History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

1990 IROC Confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
wesilva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
1990 IROC Confusion

I have a friend with a 1990 IROC fully optioned with t-tops and a 5.7/700R4 combo. From what I have read off the web, the t-tops were not an option for 5.7 IROCs or Firebirds in year 1990....yet his numbers match. Can anyone shed some light on what happened in this instance?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #2  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Have you checked the RPO codes for CC1? I had a friend who had t-tops, 350/AT in a 1990 Iroc, but I never checked the RPO codes to verify it was all GM. They were not the C&C T-tops as I have a Trans Am w/ the C&C T-tops so I know what they look like really well.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
MNformula350's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 17
For the 1,000,000 time, T-Tops were available on all 350 cars form 87-90 Camaro and Firebird
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #4  
Crusin' 1980's's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
Car: 1988 SC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700-R4
Hmmm, so you could get T-Tops with a 350, but you couldn't get a 86-92 convertable with a 350, right?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
cdartz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Crusin' 1980's
Hmmm, so you could get T-Tops with a 350, but you couldn't get a 86-92 convertable with a 350, right?
It is possible to have a convertible with a 350, depending on how the convertible conversion came about in the first place. ASC converted cars that were both designated as convertibles, and cars that weren't. If the car was designated a vert from GM the sixth digit in the VIN is "3", and these cars were not available with a 350. Cars originally designated as a coupe, VIN "2", could have a 350.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #6  
GREAT_WHITE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: east texas
Originally Posted by MNformula350
For the 1,000,000 time, T-Tops were available on all 350 cars form 87-90 Camaro and Firebird
almost true, unless you paid for the option the 350 (which i still believe it was only hard top cars ) it was only available in a hard top,,, t top and 5 speed cars were 305


kris
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #7  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by GREAT_WHITE
almost true, unless you paid for the option the 350 (which i still believe it was only hard top cars ) it was only available in a hard top,,, t top and 5 speed cars were 305


kris
Completely incorrect.

From 87-90 T-tops were available from the factory with a 350. I personally know 4 1989 L98 IROCs that ALL have T-tops. In 91/92 T-tops were only available with 305 or lower engine options.

In 91/92 there were aftermarket conversions however.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #8  
GREAT_WHITE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: east texas
not to be rude in any way,,, but ill have to go to the book for this one


kris
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #9  
Z03Z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 319
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
Car: 92Z28,98LegacyGT,ZX9R,91 Z28,02 Z71
Engine: 350,307,2.5,900cc,5.0
Transmission: 700r4,4spd auto,700r4,4L80
Axle/Gears: 323,?,323,?,373
From my understanding 90 was the first year no 5.7 and t-top rule started.But I have seen trans ams with both T-Tops and 350.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 02:10 AM
  #10  
Sleeper_Z's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Car: Golden yellow 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
My 87 IROC has t-tops and an L98. RPO:CC1, L98. On the other hand my 87 GTA and 88 GTA were both L98 cars but neither had t-tops. I think it was alittle more difficult to get t-tops and an L98 in a firebird for some reason.

Jeremy
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 04:45 AM
  #11  
irocnroll89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: previously OKINAWA JAPAN,georgia, now new england
Car: 1989 IROC--1989 T/A
Engine: 5.7 TPI in both
Transmission: W/C T-5 in both
Axle/Gears: B/W 3.27 in both
1989 IROC
B2L
CC1

Factory equipped
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #12  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,464
Likes: 219
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
To use the terms of another member:

"For the 1,000,000 time, T-Tops were NOT available on all 350 cars from 87-90 Camaro and Firebird. They were available, from the factory, on all 87-89 Camaros. I don't know the detail on the firebird. Check your friends RPO codes for CC1 and L98. He might actually have CC1 and LB9.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #13  
wesilva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear. 1990 through 1992 are the only years I'm concerned with. According to GM sources and internet sources, model year 1990 and newer Z28 and Trans Am's both could NOT be ordered with a 350 if you wanted T-tops....yet my buddies 1990 IROC with a numbers matching 350 has them. Now I know it's a 350 because we have rebuilt it. The sources claim, despite already having 350 in T-top cars in earlier models, the chassis was prone to flex. Could have been because the HP and torque went up in 1990.

