History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

RPO Code 1SD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 03:44 PM
  #1  
Chase 89 RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
RPO Code 1SD

I found an RPO code that stands for option package 4. does anyone know what exactly came in this option or any more information on it? my car is an 89 RS
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2014 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,460
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: RPO Code 1SD

1SD is preferred equipment group 3. It cost $2,014 and was pretty much a fully loaded car.

Photo courtesy of camarosource.ca
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: RPO Code 1SD

Scott, I noticed PE group 3 includes "halogen low and high beam" , what was the base headlight?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #4  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,460
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: RPO Code 1SD

Non halogen. Halogen was new in the 80's and was a marketing detail for better lighting. Standard headlights were the norm. With everyone so used to the term Halogen these days, most people have probably replaced their standard lights with them and never knew there was a lesser lighting option.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 08:00 AM
  #5  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: RPO Code 1SD

Thanks! I remembered all my cars in the 80s had halogen sealed beams, guess I just assumed halogen had been around longer than that. Non halogen third gen lights must have really sucked!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2014 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
RockinGTA89's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 944
Likes: 13
From: Crest Hill, IL
Car: 1989 GTA Trans sold :(
Engine: 350 TPI L98 (B2L)
Transmission: TH700 R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: RPO Code 1SD

from my experience, the non halogens were indeed low emitted lighting systems. Halogens were a "reflected" upgrade as the beam projection from the inside element was more intense and had a reflector to bouce back the light from the rear of the shell of the housing and back thur the glass making the viewing area more bright on the roads at night.

However, there are better sources now, and not those annoying intense high energy discharge designs....(in some states they're illegal)....

I end up buying from halogen, the "true view" design which the light was much more softer illumination but the distance of view was greater. I recommend doing this to any of our thirdgens for better vision and futher clarity. It's still a bit pricy but worth the price. Thinking they cost around 21 or 22 bucks each...haven't bought them in awhile...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
Feb 22, 2022 09:26 PM
Falcon50
DFI and ECM
81
Aug 22, 2020 03:26 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
Oct 3, 2015 03:46 PM
Luigytico09
TPI
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:46 AM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.