Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Pace Setter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 04:59 PM
  #1  
stevver84Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore,Md USA
Car: 1990 Iroc Hardtop
Pace Setter

Does anyone have any comments about pacesetter cat back systems. i have one on my 84 Z28 and i need to get a new one just because this one is all hacked up and wont fit my car correct.... it has a 3" intermitent pipe and it sounds ok i guess but i wondering if it is worth buying again or if i should go for the hookers because i have heard that they are decent.... the rest of my system involves Edelbrock headers and a dynomax high flow cat.....need suggestions!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2001 | 04:54 AM
  #2  
RS91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Guam
I actually asked this question before ...Few months ago a guy brag about his pacesetter cat-back....
he was very satisfied with it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2001 | 03:23 PM
  #3  
L98IROCZ89's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Central, NJ
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Vortech Supercharged ZZ4 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I am one of the few with the Monza Pace-Setter Cat-Back.

If you are looking for a VERY quiet performance catback... this is the one for you. There is absoltley zero interior resonance, even with my headers. It is fairly quiet outside of the car as well, but does sound very good. Unfortunatly, I have no basis of comparison as far as performance goes.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2002 | 04:46 AM
  #4  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
I have heard nothing but bad about pace setter


granted most of it comes from the rx-7 world but from what I have heard is there are problems with the stuff fitting, rusting, sound quality being real raspy and/or tinny, or just plain falling apart, I have heard of them warping and stuff like that


all in all with what I have heard with there rotary line I would never use one on any other car I ever own.

but if you are looking for a cheap cat-back then this would be the one for you
and again though dont know how they do in the boinger world
but if you find good results with it let me know please
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2002 | 02:17 PM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I wouldn't recommend it. The muffler inlet is 2-1/2" swaged out to fit the 3" intermediate pipe - silly, and restrictive. Otherwise, the I-pipe and tail pipes are fine.

I put a Flowmaster in place of the Pacesetter muffler that came with the set. Should have just gone with the Flowmaster cat-back.

As for Pacesetter in general, I put a pair of their 2-1/4" turbo mufflers on the '57 when I put a 350 in it 11 years ago. I cut them out of the system last year when I put on the current exhaust. Even with the 396, I would only gain a tenth when uncorking the headers. I gave them to a fellow racer with a '68 Camaro 327 4-speed - he immediately picked up 2 tenths over the Cherry Bomb header glass packs he'd had on forever. After having the engine rebuilt last summer, he's a full second faster than he ever was with the 'Bombs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
indygene
Camaros for Sale
0
Sep 26, 2015 11:21 AM
scottmoyer
Camaros for Sale
3
Sep 7, 2015 07:06 PM
masonta
TPI
13
Aug 31, 2015 10:14 PM
86iroctpi
Tech / General Engine
5
Dec 6, 2001 12:09 AM
zupmanZ28
Exhaust
7
Feb 17, 2001 04:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.