ground, so w/ sportlines they'd be 2 inchs right? thats scary low to daylie drive. how woud i run duals w/ my set up? i was thinking oval pipe fo rclearance, and going around the x-member, but more linearly than what i have now, the guy b4 me kinda did a hack job on the y pipe....
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
carscomefirst's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: mo
Car: 04 gtp, 96 f150, 88 camaro
Engine: 3.8sc, 5.0, 385ci
Transmission: auto, 5speed, 700r4
Re: Hooker or headman lt's?

Not having headers myself, I dont know which ones would be be better for your application. however, I might be interested in buying the ones you dont use. PM me if interested. thanks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 9, 2016 09:22 PM
thekurlyone
Tech / General Engine
1
Sep 30, 2015 12:54 PM
Chevykid810
Firebirds for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:57 PM
ssgt usaf
TPI
1
Sep 21, 2015 12:45 PM
Tylermcclinton
Engine Swap
0
Sep 17, 2015 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.