Interior Discussion about interior restoration, repairs, and modifications.

Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 08:32 AM
  #1  
ThePain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 13
From: Alaska
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic
Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

So, I've never had problems sitting in a car like i do in my 92 Camaro. I can manage, but darn if i can't figure out how to operate the dang headrest.

It seems imposible to position my seat in a position to where I can actually rest my head back without looking at the sky.

The only option seems to be to have the seat tilted straight up which presents other complications to my body.

Am I crazy here or are our seats just ridiculous?

Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
scooter's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by ThePain
I can manage, but darn if i can't figure out how to operate the dang headrest.
Operate? It only goes up and down. Plus it's not really a head rest, its more to prevent you from getting whiplash in the event of being hit from the rear.

And yes, Camaro seats suck. Get some GTA seats if you want a head rest
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
gt4373's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 348
From: CT
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0 Liter 4-BBL V8 High Output
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by scooter
a head rest, its more to prevent you from getting whiplash in the event of being hit from the rear.

They Weren't Made For Your Head To Be In Constant Contact.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Seats are fine. That air cleaner, on the other hand, is a problem waiting to happen.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
Sweatlock's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 126
Likes: 12
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Yes.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
Eagle223usa's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
From: Pgh PA
Car: 89 5.7 IROC/95 LT1 Corvette
Engine: All 5.7's
Transmission: 700R4 (Roessler)/ZF6
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Zexel 3.23's. CTW 17" wheel
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Yeah, our seats in the Camaro are not the most comfortable...
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 09:25 PM
  #7  
mantaguy's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 84
From: Mantua NJ
Car: 1 Owner 1986 TA with a WS6 package
Engine: 5.0 EFI
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 277 Posi Speedo
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

1 option would be to convert it over to a 6 way power seat.I'm sure you will find a comfortable position with it.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2018 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
Jbuchanan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 528
Likes: 46
From: Sweet home Alabama
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by Drew
Seats are fine. That air cleaner, on the other hand, is a problem waiting to happen.
that thing is responsible for burning some nice rides to the ground.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2018 | 08:15 AM
  #9  
scottmoyer's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,459
Likes: 215
From: Florida
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

If you're trying to compare newer cars with the cars from the 80s, you'll find many issues like this. As was mentioned, the head rest isn't a head rest like you find in newer cars. It was there only to prevent whiplash. The brakes were nothing like the newer car's brakes and the electronics were very simplified, compared to today's cars. You need to accept the car for what it originally was. Otherwise, you'll find yourself in a new car.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2018 | 10:24 AM
  #10  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

^^^^Truth^^^^

Compare thirdgen seats to other 80's seats. Ever slid off the vinyl seats in a second gen? Or ridden the bench seats in countless family trucksters? Driving an hour or two on the standard buckets in my 86 Mustang, is a fate worse than death.

Thirdgen seats ain't bad.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2018 | 01:13 PM
  #11  
navy02ws6's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 68
From: Atlanta
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by Jbuchanan
that thing is responsible for burning some nice rides to the ground.


I just always thought they were hands down the ugliest air cleaner on the market -- good to know they're a liability too!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2018 | 05:47 PM
  #12  
luvofjah's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 20
From: PNW
Car: 91 Black Formula KR
Engine: 305 TPI R69/G92
Transmission: Astro A5-Pro 5.0-McCleod
Axle/Gears: US Gear 3.42 Eaton True Trac
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

As noted, if you actually want to use the "headrest", you may have to get another seat.

Options for adjusting the seats, later years had manual seats that not only went forward and backwards, but tilted back, which makes a nice difference in comfort (not headrest thought) I picked up one of these manual tracks and it's nice...

If you're really tall, Knight Designs sell some brackets that will move the seat back further too... there may be a post on here about that...

Rafael
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2018 | 05:55 PM
  #13  
MY87LT's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 17
From: Southern California
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by mantaguy
1 option would be to convert it over to a 6 way power seat.I'm sure you will find a comfortable position with it.
I did this to my car and it was a big improvement. Not that difficult to do either. As for comfort, I never had an issue until I began to drive newer cars and expected to have that same type of comfort.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2018 | 06:06 PM
  #14  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: Do our seats just suck? (92 RS)

Originally Posted by luvofjah
Options for adjusting the seats, later years had manual seats that not only went forward and backwards, but tilted back, which makes a nice difference in comfort.
The four way manual seat track was nearly exclusively a Firebird feature from what I've seen. It's usually only used with cars that have one of the higher tier option packages, but it's also standard on the Trans Ams in some years.

Maybe it's just me, but I almost always set the 4way to the exact position of the standard manual tracks. LOL After a dozen thirdgens and two and half decades anything else just feels wrong.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ThePain
Car Audio
10
Apr 18, 2010 07:43 PM
Kevman
Convertibles
7
Nov 26, 2009 04:24 PM
lonsal
Southern California Area
2
Dec 14, 2002 03:39 PM
Xenodrgn
North East Region
5
Sep 19, 2002 09:43 PM
fattie92
Tech / General Engine
18
Feb 1, 2002 11:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.