Organized Drag Racing and Autocross Drag racing and autocross discussions and questions. Techniques, tips, suggestions, and "what will I run?" questions.

Best setup for (VERY) low-traction conditions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2006, 09:35 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Best setup for (VERY) low-traction conditions?

Yeah, I know that the Subj./Title line probably sounds kind of odd, but I have a good reason for asking. The big thing that I'm building my car for is to get into the 130 - or maybe even the 150! - Club on the Bonneville salt flats.

The challenge with that is that you begin from a standing start, like a drag race, & you have to be able to get up to the speed specified (130 or 150) within one mile. No problem, right?

The difficulty lies in the fact that there's very little traction to be had - here are a couple of quotes I've gotten when I started investigating this from people who've been there for years...

-You only get 5 runs to figure out how to get the 130MPH and most of those 5 runs is spent trying to figure out how to get the tires hooked the best way you can so the car can get up to speed.
-It's a slippery b-tch and people don't realize that you can still be spinning the tires at 130mph.
-I have a friend from Idaho who took his ****** drag car to Bonneville in the 1990's to run that that 130 club.
-His comments about the traction were that it was nothing different that trying to run WFO on the freeway right after a 4" snowstorm with snow tires.
--------------------------------------------------
-An example of the traction problem is---back in the about 1989 Karl Staggemier for NOS and Gary Eaker from GM windtunnel brought a new transam out there with one of Joe Ruttmans carbureted Winston cup engines.
-300mph was the elusive mark that several production bodied cars were flirting with at the time like Mike Cook had gone 298 with a T-bird and blown hemi.
-seems like the HP numbers needed to do 300 mph are something like about 1200 to 1600.
-----------------------------------------
-Karl had like 5 huge nitrous bottles in the trunk of that trans am with some of that nitrous to the engine and some was being wasted thru air to air intercoolers where they supposedly were getting the air temp to way below zero F.
-This was a big deal so we were witnessing the event at the 5mile mark which is the end of the long course----Gary was driving-----and buzzing the tires off and on all the entire way searching for traction----and still only went 298mph.
Now, I'm currently trying to learn which tires will work the best for me, as well as any aero tricks that might help - but I figure that you guys can probably give me some really good advice regarding what I can do to get the best possible "hook" all the way down the mile...

(Or, alternatively, what tricks have worked for you when the track was really bad?? Besides VHT! )

Thanks in advance!!
Old 04-29-2006, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
I have never run it but I heard and from watching some of the cars that it maybe a good idea to run smaller tires
Old 04-29-2006, 10:10 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Yeah, I've already figured out that I'm probably going to have to have special tires shipped to me (not that big a deal, I guess).

I guess what I'm really hoping to learn is what kinds of "chassis setup tricks" work well for slick tracks when drag racing? New LCAs, changing pinion angle or the angle of the torque arm, or...? (Yes, I'm pretty new to this ) What kinds of things can help you to really hook well?

It's really a "different" form of racing in that a lot of people add weight in an attempt to find traction!

It's also interesting to see how racing is changed when you take away the traction part of the equation...

Thanks for the reply!

Last edited by V8Rumble; 04-30-2006 at 11:10 AM.
Old 04-30-2006, 10:12 AM
  #4  
Member
 
84406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Blaine WA
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355/460hp
Transmission: glide\ford 9"
A often used size for the 130 would be a 185-195/??/15. You could also use front runners of about 6" wide tread. Other classes are using the front runners to well over 200.
Old 05-01-2006, 02:10 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
1983Fbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Newberry, Mi
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: transam, el camino
Engine: 415
Transmission: T56
I posted a reply in your other thread about possibly using nascar tires, now that I've seen this thread and what you plan to do... A big wing might be helpful by putting more downforce onto the back end, it will slow you down a bit as well from aerodynamics the traction payoff may be better than the aero drag tho! Look at funny cars, they have huge wings and still manage to crack 300 can't get the power down might as well have ten thousand horsepower its useless w/o traction and at 130 a lot of drag isn't that harmful. It's at a point of about 150mph that aero drag really starts to come into play, a boxy car like a chevelle needs something close to 8or9 hundred horsepower to reach 200 versus a similarly geared thirdgen only needs about 500 horses. That's with all the basic aero mods, slight body rake, low front spoiler, mirrors removed, ductape covering the body seams, etc. Just about any vehicle with enough power can reach up to 150 without any of those aero mods on good traction surface, worrying about Coefficient drag (sp?) should only come into play after the magic 150 number. you either need more power or less drag to go faster after 150 so I really think a wing may help you more than hurt.
-Ben
Old 05-06-2006, 09:31 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 39.84N 105.11W
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Thanks for the reply. I'm checking the rules to see whether or not an add-on wing is allowed in the classes I'll be running. I've already got the GTA aerowing which is supposed to be pretty good, but I agree with you - one of the biggest factors in whether or not I'm successful will be traction, & more downforce is likely to be a big help.

Been studying a LOT on aerodynamics lately, from all of the research I've been doing (reading and empirical data from those who've been there), it seems that aerodynamics first start to come into play at around 35 mph, but the real "wall" that people run into is right around the 170-175 mph mark. (Interestingly, this seems to be regardless of the platform that people are using - my buddy/coworker is building his WRX for the salt also, so I'm getting some data from his side as well).

It's also interesting how people come out of the woodwork when they find out that you're getting ready to run B'ville - the guy who runs the body shop that's fixing my wife's car (long story) pulled out a half-dozen pictures of the time he went as a crewmember to help wrench on a stretched-wheelbase Infiniti that had an Infiniti Indy-car engine in it! Sucker did 230 without even working too hard... He said that they captured the record for their street-car class, then bolted on an airdam & a fairly decent-sized aluminum wing using Dzus fasteners, then went out & got the record for the 'modified' class the same day. (He also had a pic of a motorcycle that had a 426 Hemi - complete with Roots blower and Hilborn scoop - that had made the trip there! )

Anyway, thanks again for the reply. If anyone else can think of anything that might help me plant the power to the ground, I'd sure like to hear it...
Old 05-07-2006, 10:18 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
If it were me, I would look into an ignition box with a mutliple retard feature or multiple customizable timing curves. Build a stout motor, pull a bunch of timing in your lower gears and slowly start adding it back in as you pick up speed (and hopefully downforce).
Old 05-21-2006, 03:09 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
one mag was trying to do a top speed run. think what they ended up using was y or z rated snow tires.
said it helped out a lot. still wasn't that great but better then what it was.
might want to give it a shot
Old 05-21-2006, 09:33 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Anvil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I read an article on that Trans Am at Bonneville in 1989.As I remember, they had a problem with the door glass popping out at the top(not sure what speed this happened at).The fix was a small clip at the top.Just an observation, but Formula 1 cars pay a lot of attention to the amount and route of air under the car.
Ross
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
11-19-2015 07:03 AM
my86bird
Firebirds for Sale
9
10-23-2015 12:20 PM
Jetmeck
Interior
3
09-04-2015 12:29 AM
FLAP
Camaros Wanted
0
09-02-2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: Best setup for (VERY) low-traction conditions?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.