History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Lear Siegler seats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
buffaloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
From: Galion, Ohio
Car: 1989 Firebird Fornula 350
Engine: 350 L98 / NOS
Transmission: 4sp Auto
Lear Siegler seats

The 1983 Trans AM MSE#103 I just got has these seat in it. They adjust 6 ways. On the window sticker I see the cost 750.00 back then. Does any one else have these seat in there car? I also have recaro seats in a 1983 Dayton car and the Lear seat are better.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 07:09 PM
  #2  
tagta189's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
I have them in my 85 ta.They are geat seats,very,very comfortable and with all the adjustments you have on them they really hold you in the seat like you are glued in.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
have any pics?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #4  
85 T/A WS6's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 3
From: Washington
Car: Recaro Option T/A
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3:27 Borg Warner
Its a choice, comfort or performance, Ill take performance.

If I want comfort I will drive my couch around
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #5  
buffaloman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
From: Galion, Ohio
Car: 1989 Firebird Fornula 350
Engine: 350 L98 / NOS
Transmission: 4sp Auto
85/TA what do you mean? These seat hold you in the seat. They are performace seats. The sides can be adjusted to suck you right in.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #6  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
In my 85 IROC.

JamesC
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-drseat.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #7  
Dens71TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 24
From: Midwest
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Anybody ever notice that Camaros only got a driver's side Lear Siegler seat and Firebirds got them for driver and passenger?

I noticed that on my friends '82 Camaro pace car and I see James C's '85 IROC is the same way too.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
Greg99LS1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX USA
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
That's correct, they were never offered for the passenger seat in a Camaro.

My first new car, an '83 Z28 had that option.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #9  
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 3
From: Sonoma CO. CA.
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
These are in my 1984 Z28
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #10  
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 3
From: Sonoma CO. CA.
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Whoops, Here they are...
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-dscf0202.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
Kevin84Z28's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 3
From: Sonoma CO. CA.
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69 305 H.O.
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Here's what they look like out of the car...
Attached Thumbnails Lear Siegler seats-seat1.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 04:08 PM
  #12  
DanTheMan_smlk's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Greg99LS1
That's correct, they were never offered for the passenger seat in a Camaro.

My first new car, an '83 Z28 had that option.
what was it like back then? Did people like the "new" camaro more than the 2nd gen? Did people like fox bodies more?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #13  
Greg99LS1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX USA
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
It was cool.....the Camaro and Firebird were very popular, and NO ONE thought that a Camaro of any year was a white trash car in those days. (I blame the late 80's BMW 318i-driving yuppie scum)

If people liked them more than the 2nd Gens, it's mostly because the 2nd Gens had been around so long and that we finally had a new, high-tech Camaro (for that time).

I like to think that the 3rd Gen was the generation where the Camaro grew up.....it finally got fuel injection, overdrive transmissions, four wheel disk brakes, leather interiors, articulated driving seats, and world-class handling.

The only thing about the 82-83 Camaros was the lack of serious horspower, but NOTHING had a lot of HP in those days, even the Corvette or a Ferrari 308. The '83 L69 started the horsepower wars that continue intil this day....

Most of my friends had Camaros, specifically Z28s.....one of my brother's friends had a '83 Mustang GT. It ran good in a straight line, but the handling sucked compared to the Z28, it had rear drum brakes, and worst of all, family car-looking steering wheel, seats, and dashboard. The '87 interior redesign for the Mustang look worlds better....

The Z28 was a much better all-around car, but later on, Ford did a few great things that really appealed to the gearheads, namely the world-class T5 (sooner than the F-bodies), and the 8.8 rear axle. Now as used cars, it makes them easier to handle large amounts of power, but when they were all new cars, they were pretty even in acceleration, despite the present-day opinion.

The Mustang never did handle on the level of an IROC or WS6, though. Magazine tests will show that the F-bodies always badly smoked the Mustang on a road racing track. The Mustang seemed to be set up more for drag racing, as it held a .2 second advantage in ETs on the 305 F-cars, while usually giving up that much to the L98 cars.

Last edited by Greg99LS1; Aug 8, 2005 at 05:28 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #14  
91rsowner4life's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Car: 1997 S10
Engine: 4-Cyl 2.2 Liter
Transmission: Automatic
heres this link i found with some usefull info i think they still make the camaro camaro camaro covers https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=249642
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #15  
DanTheMan_smlk's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 1
hey, thanks for the info gregg, i was born in 86 so i dont remember anything from back then.... Ive always liked the camaro and fox body, especially the 90-93 convertibles....the gfx are awesome and i love the boxy styling
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #16  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 217
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
People in my high school envied those of us that drove newer Z28s. I had an 82 and an 83 during my junior and senior year while the 85 IROC-Z was new and only available to those whose daddy bought the car for them.

During my senior year, there were only 2 Z28s and 2 IROC-Zs and 2 Formulas in my entire school. Very popular cars that didn't carry any negative stigma like today. I agree that the very late 80s and early 90s gave us a bad rep.

For those that remember, would you agree that most people looked at the IROC-Z and as an affordable Corvette? Since we all seem to know what others think of owning a Vette, owning a Camaro was the next best thing!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #17  
Greg99LS1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX USA
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
I always got a huge kick out of the fact that Car & Driver named the '84 Z28 as the best handling American car, beating the Corvette Z51.....the cars were VERY close in performance at that time.

And it narrowly came in 2nd to the Porsche 944 as the best handling car in America, period.

These cars were HUGELY popular in the mid-80's, and we loved it!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrPackstin
Interior Parts for Sale
11
Oct 25, 2017 08:09 PM
GageBrand
Interior
3
Oct 22, 2015 02:30 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
Briandrex
Interior Parts for Sale
3
Oct 5, 2015 06:20 AM
dbrochard
Interior Parts Wanted
0
Sep 28, 2015 07:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.