Now I'm not familiar with the C&C T-tops. Is this an aftermarket company doing work for GM, similiar to say SRP? I will have him check for the CC1 RPO code. If it doesn't have this code, can I assume C&C did the work?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #14  
GREAT_WHITE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: east texas
ill get the results as soon as i can find my book, it shows options on every third gen made and exactly how many of each type ( t tops, motor, verts, hard tops, color combo's ect) havent seen it in a while ,,,however, when i find it ill do the research


kris
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #15  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
The only cars that could have t-tops and a 350 between 90 and 92 were the Formula.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #16  
kaptinkafeen's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Erin, Ont

There are always 'strange' exeptions though...
-Andrew
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
wesilva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Yeah....that's kind of what were thinking. I have seen other's who have posted combinations that were not generally available except for dealers. Maybe making this car more valuable.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #18  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
I would probably say that the car has the C&C tops in it. Does the tops have a trim piece infront of and behind where the glass would sit? And how wide is the section of roof behind the windshield?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #19  
1991L98G92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 355
Likes: 2
From: Central California Coast SM
Car: 91 Z28 24th Anniversary
Engine: L98
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Posi 3.23
Originally Posted by wesilva
I have a friend with a 1990 IROC fully optioned with t-tops and a 5.7/700R4 combo. From what I have read off the web, the t-tops were not an option for 5.7 IROCs or Firebirds in year 1990....yet his numbers match. Can anyone shed some light on what happened in this instance?
This pic is from the Camaro White Book page 120. As you can see all the 5.7 B2L's got the G92 option, and only available with IROC coupe.

CC1 not available with G92. Also note, not available with 5 speed manual trans. So the only 1990 IROC's out there with T-Tops from the "Factory" should only be Automatics with an LB9 (engine code 8th digit of VIN# F).

Last edited by 1991L98G92; Apr 29, 2006 at 02:16 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #20  
Slush92RS's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Valley Center,Kansas
Car: 92RS
Engine: LS 402 inwork
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt,3:73's
I was always told that 5 speed + 350 = NO T-TOPS.

I'm sure there might be some "freak" car out there that has it by mistake
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #21  
kaptinkafeen's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Erin, Ont
Originally Posted by 1991L98G92
This pic is from the Camaro White Book page 120. As you can see all the 5.7 B2L's got the G92 option, and only available with IROC coupe.

CC1 not available with G92. Also note, not available with 5 speed manual trans. So the only 1990 IROC's out there with T-Tops from the "Factory" should only be Automatics with an LB9 (engine code 8th digit of VIN# F).

Although the camaro white book is a good source, even the editor/author state that it may not be 100% accurate - I personally find that it does have many 'holes' and at time leaves the reader looking elsewhere for info - especially for the rare thirdgen cars like the TTA, B4C and 1LE's. For the first and second gen cars I find the info is much better especially since a lot more research has been performed over the 'extra' years the cars have been around. I can't comment though about its accuracy for the fourth gen cars.. Just my
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
Krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 1
From: Washington state
Car: 87 Irocz, 95 Z28, 71 Z28 /RS
Engine: 355 Tpi, LT1, 355
Transmission: Auto, Auto, 4sp
Originally Posted by Slush92RS
I was always told that 5 speed + 350 = NO T-TOPS.

I'm sure there might be some "freak" car out there that has it by mistake
NO its was 350 =No T5

But I thought it was 91 that started with the No t-tops in the 350.

My 87 Came factory with T-tops & 350
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #23  
wesilva's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Those of you who guessed C&C....congratulations! You are exactly correct. Very cool. Thanks for the very interesting reading and enlightenment.

Where can I learn more about C&C? Are they still around? Another interesting option on this car is a dealer installed cell phone. Very antiquated by todays standard. Huge receiver box in the drivers side rear stowage.

One more thing....my buddy is concerned that he might have ruined the value of this rare piece by installing subframe connectors. Opinions....?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 12:52 AM
  #24  
87TAairlineyard's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Whitehouse, Ohio
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 305 LB9 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700-R4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: Saginaw 10 bolt 2.73 posi
Ruined the value in the eyes of a collector perhaps, but increased it in the eyes of us enthusiasts!!!

Now he has the best of both worlds, the higher powered 350 along with the t-tops without the body flexing, creaking, and moaning that most of us with T-Tops and no SFCs have to live with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
Djmathis123
Auto Detailing and Appearance
11
Sep 29, 2015 01:36 AM
Djmathis123
Wheels and Tires
0
Aug 23, 2015 11:34 AM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.