Long tubes and clutch slave/clutch fork
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 412
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Long tubes and clutch slave/clutch fork
Anyone have any experience with longtubes and a hydraulic slave cylinder interfering? I know every bell is slightly different, every set of headers is slightly different, and each thirdgen is slightly different. -but in general......is this a no go? is it close? Just curious what you guys have found.
Found some info. Seems hit or miss. Talked to American Powertrain about a hydraulic throwout conversion.
Found some info. Seems hit or miss. Talked to American Powertrain about a hydraulic throwout conversion.
Last edited by Abubaca; May 31, 2019 at 02:17 PM.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: Long tubes and clutch slave/clutch fork
Hedman has a 1-5/8 set that fits
Or make it fit
Or make it fit
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: Long tubes and clutch slave/clutch fork
I had the Hooker long tubes with a T-5 and T-56 and it was fine. I now have the knock off Stainless works headers with a T56 and it's really close to the bell housing's mount for the slave cylinder but I've experienced no problems.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
camarochris89
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
Mar 23, 2016 10:29 PM
convert46
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
Oct 31, 2013 12:58 AM
The Happy Viper
Transmissions and Drivetrain
7
Mar 28, 2006 02:50 PM
f-crazy
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
Nov 14, 2004 05:34 PM