Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
insomniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 833
Likes: 17
From: The Jersey Shore
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
MagnaFlow vs Hooker

See alot of threads of but most seem to be 1 brand against flowmaster...

I am buying a catback at anytime now for my project...

I already have Hooker 2055 Headers and Y pipe, and probably just gonna get a walker 3" cat.

When I woke up this morning I thought I was going to buy a flowmaster cat back. But the more I read and more I thought about it I am moving away from the flowmaster because alothough I want the car to be loud and sound good. My car is a vert and i dont want it to be totally overbearing to where I cant hold a conversation with someone.

So iv narrowed it down to either the magnaflow or the hooker.

Anyone know the pros and cons of the 2? Iv listened to them on youtube but its hard to tell...

Also how will my crane 2032 cam effect on sound of the exhaust?

Last edited by insomniac; Dec 26, 2011 at 07:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 10:35 PM
  #2  
alvanwie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Dyer, In
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

No comparison, Magnaflow for sure. I have used both. While the Hooker sounds good it will not hold up as well as the Magnaflow. With our winters the Hooker did not even last 2 years before the outside of every major bend rusted throught and the input to the muffler rusted through. You will not have that problem with the Magnaflow being stainless. The Magnaflow is relatively quiet for cruising but will let you know its there at WOT.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #3  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Originally Posted by insomniac
See alot of threads of but most seem to be 1 brand against flowmaster...

I am buying a catback at anytime now for my project...

I already have Hooker 2055 Headers and Y pipe, and probably just gonna get a walker 3" cat.

When I woke up this morning I thought I was going to buy a flowmaster cat back. But the more I read and more I thought about it I am moving away from the flowmaster because alothough I want the car to be loud and sound good. My car is a vert and i dont want it to be totally overbearing to where I cant hold a conversation with someone.

So iv narrowed it down to either the magnaflow or the hooker.

Anyone know the pros and cons of the 2? Iv listened to them on youtube but its hard to tell...

Also how will my crane 2032 cam effect on sound of the exhaust?
Having heard Hooker vs Magnaflow on an LT1 I prefer the Hooker exhaust. Sounds so much better to me. But then again, its all up to your ears.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 11:10 PM
  #4  
Carlos773's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 97 LT1 W/ Alot of goodies.
Transmission: 4L60E W/ Yank SS3600
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt BW
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Hooker owner here and it sounds better than I thought, I like the Magnaflow too as well. Its all your preference to be honest.

Also for those saying about Hookers not lasting, take some advice. You can prevent it from rusting out. Even then replacements are not that expensive.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 06:49 AM
  #5  
insomniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 833
Likes: 17
From: The Jersey Shore
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

here is the thing im torn with: why build a race car if you dont want it to sound like one?

that would be my argument for flowmaster but at the same time I see how that could get annoying.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 07:34 AM
  #6  
Anti-Venom's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 373
Likes: 58
From: Springfield, IL
Car: '89 Formula WS6
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4/T56
Axle/Gears: BW 3.23
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

It's not that Flowmaster is loud. I don't mind loud. It's the drone and cackle that gets old. My Magnaflow is just as loud at WOT as the Flowmaster. But it sounds deeper at idle, doesn't drone under cruising, doesn't cackle under decel, and is known to be a better flowing system. I can also tell you the piping being stainless weighs less and will last much longer. I have owned both and speak from direct experience with the two systems. I am much happier with the Magnaflow systems all around. They even have better adjustment and fit. You can set the tips height where the Blowmasters where welded to the can and hung to low. Tangibly all around better quality.

The hooker system is more of a system designed with max flow in mind and designed to meet track db requirements and that's about it. It's a much louder system than the Magnaflow. They sound bad *** behind a cam'd car imo but they don't last.

Last edited by Anti-Venom; Dec 27, 2011 at 07:44 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 02:34 PM
  #7  
macneilbibi's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 127
Likes: 17
From: WI
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9 bolt 3.45 gear
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

magnaflow for sure...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BccNV...nvOrjdZfHzvtXV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWpyr...nvOrjdZfHzvtXV
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 02:48 PM
  #8  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Originally Posted by Anti-Venom
It's not that Flowmaster is loud. I don't mind loud. It's the drone and cackle that gets old. My Magnaflow is just as loud at WOT as the Flowmaster. But it sounds deeper at idle, doesn't drone under cruising, doesn't cackle under decel, and is known to be a better flowing system. I can also tell you the piping being stainless weighs less and will last much longer. I have owned both and speak from direct experience with the two systems. I am much happier with the Magnaflow systems all around. They even have better adjustment and fit. You can set the tips height where the Blowmasters where welded to the can and hung to low. Tangibly all around better quality.

