History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Crash testing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #1  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: Central Connecticut
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Crash testing?

Hey guys, sorry if this is a blasphemous question, but were crash tests ever conducted on thirdgens? If so, how did they perform? It's just one of those small things I always wondered about. Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 10:51 PM
  #2  
RS Reaper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Stone Mtn., GA
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1 MFI
Transmission: 4 Speed Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Crash testing?

http://www.internetautoguide.com/cra...625/index.html
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 12:27 AM
  #3  
92RS(real slow)'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
From: Osceola Indiana
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Re: Crash testing?

I wonder if there are any crash test videos for our cars, because they seem to have them for every other car from late 80's to 90's
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 01:19 AM
  #4  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Crash testing?




It happens. The Camaro above was my first. Kid hit me while I was parked at a light. He was doing 35-40mph, don't think he even hit the brakes. Both myself and my passenger walked away. If you look closely you can see the roof is buckled across the B-pillars. The doors wouldn't close completely after the hit. The bird was a tow yard purchase, it obviously took a healthy hit.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 09:49 AM
  #5  
camaronewbie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 19
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Crash testing?

Uncle Sam might not of had to do any crash testing, as there were (and still are) plenty of 16 year olds out there doing the testing for them! :lmoa:
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #6  
FrankieRider2's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 854
Likes: 44
From: Batesville, AR 72501 USA
Car: '88 Bright Red GTA UPC 81U
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1
Re: Crash testing?

The only crash testing I have talked with anyone about first-hand involved the 1988 GTA Notchback option. I can't openly discuss specifics.... suffice it to say the option didn't pass on the first attempt.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: Central Connecticut
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

4 stars frontal crash? not bad for an 80s era sports car. Then again, with a nose that reaches the horizon, you'd expect it to do well. Some videos would be nice. And Drew, those pictures sting. lol Sucks about your camaro though, but you were OK and that's all that counts. What was that kid driving? Was he hurt?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #8  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Crash testing?

Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan
Drew, those pictures sting. lol Sucks about your camaro though, but you were OK and that's all that counts. What was that kid driving? Was he hurt?
1989 Pontiac Bonneville? He was ok, he had insurance so I didn't have to kill him.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #9  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

Originally Posted by musclecar70sfan
4 stars frontal crash? not bad for an 80s era sports car. Then again, with a nose that reaches the horizon, you'd expect it to do well. Some videos would be nice. And Drew, those pictures sting. lol Sucks about your camaro though, but you were OK and that's all that counts. What was that kid driving? Was he hurt?
yes, this is the main reason i was allowed to drive one in high school.
lots of energy absorbsion in both front and back ends.
however, they did very badly in side impacts because of the large doors and extremely poor seatbelts. im glad the 4th gen belts swap so easily into our cars because the 3rd gen seatbelts are very unsafe.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 06:40 PM
  #10  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: Central Connecticut
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

Originally Posted by stealtht/a
however, they did very badly in side impacts because of the large doors and extremely poor seatbelts. im glad the 4th gen belts swap so easily into our cars because the 3rd gen seatbelts are very unsafe.
Never heard about that before. How are the 4th gen seatbelts better? I always thought that a seatbelt was a seatbelt.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #11  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Crash testing?

Thirdgen seat belts suffered from a problem with the 84-up style latch. The red plastic push button release wasn't very UV resistant. They tend to break down, the plastic gets flaky, and eventually they stop working as well.

If you've ever spent any time in the junkyard, front and rear end collisions on thirdgens are pretty common, and the carnage usually isn't too bad. On the other hand, hard side impacts are really gnarly. I've looked at more then one thirdgen with the rocker panel pushed past where the center console used to be. When that happens, the door goes right through the occupant.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #12  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

its not just the release, the dual retractor system uses momentum sensors to lock the belt. its not very reliable and it doesnt tighten up well.
A common result of these defects was that on side impacts, the door opens and the occupants were ejected.
the 4th gen seat belts are a more conventional single retractor system and the release mechanism is more durable
fortunately, 4th gen seatbelts are easy to obtain
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 11:19 PM
  #13  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Crash testing?

Originally Posted by stealtht/a
A common result of these defects was that on side impacts, the door opens and the occupants were ejected.
That sounds like a complaint that would apply more to the door-mounted dual-retractor belts like the W cars had.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #14  
musclecar70sfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
From: Central Connecticut
Car: 91 Trans Am 'vert
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

Originally Posted by stealtht/a
its not just the release, the dual retractor system uses momentum sensors to lock the belt. its not very reliable and it doesnt tighten up well.
A common result of these defects was that on side impacts, the door opens and the occupants were ejected.
the 4th gen seat belts are a more conventional single retractor system and the release mechanism is more durable
fortunately, 4th gen seatbelts are easy to obtain
Originally Posted by Apeiron
That sounds like a complaint that would apply more to the door-mounted dual-retractor belts like the W cars had.
Yeah that sounds more like the door mounted belt cars. I don't see why it should work in a frontal crash and not a side crash. Maybe I'm missing something. And those momentum retractors are pretty funky... on my car (91 t/a) they lock up when I floor the gas pedal, corner hard, or slam on the brakes.... I can understand the last two but the first one just seems unnecessary lol. But what I love about em is that the damn seatbelts don't constantly lock up on you like on the newer cars. Drives me nuts how the belt locks up and you have to bring it back all the way and latch it again. My Grandpa's 02 Rendezvous does that all the time and sometimes it seems like the car wants to asphyxiate you. Sorry I'm rambling but I thought I'd mention haha.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #15  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: Crash testing?

no it was the f-bodies too.
the momentum things never had enough pre crash tension on it and the door openings are big so it was easy to slip out sideways once the doors pop open. also, we all know how underreinforced the unibodies are on these cars, the side impact litterally bent the cars in half because of the big door opening and t-tops made it worse. I remember seeing crash videos showing this problem. wish i hadnt, made me really paranoid at intersections when i drove my dads 1984 berlinetta in high school.
certainly not the least safe car ive driven though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
Oct 6, 2015 11:56 AM
Spyder_TheGamer
V6
5
Oct 2, 2015 12:25 PM
Eric-86sc
Interior Parts for Sale
1
Sep 28, 2015 11:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.