Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
I brought this up before on the transmission board but got no real solid opinions.
So umm.. I bought an SFI flywheel, and ignored the "must be used with our race disc". What happens is, the flange is thicker on the SFI flywheel, yet the total flywheel thickness is the same as OEM so the springs on a OE type (dual friction in this case) disc hit the bolts.
So, late at night, without really any other option I stuck the flywheel in the lathe and I turned down the mounting flange. I reduced it's size/thickness from .346" to .226"..
Then I cleaned up the tops of the bolt heads, so the combo clears. Put it together and tried it up and down the driveway.
It came back apart, and now it's sitting on my work bench.
Do you think .226" is enough thickness for the mounting hub on a manual trans flywheel, or would you throw it out ?
I did this like 2 years ago, and it's been sitting since. I'd hate to throw it out and waste $200, but at the same time I wonder if it's gonna crack/explode..
-- Joe
So umm.. I bought an SFI flywheel, and ignored the "must be used with our race disc". What happens is, the flange is thicker on the SFI flywheel, yet the total flywheel thickness is the same as OEM so the springs on a OE type (dual friction in this case) disc hit the bolts.
So, late at night, without really any other option I stuck the flywheel in the lathe and I turned down the mounting flange. I reduced it's size/thickness from .346" to .226"..
Then I cleaned up the tops of the bolt heads, so the combo clears. Put it together and tried it up and down the driveway.
It came back apart, and now it's sitting on my work bench.
Do you think .226" is enough thickness for the mounting hub on a manual trans flywheel, or would you throw it out ?
I did this like 2 years ago, and it's been sitting since. I'd hate to throw it out and waste $200, but at the same time I wonder if it's gonna crack/explode..
-- Joe
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
It should be fine, but noone can really tell you for sure without seeing it. In reality if you want to be safe just spend the money on the correct parts
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
Or I could get an OE type flywheel and keep the new disc I have...
I just hate throwing out parts I paid money for

-- Joe
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
I decided to just buy a new RAM 1501 sfi flywheel and a 6 puck ceramic clutch with the 8 small springs.
Guess I'll hang this other flywheel up on the wall.
-- Joe
Guess I'll hang this other flywheel up on the wall.
-- Joe
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,959
Likes: 2,469
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
Yup, risk vs reward.
General method for evaluating the value of risk:
1. Estimate the likelihood of a failure happening; mulitply that, times the severity of the failure outcome (loss of feet).
2. Determine the cost of a risk-free replacement.
Whichever cost is lower, is what you should go with.
I don't know about you, but I'm REALLY FOND of my feet... meaning the cost of #1 is REAL HIGH... so #2 would have to be pretty high for it to exceed #1.
General method for evaluating the value of risk:
1. Estimate the likelihood of a failure happening; mulitply that, times the severity of the failure outcome (loss of feet).
2. Determine the cost of a risk-free replacement.
Whichever cost is lower, is what you should go with.
I don't know about you, but I'm REALLY FOND of my feet... meaning the cost of #1 is REAL HIGH... so #2 would have to be pretty high for it to exceed #1.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Modified flywheel, machined hub with lathe
Yup, risk vs reward.
General method for evaluating the value of risk:
1. Estimate the likelihood of a failure happening; mulitply that, times the severity of the failure outcome (loss of feet).
2. Determine the cost of a risk-free replacement.
Whichever cost is lower, is what you should go with.
I don't know about you, but I'm REALLY FOND of my feet... meaning the cost of #1 is REAL HIGH... so #2 would have to be pretty high for it to exceed #1.
General method for evaluating the value of risk:
1. Estimate the likelihood of a failure happening; mulitply that, times the severity of the failure outcome (loss of feet).
2. Determine the cost of a risk-free replacement.
Whichever cost is lower, is what you should go with.
I don't know about you, but I'm REALLY FOND of my feet... meaning the cost of #1 is REAL HIGH... so #2 would have to be pretty high for it to exceed #1.


Got bit by the 2210s not clearing a stock type 400 (staggered ) starter this weekend. Hopefully the new delco "mini" staggered starter will clear. Should have drilled the block out for the straight pattern before I assembled it. Oh well.
-- Joe
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
monte87cortez
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:10 PM









