Interior Discussion about interior restoration, repairs, and modifications.

To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
rottweiler68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: '89 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3.45
To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Just ordered new ACC carpet with mass backing and am unsure if that alone with the jute pad is sufficient or should I also add Dynamat when installing?

I am unsure if #1 it's overkill and #2 if the carpet will even sit right or be to bulky with all that.

Have never done carpet before so looking for some ideas on this.

Thank you!

Chuck
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:51 PM
  #2  
Neil350's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 303
Likes: 82
From: T E X A S
Car: 93 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 Street Twin
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.90
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

That padding is pretty thick, I am doing it on my GTA now. I skipped doing the floors with dynamat type material and plans to do the doors. It seems if you wanted to do the floors, order the carpet sans the mass backing and do your own sound deading on the floor. I have the same fear as you, with mass backing it seems the carpet would not lay right.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 08:52 PM
  #3  
TylerSteez's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 99
From: CT
Car: 86 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

I put dynomat in certain areas like above where the exhaust is before putting in my mass backing ACC carpet and I'm not too happy with how it came out, sounds kind of crinkly when I step into the car. I'm contemplating redoing certain areas of it. But don't let my experience discourage you from it, I've seen pics on here of other member's dynomat jobs and they did a great job with it.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:03 PM
  #4  
rottweiler68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: '89 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3.45
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by Neil350
That padding is pretty thick, I am doing it on my GTA now. I skipped doing the floors with dynamat type material and plans to do the doors. It seems if you wanted to do the floors, order the carpet sans the mass backing and do your own sound deading on the floor. I have the same fear as you, with mass backing it seems the carpet would not lay right.
My plan was not to Dynamat at all but wanted others opinions too, so thanks for your insight!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2017 | 09:03 PM
  #5  
rottweiler68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: '89 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3.45
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by TylerSteez
I put dynomat in certain areas like above where the exhaust is before putting in my mass backing ACC carpet and I'm not too happy with how it came out, sounds kind of crinkly when I step into the car. I'm contemplating redoing certain areas of it. But don't let my experience discourage you from it, I've seen pics on here of other member's dynomat jobs and they did a great job with it.
Thanks for the feedback!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 07:58 AM
  #6  
87v6Bird's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Car: 87 Firebird, 89 Trans Am
Engine: 406, LB9
Transmission: T56, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen, 2.73 Posi
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

On both my cars, I have a layer of the foil-backed rubber Dynamat topped by a layer of Dynapad (which is a multilayer foam) with the mass backing on my carpet. It's definitely a tighter fit to get all the interior panels and center console installed but it's doable. Bottom line, I noticed a great improvement in the interior noise levels of my cars.

In the 87, I originally started with just Dynamat. Interior noise levels were reduced but not as much as I'd really hoped. Later on, I got the 89 and pulled the carpet to repair the rusted floorboards. I went with both Dynamat and Dynapad when I put the carpet back in. The interior noise levels on the 89 were noticeably better than on the 87. When I decided to replace the carpet in the 87, I got replacement carpet from ACC with the mass backing and I also put in a layer of Dynapad. It's a tight fit but I got everything back in. Interior noise levels in the 87 are now as good as the 89. I'll have to look, I have pictures somewhere.

Also, another tip is to look into Dynamat and Dynapad alternatives. From what I've seen there are cheaper, equal alternatives. Just don't go for the asphalt roof sealer some people suggest.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 08:05 AM
  #7  
rottweiler68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: '89 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3.45
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by 87v6Bird
On both my cars, I have a layer of the foil-backed rubber Dynamat topped by a layer of Dynapad (which is a multilayer foam) with the mass backing on my carpet. It's definitely a tighter fit to get all the interior panels and center console installed but it's doable. Bottom line, I noticed a great improvement in the interior noise levels of my cars.

In the 87, I originally started with just Dynamat. Interior noise levels were reduced but not as much as I'd really hoped. Later on, I got the 89 and pulled the carpet to repair the rusted floorboards. I went with both Dynamat and Dynapad when I put the carpet back in. The interior noise levels on the 89 were noticeably better than on the 87. When I decided to replace the carpet in the 87, I got replacement carpet from ACC with the mass backing and I also put in a layer of Dynapad. It's a tight fit but I got everything back in. Interior noise levels in the 87 are now as good as the 89. I'll have to look, I have pictures somewhere.

Also, another tip is to look into Dynamat and Dynapad alternatives. From what I've seen there are cheaper, equal alternatives. Just don't go for the asphalt roof sealer some people suggest.
Great info, thank you! I've seen that roofing stuff on youtube from lowes/walmart and wondered lol.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 11:33 AM
  #8  
tomsaddy's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 54
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: TT LC9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

One of the things that the dynamat does that foam doesn't is dampen vibration in the sheetmetal. If you're using both, you don't have to use dynamat everywhere, just in the big flat sections.

A good way to tell is to tap on the surface your going to cover. If it sounds like your hitting a drum, then it would really benefit from the dynamat to stiffen the panel. Curved and integrally stiffened areas, like the trans tunnel, aren't as prone to vibration so the foam alone will be more effective there.

I used dynamat on mine, although not 100% of surfaces. I haven't decided yet which additional insulation to use.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 01:04 PM
  #9  
mantaguy's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 85
From: Mantua NJ
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

You really don't need it,the jute and the mass backing is pretty thick already.
Some people like it .some don't.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 09:35 PM
  #10  
jharrison5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 54
From: Lincoln, NE.
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 Vortec w/ factory TPI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 Posi
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

I guess it's all comes down to what you're looking to do with your car. I'm not worried about added weight, since my car will be a cruiser and not a racer.

