History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #1  
two85z28s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Hi Everybody. Check out this video on Youtube.
It is an old Motorweek '89 segment.
They compare a 1989 Production IROC-Z to an IROC race car.


Last edited by two85z28s; Jun 11, 2016 at 04:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #2  
mr396's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Car: 2003 BMW E46 M3 Vert
Engine: 3.2 I6 M power 333 h.p.
Transmission: SMG 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.62 posi
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Very Cool! Thanks for posting.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #3  
BigBadGTA's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

13.9 quarter mile for a stock 305 5 speed iroc? That cant be true..
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 04:42 PM
  #4  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 129
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by BigBadGTA
13.9 quarter mile for a stock 305 5 speed iroc? That cant be true..
It's not unheard of, but it is unusual.

Nice video.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 05:09 PM
  #5  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

LOL 13.9 for a stock LB9 is hard to believe. The best stock L98's rarely go faster then 14.0. Something is up with the time they posted. Either a glitch in the equipment, or some cheating by the crew. A typical time for that car is almost a full second slower.

Notice that they didn't run the cars on an actual drag strip...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
Flynt's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Auto overdrive
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Did Motorweek ever test a L98 car? Any links if they did? I have one and I would like to see performance figures for the 350 V8/automatic combination.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #7  
Scorpner's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 4
From: MN
Car: 85 SC, 86 Berlinetta
Engine: V6, V8
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by Flynt
Did Motorweek ever test a L98 car? Any links if they did? I have one and I would like to see performance figures for the 350 V8/automatic combination.
Try searching Youtube and find out. There was a '91 GTA with a 350 on the lower RH side of the link posted above.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 06:53 PM
  #8  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 129
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by Drew
LOL 13.9 for a stock LB9 is hard to believe. The best stock L98's rarely go faster then 14.0. Something is up with the time they posted. Either a glitch in the equipment, or some cheating by the crew. A typical time for that car is almost a full second slower.

Notice that they didn't run the cars on an actual drag strip...
Notice you said "typical" rather than "always"

Some cars are simply faster than others, for basically no reason at all. Couple a freak car with a very good driver and you get your really good time that is not typical. Also remember the car in question was not old and wore out like what we are used to.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #9  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,067
From: Salina, KS
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by 86blackiroc
Notice you said "typical" rather than "always"

Some cars are simply faster than others, for basically no reason at all. Couple a freak car with a very good driver and you get your really good time that is not typical. Also remember the car in question was not old and wore out like what we are used to.

Would you rather I state it differently? How about in 15 years on this forum I've never heard or seen any evidence or claim of a stock LB9 running that strong. It's common knowledge that LB9 5spd G92 cars are lucky to run better then mid 14's. New or old (tired) doesn't make that much difference either. Lots of magazines tested these cars new and didn't even get them into the mid-14's. People regularly run better times with 100k mile cars then the test times published back in the day. Believe what you want, but either they goofed when they calculated the ET, or someone cheated.

Check this out... http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
vehicle testing done by "the experts" at Car & Driver, Motor Trend, Road & Track, various written auto publications and from the auto manufacturers themselves.
The list is chopped up on a couple different pages...
1982 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 9.7 N/A
1983 Chevrolet Camaro 9.5 17.5
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 H.O. 6.7 15.0
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta 9.3 17.0
1985 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta 10.0 17.0
1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28 7.0 15.2
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z L98 6.8 15.3
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 7.0 15.5
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 5.8 14.4
1990 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.5 15.0
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 6.7 15.2

1983 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 9.2 17.0
1984 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am HO 7.9 16.1
1987 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am GTA (auto) 7.1 15.5
1988 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am GTA 7.4 15.9
1989 Pontiac 20th Anniv. Trans Am 5.1 14.2
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula 6.5 14.8
1991 Pontiac Trans Am Conv. 7.0 15.4

