History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Why no 350's with manual in 3rd gens?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #1  
Chuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Why no 350's with manual in 3rd gens?

Anyone know why 350's were available with
automatics only on 3rd gens?
Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
MDv6man's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
I think it was for two reasons

1. the 350 had a greater tendency to eat the T-5 trans for lunch

2. That combo would have made the Camaro perform equal to the Vette. To that GM says :nono:
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
89' RS/blue's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 1989 RS Camaro
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
The reason they didn't make a 350 camaro with the T-5 is because the 350 has way too much torque for it to handle. It would eat the tranny. Although they did make the 305 TPI with a T-5 thats an excellent alternative.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #4  
FruityOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
But it woudn't really have increased the cost that much if they put a manual with the 350. They had transmissions that could do it. I agree with MDv6man on this though. I think the decision was based more on politics than anything else. Can't have the F-body beating the vette at anything now can we?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 01:20 PM
  #5  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Yeah there was the ZF six speed sitting around in the late 80's that they could have used. But they opted not too because the Vette had it and that was part of the allure of buying the Vette. To get the top of the line tranny and engine.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #6  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
The ZF6 would have added enough to the price tag to discourage as many sales as it would encourage. By the late 80's the thirdgen was already experiancing a weak market and the availability of the stick with a higher price tag wouldn't have helped.

The T56 is/was a much cheaper transmission to produce and install, and required less modification to make it work. Had it been around in 87, it probably would have been available with the L98.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2003 | 05:28 PM
  #7  
92GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 15
From: CA
Exactly what Drew said...

The ZF-6 would have been ATLEAST a $6K option!!! The tranny alone ran $6K back in the late 80's early 90's, granted that's retail. Also on top of that you have all the extra fabrication needed for an F-Body PLUS they have to mark it up a little. So all in all it really would have been more than a $5K option and for what? An engine with 5 more HP and a little more TQ than the 305/5-spd? It just doesn't make sense...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
camaro11j
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 19, 2018 08:49 AM
Out-Cast
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 17, 2015 10:57 AM
reiderz iroc
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 13, 2015 04:57 PM
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.