The hooker system is more of a system designed with max flow in mind and designed to meet track db requirements and that's about it. It's a much louder system than the Magnaflow. They sound bad *** behind a cam'd car imo but they don't last.
The Hooker Aerochamber exhaust isn't louder at all, not by a human ear.

The Hooker Max Flow yes.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #9  
meangreen92's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: sebring, fl
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

hooker if your not in a rust state, although you can prevent it, magnaflow is quality hands down.. ive had both, but ive ran hooker aero chambers on my L98, LT1, and LS1 car(wasnt raspy like most LS cars).. flowmaster is nice, but long drive times, the drone sucks..
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:49 PM
  #10  
insomniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 833
Likes: 17
From: The Jersey Shore
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

well i guess im officially team magnaflow, just came in today
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:11 PM
  #11  
Screamin86's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
From: Verona Va
Car: 86 Trans Am,03 Yukon,92 Z28
Engine: 5.3, 5.3, lb9
Transmission: th350,4l60e,700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73,3.73,2.73
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

congrats! i have it on my 92z and can post up some video clips of how mine sounds running it hard during a autox event with the magnaflow catback and 3in cat and a flowmaster setup with no cat if interested. the flowmaster imo got on my nerves i didnt mind the idle sound but was raspy and had a tinny sound.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 06:48 AM
  #12  
insomniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 833
Likes: 17
From: The Jersey Shore
Car: 1991 Firebird Convertible
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt Posi
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

that would be great
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 05:23 PM
  #13  
unseenT/A's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Queens,NYC
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: Patriot Performance 383 500hp
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 4.09's
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqMtttqsyQk

Magnaflow 3inch stainless catback,wouldn't catch myself with any other brand.

although my car isn't stock it sounds amazing.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 06:38 PM
  #14  
Confuzed1's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

I've had a Hooker catback on my car for 6 years so far, and I've heard them all. I'll stick with Hooker!!
Quiet while cruising, and raises h*ll when you tromp on it!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 08:14 PM
  #15  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

I've had the same pair of Hookers on 3 different vehicles, currently on my '03 Avalanche. They are around 6 or 7 years old and have been through 6 rough Iowa winters and still are rust free (except for surface rust on the welds). My truck sees it all too, i'm not easy on it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #16  
92droptopws6's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 914
Likes: 29
From: Las Vegas
Car: '88 Trans Am
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: Slushbox
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Magnaflow all the way....
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 09:17 PM
  #17  
SDTransAM's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Car: '83 z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Stock?
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

I just installed my Hooker headers, hooker y pipe. Cat-delete pipe, and magnaflow cat-back. I started the car with it all hooked up besides the muffler, it was very loud. Put the magnaflow muffler on and am suprised how much that quieted the car down. It sounds great though. Can't wait to drive it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 09:21 PM
  #18  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

Originally Posted by SDTransAM
I just installed my Hooker headers, hooker y pipe. Cat-delete pipe, and magnaflow cat-back. I started the car with it all hooked up besides the muffler, it was very loud. Put the magnaflow muffler on and am suprised how much that quieted the car down. It sounds great though. Can't wait to drive it.
The sign of a good muffler is a significant reduction in noise without reducing flow.

Hooker and Magnaflow are BOTH good at that. From there on its your preference for how you want your noise shaped. For me the Magnaflow is just too flat. As the rev's clime the pitch doesn't climb it remains a steady blat.

I'll eventually be replacing my SLP 2otL muffler for a hooker aerochamber 1 in 2 out non-crossflow muffler so I can retain my 2otL looks but get the Aerochamber sound.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 09:37 PM
  #19  
SDTransAM's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Car: '83 z/28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Stock?
Re: MagnaFlow vs Hooker

I revved the car in the garage a little bit, and it had a pretty nice tone to it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 9, 2016 09:22 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.