Notice that none of those times come close to breaking into the 13's. You can go ahead and search the forum, and read all the magazine articles from the late 80's and early 90's if you want, you still won't find anything to indicate there are really any factory freaks.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #10  
Camaro Z Man's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth TX
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Cool video.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #11  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 129
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by Drew
...Notice that none of those times come close to breaking into the 13's. You can go ahead and search the forum, and read all the magazine articles from the late 80's and early 90's if you want, you still won't find anything to indicate there are really any factory freaks.
I don't remember who it was, but there was a member here with a '92 Z28 that was low miles and bone stock that ran well into the 13's. I don't even remember if it was 5.7/auto or 5.0/5speed, but with a good driver there's not too much of a difference. I personally don't have the facts to back it up, but I don't care enough for that to bother me
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #12  
mooch1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: montreal-canada
Car: 1985 camaro Z/28
Engine: 305 V/8 4bbl carb
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3-23 posi with 4 wheel discs
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by two85z28s
Hi Everybody. Check out this video on Youtube.
It is an old Motorweek '89 segment.
They compare a 1989 Production IROC-Z to an IROC race car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4XjQGAnksE
it's funny, i remember my brother had a 1984 Z/28 5.0 h.o 5 speed...and his freind had a 1976 trans am with 6.6 and 4 speed,,,my brother beat him in the quarter mile every time...the camaro would take off faster with little wheel spin...and the t/a would fish tail on take off..
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #13  
NT-Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: So-Cal Upland
Car: Had 2 iroc-z's . An '87 & '88.
Engine: HAD 5.0 & 5.7 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

i would like 2 have those see-thru louvers @ 1:34
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 10:14 PM
  #14  
StevenB L98/LS1's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 710
Likes: 32
From: pensacola florida
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Here goes another debate. Whos gives a crap about the time! Just enjoy the video guys, we know the LB9s arent that fast.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 02:06 PM
  #15  
1Aauto's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 4
From: Westford, MA
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Thanks for posting that....very cool. Dale Earnhardt dominated that series. I miss not seeing the Iroc race in February during the speed week kick off to Daytona
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 05:49 PM
  #16  
DacMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

LOL "Suprisingly the Iroc beat the IROC Racing car off the line" Did you see how long that race car burned out... if that had hooked up it would have been no contest
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #17  
mooch1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: montreal-canada
Car: 1985 camaro Z/28
Engine: 305 V/8 4bbl carb
Transmission: T5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3-23 posi with 4 wheel discs
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by DacMan
LOL "Suprisingly the Iroc beat the IROC Racing car off the line" Did you see how long that race car burned out... if that had hooked up it would have been no contest
exactly, that's why my brother's 305 ho 5.0L beat the 76 trans am with 400 6,6L 4 speed...the trans am would spin and burn out and then take off while my brother had a small burn and took off quick...his freind with the trans am coudn't believe it!..i guess the torque arm prevents big burn outs and quick launches off the line like the video?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #18  
two85z28s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by DacMan
LOL "Suprisingly the Iroc beat the IROC Racing car off the line" Did you see how long that race car burned out... if that had hooked up it would have been no contest
Yeah, that is funny. If you look closely, the reason the production car had a lead, in the beginning, was because it took off about a 1/2 second before the race car. (That and the lack of traction that you mentioned.)

My favorite part is between 3:05 and 3:25. They say they're not really pushing the race car, but it looks like they're going pretty good!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #19  
Reid Fleming's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 15
From: Houston, TX
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: Pro Built S/S TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

140 mph top speed.....I believe this to be true. For a 305 at least. If they did a 350, they would have had to list 120 mph as the top speed, since these cars wouldn't do the WOT 3-4 shift from the factory.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #20  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 218
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Motorweek 89 IROC-Z vs. IROC Race Car

Originally Posted by mooch1
exactly, that's why my brother's 305 ho 5.0L beat the 76 trans am with 400 6,6L 4 speed...the trans am would spin and burn out and then take off while my brother had a small burn and took off quick...his freind with the trans am coudn't believe it!..i guess the torque arm prevents big burn outs and quick launches off the line like the video?
Just so you know, the two cars are similar in hp ratings. The 84 Camaro had 190hp while the TA had 185. The Camaro torque was considerably lower at 240 while the TA had 310. There's your tire spin right there, but even if the TA hooked up, it would still be a close race.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steven 86IROC-Z
DFI and ECM
8
Mar 28, 2026 06:42 PM
BlueIroc-Z
Camaros for Sale
7
Jun 9, 2019 03:22 AM
kyleb24
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 15, 2015 08:24 AM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
2
Aug 9, 2015 01:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.