History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

which motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 12:36 PM
  #1  
Diabolical's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 85 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 305HO L69
Transmission: T5
which motor

I was looking at the Camaro Technical Database, and I had a question. For the LB9 engine, for each year it lists more than one LB9 with different horsepower numbers with one having up to 35 more horsepower than the other in the same year. How accurate is that site's information? Did they put more than one version of the same engine in the same year? If that is the case, they still have the same engine code and vin code right? How would you tell a 195hp LB9 from a 220hp LB9 from the same year?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
zedder 1 9 9 0's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Bowmanville,Ontario Canada
Car: 1990 Iroc Z Convertible
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
It all depends on the transmission. The automatics got fewer ponies than the 5 speeds. I believe that from 1986 to 1989 the 305 autos were saddled with the peanut cam, the 5 speed cars got the same cam as the 350. In 1990 all TPI mototrs started to use the same cam. Another difference has been the exhaust system used on the cars, some of the cars had dual cats which added 20 hp.SO from 86- 89 if you ordered a 5 speed wit hdual cats you had alot more hp than someone who ordered an auto. I believe this is how it was, if I'm wrong on some of my facts I'm sure someone will correct any erroneous info that I've given.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #3  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
yeah also changes in mass air flow sensors to speed density.. gained a few hp also.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 04:02 PM
  #4  
08141980's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: California
Agree
that's the frustrating thing about the LB9 option. The potential is there...but if you have to settle with 190hp just because you have auto..it is the dumps. Yet the autos (peanut cam) got more torque...so it's out of the whole quicker than the 1985 auto with is the only year the LB9 came with the "corvette cam"...good for 215 hp...but 275lbs of torque as opposed to 295-300 lbs.

My understaning is that the 92 Z-28 with TPI 305 (MAP) had 2 options for that year. The 205 hp and the 230hp. The 230 hp could only be had in auto form if you ordered the "performance" axle---3:42 ratio...I might be wrong on the ratio.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hydrolic144
Interior Parts for Sale
2
Sep 8, 2015 06:55 PM
masonta
Power Adders
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:40 PM
greenyone
Electronics
0
Aug 29, 2015 11:08 AM
Randomtask2
Electronics
1
Aug 26, 2015 03:34 PM
slade5612
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 11, 2015 07:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.