LSx pan to k member clearance
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, In
Car: 1994 z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
LSx pan to k member clearance
Hello, long time since I have been active on here. Just bought an 88 Camaro for an LSx engine swap. I have an LQ9 with a set of ported LS2 heads to go into it. My question is this: What kind of pan clearance can I expect by running Spohn motor mount pads on the stock k member? I am going to run the GM performance LSx swap pan which I believe to be not as big of a sump area. Was looking at going tubular, but if I am only going to gain a few pounds in weight savings, I will use the money elsewhere on the build. Pics would be very helpful.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: LSx pan to k member clearance
Welcome back. We have a LTX and LSX engine swap subforum now (to which I have moved this).
I'm not sure any TGO member has tried that pan yet, but the consensus is it still hangs down too low below anything else under the car, and would be easy to damage. The f-body pan is generally considered to be the best choice.
Just bought an 88 Camaro for an LSx engine swap. I have an LQ9 with a set of ported LS2 heads to go into it. My question is this: What kind of pan clearance can I expect by running Spohn motor mount pads on the stock k member? I am going to run the GM performance LSx swap pan which I believe to be not as big of a sump area. Was looking at going tubular, but if I am only going to gain a few pounds in weight savings, I will use the money elsewhere on the build. Pics would be very helpful.
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Re: LSx pan to k member clearance
Hello, long time since I have been active on here. Just bought an 88 Camaro for an LSx engine swap. I have an LQ9 with a set of ported LS2 heads to go into it. My question is this: What kind of pan clearance can I expect by running Spohn motor mount pads on the stock k member? I am going to run the GM performance LSx swap pan which I believe to be not as big of a sump area. Was looking at going tubular, but if I am only going to gain a few pounds in weight savings, I will use the money elsewhere on the build. Pics would be very helpful.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,079
Likes: 4
From: Pepperell, MA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LQ9/L92
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: LSx pan to k member clearance
I too would agree fbody pan really is your best bet clearance wise. Mine is just about level with the bottom of the k-member, I wouldn't want to go any lower, especially if you have bumpy roads or plan on lowering the car
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, In
Car: 1994 z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
Re: LSx pan to k member clearance
Thanks for the replies! I dont plan on lowering it much if any, but it looks like I may just look for an F body pan.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Buggy Disaster
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Sep 22, 2015 01:15 PM
Ragtop Man
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 12, 2015 12:23 AM