I used some stuff called Fatmat I found on ebay and it really helped knock the "tin can" sound in my camaro. I actually liked it so well that I put some in my daily driven pickup and it made quite a difference when all the windows are up.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 10:16 PM
  #11  
rottweiler68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Car: '89 Iroc
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: Built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt - 3.45
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by jharrison5
I guess it's all comes down to what you're looking to do with your car. I'm not worried about added weight, since my car will be a cruiser and not a racer.

I used some stuff called Fatmat I found on ebay and it really helped knock the "tin can" sound in my camaro. I actually liked it so well that I put some in my daily driven pickup and it made quite a difference when all the windows are up.
Mine is just a cruiser as well. Is this Fatmat installed under the jute and carpet with mass backing? Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 11:04 PM
  #12  
mantaguy's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 85
From: Mantua NJ
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Yes , it is installed under the carpet,If your car is just for cruising and it's so noisy use it ,If not, Don't waist your money.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
scooter's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by tomsaddy
One of the things that the dynamat does that foam doesn't is dampen vibration in the sheetmetal. If you're using both, you don't have to use dynamat everywhere, just in the big flat sections.

A good way to tell is to tap on the surface your going to cover. If it sounds like your hitting a drum, then it would really benefit from the dynamat to stiffen the panel. Curved and integrally stiffened areas, like the trans tunnel, aren't as prone to vibration so the foam alone will be more effective there.
This is 100% accurate. You only need 25% coverage on flat panels with Dynamat and the like.

In my car I used Fatmat ~25-50% coverage on all the flat places on the floor, then I put a layer of Mass Loaded Vinyl in addition to the mass backed carpet. I think it made a huge difference in the interior sound reduction. I haven't done the doors or the B pillars yet though, I am hoping to get close to what the sound level reduction would be out of a new car. I also did the roof with Fatmat, again 50% and I put butyl rope in the cracks if the reinforcing bits to the flat panels, that made a big difference in the vibration reduction up there compared to just the fatmat on the flat surfaces.


**EDIT, should be 25%, not 50, sorry***

Last edited by scooter; Oct 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 02:12 PM
  #14  
jharrison5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 54
From: Lincoln, NE.
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 Vortec w/ factory TPI
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 Posi
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by rottweiler68
Mine is just a cruiser as well. Is this Fatmat installed under the jute and carpet with mass backing? Thanks!
Yup it came in a big roll and I just cut it to fit. I covered the entire floor because i didn't know any better, but when I did the pickup I used it sparingly on the flat areas.

Here's the link to my build with the pics of the mat installed.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/memb...ml#post6024079
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2017 | 07:31 PM
  #15  
87v6Bird's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Car: 87 Firebird, 89 Trans Am
Engine: 406, LB9
Transmission: T56, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Torsen, 2.73 Posi
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

A few pictures of the deadening materials I've put in my cars. As others have noted, you don't need so much coverage with the Dynamat. I didn't know better at the time. Hope they show for everyone.










Reply
Old Nov 18, 2017 | 04:21 AM
  #16  
ktthecarguy's Avatar
On Probation
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 411
Likes: 16
From: Livonia MI
Car: 88 Camaro vert/86 SC
Engine: 355 tbi/2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4/T5
Axle/Gears: 2.72 posi/3.42 open
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Hi there,
There is also a product called Thermo-Tec available at Walmart, part #14620, in a 36" X 60" sheet. I bought 2 sheets and did the whole car, including a couple panels in the roof above the headliner. It's very effective, and way cheaper than dynamat.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2018 | 10:02 PM
  #17  
rushtk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 1
From: Athens Ohio
Car: Teal 92 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Do not buy the the crap from lowes or home depot if you live in hot climates!!! The stuff after time becomes brittle and you lose the efficiency of it and then need to clean up the mess. We restored our 99 tahoe 4 dr last summer and at 60 mph the inside db level was 101, spent 2k on a thermal floor sealer and Dynamat products (headliner came out also) and it went to 73 db at 60 mph. After weather stripping is done it will be less. The inside cab temp was also regulated better! We are restoring my sons soon to be first car (92 Z hard top) now and it is completely stripped out and we will do the same but with a company called Second Skin.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2018 | 11:50 PM
  #18  
T.L.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 826
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Did the factory carpet have the mass backing, or is that an upgrade for replacement carpet?...
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2018 | 11:01 AM
  #19  
mantaguy's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 85
From: Mantua NJ
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Originally Posted by T.L.
Did the factory carpet have the mass backing, or is that an upgrade for replacement carpet?...
Yes ,it came with Mass Backing from the factory and it is a upgrade on replacement.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2018 | 08:16 AM
  #20  
ScarabChris's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

I used this product instead of Dynamat. It's a fraction of the cost. They make it in wider rolls too. It's a little thinner than Dynamat but not by much. I noticed a little difference in road noise after lining the floor of the car with this. Pick up a few rolls at your local Home Depot.

Reply
Old Feb 6, 2018 | 04:59 PM
  #21  
Sweatlock's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 126
Likes: 12
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

It's very subjective: what's acceptable to one person may not be to another. I drive a '92 Firebird convertible and I have no additional sound deadening under the carpet - I have only the jute backing without the 'mass backing' and I actually think the car is very quiet and vibration-free at 70 MPH, surprisingly so.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 12:42 PM
  #22  
grover85's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
From: New Germany, MN
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 9 Inch w/ 3.55
Re: To Dynamat or not to Dynamat.....

Wish I could go back in time and not put it in. Scraping it out and it sucks
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.